Medical Vessels
- Tinadrin Chelnor
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 3:11 am
- Location: Pendroca IV
Medical Vessels
Regarding medical ships like the Olympic and any others the Federation may employ.
If I recall correctly, the Pasteur never fired any weapons in the episode "All Good Things...". It seems to me that medical vessels shouldn't be armed, as there intended role is as a hospital in space. The idea of an armed medical ship just doesn't sit right with me, as their lack of armaments would minimize any potential for them to be used offensively, and allow them to remain neutral when rendering aid to a colony or world. For example, say that a Romulan colony or a world in the Neutral Zone, or the DMZ had an outbreak of plague. If the Federation started sending armed ships to "help" the world, I could understand the Romulans or Cardassians being uneasy at the prospect, but if they sent in unarmed vessels then the risk of them being used offensively is pretty much nil. Yes they may be at risk, but then even if they were armed it wouldn't be enough to fend off any real warship threat.
Thus, would it be more logical to employ unarmed hospital / medical response vessels.
If I recall correctly, the Pasteur never fired any weapons in the episode "All Good Things...". It seems to me that medical vessels shouldn't be armed, as there intended role is as a hospital in space. The idea of an armed medical ship just doesn't sit right with me, as their lack of armaments would minimize any potential for them to be used offensively, and allow them to remain neutral when rendering aid to a colony or world. For example, say that a Romulan colony or a world in the Neutral Zone, or the DMZ had an outbreak of plague. If the Federation started sending armed ships to "help" the world, I could understand the Romulans or Cardassians being uneasy at the prospect, but if they sent in unarmed vessels then the risk of them being used offensively is pretty much nil. Yes they may be at risk, but then even if they were armed it wouldn't be enough to fend off any real warship threat.
Thus, would it be more logical to employ unarmed hospital / medical response vessels.
"No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against that power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand."
Re: Medical Vessels
I disagree. Due to pirates and raiders and such they should have some level of offensive weapons. Put one decent sniper rifle on a tanker and the Somali pirate issues would drop drastically. Same would go for a case like this. I am sure that an "Olympic" ship full of medical supplies and equipment would go for some serious latinum on the black market.
Ugh... do not thump the Book of G'Quan...
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Medical Vessels
If you need to send a hospital ship into a high-threat area that's what escorts are for, not arming it, partially for the reasons Tinadrin gives, partially because as soon as you put weapons on anything it becomes a military target.Jim wrote:I disagree. Due to pirates and raiders and such they should have some level of offensive weapons.
That's an entirely different can of worms. Light weapons have been effective in repelling attempted boardings, but there are a lot of legal and practical issues to navigate, and there's always the risk of it sparking an arms race or a change of tactics from the pirates.Put one decent sniper rifle on a tanker and the Somali pirate issues would drop drastically.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Medical Vessels
I agree with the sentiment of not arming medical ships... but only so far.
Also, we have seen may times in 'Trek the use of armaments for patently non-offensive uses. Perhaps there is a low-power version which would be proof against asteroids, over-pressure in planetary crusts, etc., but would be so minimally effective against other vessels as to be tantamount to being unarmed?
This works if and only if the other powers in question agree. That is, if there is some sort of understanding that unarmed aid vessels are off-limits, then great. If one of the powers has shown an intention to attack vessels fo the other powers be they hospitals or battleships, then the deal is off.Tinadrin Chelnor wrote:For example, say that a Romulan colony or a world in the Neutral Zone, or the DMZ had an outbreak of plague. If the Federation started sending armed ships to "help" the world, I could understand the Romulans or Cardassians being uneasy at the prospect, but if they sent in unarmed vessels then the risk of them being used offensively is pretty much nil.
Also, we have seen may times in 'Trek the use of armaments for patently non-offensive uses. Perhaps there is a low-power version which would be proof against asteroids, over-pressure in planetary crusts, etc., but would be so minimally effective against other vessels as to be tantamount to being unarmed?
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Tinadrin Chelnor
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 3:11 am
- Location: Pendroca IV
Re: Medical Vessels
Similar to the low power disruptor on Dukat's freighter? Or if I recall (didn't really watch Enterprise often) the plasma cannon on Mayweather's family's freighter. Both seemed to have very low powered armaments, which don't appear to be too dangerous to starships, but I would guess could be used for other, non offensive uses.Mikey wrote:I agree with the sentiment of not arming medical ships... but only so far.
This works if and only if the other powers in question agree. That is, if there is some sort of understanding that unarmed aid vessels are off-limits, then great. If one of the powers has shown an intention to attack vessels fo the other powers be they hospitals or battleships, then the deal is off.Tinadrin Chelnor wrote:For example, say that a Romulan colony or a world in the Neutral Zone, or the DMZ had an outbreak of plague. If the Federation started sending armed ships to "help" the world, I could understand the Romulans or Cardassians being uneasy at the prospect, but if they sent in unarmed vessels then the risk of them being used offensively is pretty much nil.
Also, we have seen may times in 'Trek the use of armaments for patently non-offensive uses. Perhaps there is a low-power version which would be proof against asteroids, over-pressure in planetary crusts, etc., but would be so minimally effective against other vessels as to be tantamount to being unarmed?
"No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against that power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand."
Re: Medical Vessels
The Pasteur could easily have been a ship repurposed to be a medical ship. The Olympic class could have been another type of science ship. Maybe a long distance one.
There is a case for both. Escorts work and if other powers agree, a unarmed medical ship works too.
I like the idea of a medical vessel. Fits perfectly with the incidents we have seen pop-up in Star Trek.
There is a case for both. Escorts work and if other powers agree, a unarmed medical ship works too.
I like the idea of a medical vessel. Fits perfectly with the incidents we have seen pop-up in Star Trek.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Medical Vessels
IIRC, he mounted a hugely powerful surface-to-air phaser cannon on the freighter in order to function as a sort of Cardie Q-ship.Tinadrin Chelnor wrote:Similar to the low power disruptor on Dukat's freighter?
No, those were really supposed to be a deterrent to piracy... they just weren't effective because of obsolescence. What I mean is something that is SOA but obviously not suitable as a function of its specs for s2s combat.Tinadrin Chelnor wrote: Or if I recall (didn't really watch Enterprise often) the plasma cannon on Mayweather's family's freighter.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Re: Medical Vessels
If I remember Dukat's original disrupted was a wide beam something that had an issue with asteroids.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 21747
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
- Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
- Contact:
Re: Medical Vessels
Dukat's freighter did have a beam weapon before the 'upgrade'. It just sucked.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
- Tinadrin Chelnor
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 3:11 am
- Location: Pendroca IV
Re: Medical Vessels
Mikey wrote:IIRC, he mounted a hugely powerful surface-to-air phaser cannon on the freighter in order to function as a sort of Cardie Q-ship.Tinadrin Chelnor wrote:Similar to the low power disruptor on Dukat's freighter?
Which is when they came upon the idea of mounting a large surface-orbit disruptor cannon in the cargo bay.Tsukiyumi wrote:Dukat's freighter did have a beam weapon before the 'upgrade'. It just sucked.
"No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against that power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand."
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Medical Vessels
I see. No, not the same thing, then. The freighter's original weapons probably just sucked because of obsolescence and being at the back of the line for upfits. What I'm talking about is something intentionally non-threatening so as to just about count as "unarmed."
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Re: Medical Vessels
If it's unarmed, it's got to stay within the Federation borders and use established travel routes (to avoid asteroids and all that). If the Pasteur is out of Federation space looking for people to save, the only thing protecting them from raiders/pirates is the Starfleet colors (Red, white and blue?). Pirates might not want to suffer the wrath of Starfleet.
I like the idea of an unarmed hospital ship being able to traverse open space unmolested even in times of war. The thing is for something to be that free, it might have to be a vessel independent of the Federation. That will just open them up to raiding, piracy, and kidnapping.
I like the idea of an unarmed hospital ship being able to traverse open space unmolested even in times of war. The thing is for something to be that free, it might have to be a vessel independent of the Federation. That will just open them up to raiding, piracy, and kidnapping.
"Bible, Wrath of Khan, what's the difference?"
Stan - South Park
Stan - South Park
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: Medical Vessels
In the universe in which it is set there appears little guarantee that pirates, small militia, renegades like Lursa and B'Etor etc would leave the ship alone. Against a real combat ship a couple of phaser arrays is not going to be even remotely a problem but they are an effective deterrent against raiders. Plus as Mikey has already said shipboard phasers appear genuinely useful for all sorts of things. Cutting into rock surfaces, breaking up asteroids etc, just the sort of thing a ship with mission parameters designed entirely around benevolence would be doing
- Tholian_Avenger
- Lieutenant jg
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 5:51 am
- Location: Here, just past there.
Re: Medical Vessels
As you said, a dedicated warship is much more lethal, but consider that something with the size, power, and technology of starship is a weapon in its own right. I'd think a Federation starship could really damage a planet with several of its "nonweapon" systems up to outright self destruct or ramming at a very high velocity with respect to the planet.Tinadrin Chelnor wrote:sending armed ships to "help" the world, I could understand the Romulans or Cardassians being uneasy at the prospect, but if they sent in unarmed vessels then the risk of them being used offensively is pretty much nil. Yes they may be at risk, but then even if they were armed it wouldn't be enough to fend off any real warship threat.
6 Star Admiral of the Loyal Water Buffaloes and Honorable Turtles
Re: Medical Vessels
I could see having unarmed medical ships. And that does seem to match what we see yes? Mostly I could see their use in particularly sensitive regions. The Cardassian Demilitarized zone comes to mind. Where both sides would be various suspicious of any armed vessel for any reason, even if only because of those "ooops, looks like the captain went rogue and started blowing stuff up" incidents.
In various times you also have the Klingon and Romulan neutral zones. Presumably the Federation might have arrangements like that with other powers. There might also be various contraining laws and whatnot even with Federation allies that would preculde weapons, rather like the situations that leave our cargo ships vulnerable to somalian pirates.
Totally unarmed ships might also be able to assist aliens that would be distrustful of anything else (be that might be able to provide their own escorts to keep pirates at bay).
As for asteroids and whatnot, that's what the navigational deflector is for. If an asteroid is too big for that you should detect the thing far enough away to either alter course or use a tractor beam.
In various times you also have the Klingon and Romulan neutral zones. Presumably the Federation might have arrangements like that with other powers. There might also be various contraining laws and whatnot even with Federation allies that would preculde weapons, rather like the situations that leave our cargo ships vulnerable to somalian pirates.
Totally unarmed ships might also be able to assist aliens that would be distrustful of anything else (be that might be able to provide their own escorts to keep pirates at bay).
As for asteroids and whatnot, that's what the navigational deflector is for. If an asteroid is too big for that you should detect the thing far enough away to either alter course or use a tractor beam.