Enterprise-which timeline?

Enterprise
SomosFuga
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 647
Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 9:37 pm
Location: Perú

Re: Enterprise-which timeline?

Post by SomosFuga »

Captain Seafort wrote: They knew for a fact that the attack on the Kelvin was a break. The issue for us is that the pre-attack Kelvin clearly wasn't part of the Geneverse, introducing a further point or points of divergence.
Divergence in the divergence of divergence.
Trata las situaciones estresantes como lo haría 1 perro: si no puedes comértelo o jugar con ello, méate encima y lárgate!!!

Handle stressful situations as a dog would: if you can't eat it or play with it, pee on it and get out of there!!!
SomosFuga
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 647
Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 9:37 pm
Location: Perú

Re: Enterprise-which timeline?

Post by SomosFuga »

Lt. Staplic wrote:I see three Seperate Timelines arriving:
2. Gap Verse - The Universe Created by the events of First Contact that lead to a more advanced Earth and Federation. Leads to Enterprise and the nKelvin, possible that it is only in this Universe that Romulus is destroyed.
I would say the destruction of Romulus must have happened in all universes or most of them. If caused by a natural phenomenon there are no reason for it not to happend in every universe except those universes where Spock or somebody else has avoided it.


About the 3 (at least) separete timelines i have to agree.
Trata las situaciones estresantes como lo haría 1 perro: si no puedes comértelo o jugar con ello, méate encima y lárgate!!!

Handle stressful situations as a dog would: if you can't eat it or play with it, pee on it and get out of there!!!
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6312
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: Enterprise-which timeline?

Post by McAvoy »

I personally believe there is no divergence between ENT 22nd century and TOS 23rd century and beyond. Yes, ENT presents contradictions from the earlier Trek shows on a few points for example the Klingons. But the series was never intended to be a new Trek universe. I think it's a just a popular fan theory to explain the differences between ENT and other series.

I mean really, somehow the ENT timeline is more advanced than originally because of Cochrane saw the shape of E-E?
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
Lt. Staplic
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 8094
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:25 am
Commendations: Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: Somewhere Among the Stars
Contact:

Re: Enterprise-which timeline?

Post by Lt. Staplic »

That's true none of this is in any way in agreement with canon, but I like to believe it anyway since it makes a whole hell of a lot more sense.
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
alexmann
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 912
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 6:52 pm
Location: I'm in your mind!

Re: Enterprise-which timeline?

Post by alexmann »

I can solve this problem. ST XI never happened.
ImageImage
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6312
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: Enterprise-which timeline?

Post by McAvoy »

Another possibility is that when The Sisko met Kirk in Trials and Tribble-ations, The Sisko challenged Kirk to a fight. It happened off screen because the sheer awesomeness couldn't be contained by mere cameras. The fight caused a ripple through space-time thus creating ENT, specifically when Kirk judo chop was blocked by a back handed pimp slap from The Sisko.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Enterprise-which timeline?

Post by Mikey »

Could you imagine if they both connected with a two-handed hammer punch of awesomeness at the same time? Such an occurrence is probably the source of creation for new universes.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
RK_Striker_JK_5
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 13086
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: New Hampshire
Contact:

Re: Enterprise-which timeline?

Post by RK_Striker_JK_5 »

Mikey wrote:Could you imagine if they both connected with a two-handed hammer punch of awesomeness at the same time? Such an occurrence is probably the source of creation for new universes.
Mikey... you might well have doomed us all!
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Enterprise-which timeline?

Post by Mikey »

RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:
Mikey wrote:Could you imagine if they both connected with a two-handed hammer punch of awesomeness at the same time? Such an occurrence is probably the source of creation for new universes.
Mikey... you might well have doomed us all!
If that is what kills me, I'll be ready to go.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Enterprise-which timeline?

Post by Deepcrush »

Kirk and Sisko fighting... pretty sure even the Borg would haul ass out of the galaxy to avoid the backlash.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
alexmann
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 912
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 6:52 pm
Location: I'm in your mind!

Re: Enterprise-which timeline?

Post by alexmann »

It could be a split off the mirror universe, where they got the Vulcan technology but eventually formed the federation and became a more advanced version of the one we know and love. That avoids more splits while provides another explanation.
ImageImage
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Enterprise-which timeline?

Post by Mikey »

Avoids? Assuming the involvement of the MU opens a whole new unsupported can of worms.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
alexmann
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 912
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 6:52 pm
Location: I'm in your mind!

Re: Enterprise-which timeline?

Post by alexmann »

I'm sorry, would you prefer I opened up this can of Whoop-Ass?
ImageImage
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Enterprise-which timeline?

Post by Deepcrush »

Alex vs Mikey... that would be extremely funny.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Enterprise-which timeline?

Post by Mikey »

alexmann wrote:I'm sorry, would you prefer I opened up this can of Whoop-Ass?
I add a whole can of whoop-ass to my coffee in the morning.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Post Reply