extent of humanity?

Trek Books, Games and General chat
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6225
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: extent of humanity?

Post by McAvoy »

The other possibility is that some humans just don't care for the whole Earth is Paradise thing so they set out on their own for perhaps a challenge. Look at it this way, if you were a billionaire and have everything you want or will ever need, where is the challenge? Money perhaps, but you start doing other stuff like charities, sponsoring research into areas of your own interest etc. The challenge of living is gone, so you find something else to challenge yourself.

Perhaps that is what caused the colonists to move and miners having a standard of living below that of Fed standards.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: extent of humanity?

Post by Mikey »

Good point. Normally I'd call that a bunch of hippie idealist BS, but it is in fact one of the primary reasons given for people joining Starfleet... so why wouldn't it be a reason for people with different tendencies to go colonize somewhere?
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6225
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: extent of humanity?

Post by McAvoy »

I agree that not everyone will want to go challenge themselves and in my example many billionaires just don't do jack shit except token donations. So a big question is what is the percentage of Earth's population who are out to do something or those are just deadwood.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: extent of humanity?

Post by Mikey »

Tough to say. Right now, for every Dick Cheney there is a Warren Buffett or Bill Gates. Can we draw a parallel, though, to a time when one's ability to contribute has absolutely no correlation with an idea of wealth? Like I said, your point is extra-valid because we know that in the 'Trek universe idealistic notions like self-betterment, need for a personal challenge, etc., are considered valid reasons for doing other things - so why not colonization?
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6225
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: extent of humanity?

Post by McAvoy »

That was my point. I just seriosuly doubt every single human on Earth has that ideal. I always take whatever Picard's Hippy Earth statements with a grain of salt because he always seemed to have chugged down the Federation koolaide.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: extent of humanity?

Post by Mikey »

McAvoy wrote:That was my point. I just seriosuly doubt every single human on Earth has that ideal. I always take whatever Picard's Hippy Earth statements with a grain of salt because he always seemed to have chugged down the Federation koolaide.
Of course not. But if 5% or 10% do adopt that philosophy, that's more than enough to fuel Starfleet as well as colonization efforts of anywhere from 100,000 - 1,000,000 apiece.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6225
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: extent of humanity?

Post by McAvoy »

Exactly. But spread that over 250+ years of humans colonizing space, then I can see some older colonies having very large populations.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: extent of humanity?

Post by Mark »

Ah hah, but at what point do these populations take it from colonly status to planet status, with full Federation representation???
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
Sonic Glitch
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6026
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot

Re: extent of humanity?

Post by Sonic Glitch »

Mark wrote:Ah hah, but at what point do these populations take it from colonly status to planet status, with full Federation representation???
Much like how territories were incorporated into the U.S. there's probably some sort of arbitrary population number -- and/or a referendum or voting process of some such.
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: extent of humanity?

Post by Mikey »

Because we're talking about a comparison with the total population of humankind in the galaxy, I'd think the determining factor wouldn't be population size so much as the colony becoming independently viable. When it can operate without external support from "home" (as opposed to trade agreements) and/or has a measurable GNP, it should be eligible for constituent status.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
sunnyside
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2711
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 5:35 pm

Re: extent of humanity?

Post by sunnyside »

You know I'm not so sure that the "Devil in the Dark" colony was actually part of the federation. I seem to recall stuff about "If the federation wants their minerals" and getting rich.

I think the operation annihilate colony episode had some comment about their being no Federation contact for some long period of time.

The point being those seem like odd things to say since Earth is a part of the Federation.

So I wonder if the idea is that colonies were formed during the pre-federation phase of earths development, which I don't believe was nearly so utopic and so people might have been much more likely to want to fan out.

As for independence, I'm pretty sure a recurring theme across a lot of episodes from TOS and Enterprise at the least was that colonies wouldn't be visited for exceedingly long periods of time. So it would seem they'd have to be functionally independents nearly from the get go. At least in the sense that they could trade for what they needed.
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: extent of humanity?

Post by Graham Kennedy »

The Deneva colony had gone quiet a year before.

It does seem that during TOS, the lines of contact and communication were very slow. The Enterprise would often be chasing up something long after it happened - years, even decades.

Happened in TNG on occasion, too. Angel One for instance - they were investigating a freighter which was described as "seven years overdue". I like to hope that if something happens to me it wouldn't take seven years before somebody came to help!
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
RK_Striker_JK_5
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 12986
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: New Hampshire
Contact:

Re: extent of humanity?

Post by RK_Striker_JK_5 »

GrahamKennedy wrote:The Deneva colony had gone quiet a year before.

It does seem that during TOS, the lines of contact and communication were very slow. The Enterprise would often be chasing up something long after it happened - years, even decades.

Happened in TNG on occasion, too. Angel One for instance - they were investigating a freighter which was described as "seven years overdue". I like to hope that if something happens to me it wouldn't take seven years before somebody came to help!
Well, especially in TOS, starfleet seemed really stretched to the limit, especially where the Enterprise was operating.
Sonic Glitch
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6026
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot

Re: extent of humanity?

Post by Sonic Glitch »

RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:
GrahamKennedy wrote:The Deneva colony had gone quiet a year before.

It does seem that during TOS, the lines of contact and communication were very slow. The Enterprise would often be chasing up something long after it happened - years, even decades.

Happened in TNG on occasion, too. Angel One for instance - they were investigating a freighter which was described as "seven years overdue". I like to hope that if something happens to me it wouldn't take seven years before somebody came to help!
Well, especially in TOS, starfleet seemed really stretched to the limit, especially where the Enterprise was operating.
Well... It was operating "where no man had gone before" ;)
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: extent of humanity?

Post by Captain Seafort »

Sonic Glitch wrote:Well... It was operating "where no man had gone before" ;)
Allegedly. More often it was "where no man had ever come back from before".
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Post Reply