Divergence in the divergence of divergence.Captain Seafort wrote: They knew for a fact that the attack on the Kelvin was a break. The issue for us is that the pre-attack Kelvin clearly wasn't part of the Geneverse, introducing a further point or points of divergence.
Enterprise-which timeline?
Re: Enterprise-which timeline?
Trata las situaciones estresantes como lo haría 1 perro: si no puedes comértelo o jugar con ello, méate encima y lárgate!!!
Handle stressful situations as a dog would: if you can't eat it or play with it, pee on it and get out of there!!!
Handle stressful situations as a dog would: if you can't eat it or play with it, pee on it and get out of there!!!
Re: Enterprise-which timeline?
I would say the destruction of Romulus must have happened in all universes or most of them. If caused by a natural phenomenon there are no reason for it not to happend in every universe except those universes where Spock or somebody else has avoided it.Lt. Staplic wrote:I see three Seperate Timelines arriving:
2. Gap Verse - The Universe Created by the events of First Contact that lead to a more advanced Earth and Federation. Leads to Enterprise and the nKelvin, possible that it is only in this Universe that Romulus is destroyed.
About the 3 (at least) separete timelines i have to agree.
Trata las situaciones estresantes como lo haría 1 perro: si no puedes comértelo o jugar con ello, méate encima y lárgate!!!
Handle stressful situations as a dog would: if you can't eat it or play with it, pee on it and get out of there!!!
Handle stressful situations as a dog would: if you can't eat it or play with it, pee on it and get out of there!!!
Re: Enterprise-which timeline?
I personally believe there is no divergence between ENT 22nd century and TOS 23rd century and beyond. Yes, ENT presents contradictions from the earlier Trek shows on a few points for example the Klingons. But the series was never intended to be a new Trek universe. I think it's a just a popular fan theory to explain the differences between ENT and other series.
I mean really, somehow the ENT timeline is more advanced than originally because of Cochrane saw the shape of E-E?
I mean really, somehow the ENT timeline is more advanced than originally because of Cochrane saw the shape of E-E?
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
-
- 2 Star Admiral
- Posts: 8094
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:25 am
- Commendations: Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: Somewhere Among the Stars
- Contact:
Re: Enterprise-which timeline?
That's true none of this is in any way in agreement with canon, but I like to believe it anyway since it makes a whole hell of a lot more sense.
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 6:52 pm
- Location: I'm in your mind!
Re: Enterprise-which timeline?
I can solve this problem. ST XI never happened.
Re: Enterprise-which timeline?
Another possibility is that when The Sisko met Kirk in Trials and Tribble-ations, The Sisko challenged Kirk to a fight. It happened off screen because the sheer awesomeness couldn't be contained by mere cameras. The fight caused a ripple through space-time thus creating ENT, specifically when Kirk judo chop was blocked by a back handed pimp slap from The Sisko.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Enterprise-which timeline?
Could you imagine if they both connected with a two-handed hammer punch of awesomeness at the same time? Such an occurrence is probably the source of creation for new universes.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 13086
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact:
Re: Enterprise-which timeline?
Mikey... you might well have doomed us all!Mikey wrote:Could you imagine if they both connected with a two-handed hammer punch of awesomeness at the same time? Such an occurrence is probably the source of creation for new universes.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Enterprise-which timeline?
If that is what kills me, I'll be ready to go.RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:Mikey... you might well have doomed us all!Mikey wrote:Could you imagine if they both connected with a two-handed hammer punch of awesomeness at the same time? Such an occurrence is probably the source of creation for new universes.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Enterprise-which timeline?
Kirk and Sisko fighting... pretty sure even the Borg would haul ass out of the galaxy to avoid the backlash.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 6:52 pm
- Location: I'm in your mind!
Re: Enterprise-which timeline?
It could be a split off the mirror universe, where they got the Vulcan technology but eventually formed the federation and became a more advanced version of the one we know and love. That avoids more splits while provides another explanation.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Enterprise-which timeline?
Avoids? Assuming the involvement of the MU opens a whole new unsupported can of worms.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 6:52 pm
- Location: I'm in your mind!
Re: Enterprise-which timeline?
I'm sorry, would you prefer I opened up this can of Whoop-Ass?
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Enterprise-which timeline?
Alex vs Mikey... that would be extremely funny.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Enterprise-which timeline?
I add a whole can of whoop-ass to my coffee in the morning.alexmann wrote:I'm sorry, would you prefer I opened up this can of Whoop-Ass?
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer