40k Horus Heresy - What if?

Post Reply
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

40k Horus Heresy - What if?

Post by Deepcrush »

What if...

The Horus Heresy has been defeated at Holy Terra. History plays out to this point as normal with one exception. YOU are the one in place to decide the future of the IoM. How would you handle the Fall of Horus, the Ascension of the Emperor to the Golden Throne and control of the Imperium during the closing year of the Civil War?
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: 40k Horus Heresy - What if?

Post by Mikey »

Wait... the Heresy was defeated. If you mean Pius, Sanguinius, and the Emperor were NOT struck down on the Emperor's barge, then there wouldn't be any ascension to the Golden Throne at all.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: 40k Horus Heresy - What if?

Post by Captain Seafort »

Mikey wrote:Wait... the Heresy was defeated. If you mean Pius, Sanguinius, and the Emperor were NOT struck down on the Emperor's barge, then there wouldn't be any ascension to the Golden Throne at all.
I think he's talking OOU with you as the author.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: 40k Horus Heresy - What if?

Post by Mikey »

Yeah, I got it now. The defeat of the Heresy was part of the set-up, not part of the "what if." Well, for starters I'd have Malcador tell everyone to STFU and stop acting like they knew what the Emperor would have wanted. Have him take the Emperor's directive to form the Inquisition and set it up, not superimposed on the various adepti, but in direct oversight of them. Instead of an Imperium-by-committee, have the different organizations of the IoM be part of a functional but supervised body.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: 40k Horus Heresy - What if?

Post by Deepcrush »

What about the Imperial Army, Imperial Navy and Astartes Legions?
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: 40k Horus Heresy - What if?

Post by Mikey »

Deepcrush wrote:What about the Imperial Army, Imperial Navy and Astartes Legions?
Army and Navy: well, the mass defection of huge amounts of each is definitely a concern... I just don't see how turning them (the Army in particular, in becoming the IG) into a huge morass of incoherent and less-manageable individual units helps. As it turned out, it didn't. There are still renegades, not to mention the gue'vesa. The Emperor's final instructions to Malcador were specifically and directly made toward the prevention of such things - as such, the group which Malcador created in response to those instructions could have alleviated such concerns if placed in a superintendent - rather than skulking watchdog - role. I also like to think that Malcador taking over more firmly would have led to another of the Emperor's wishes being carried out - that is, the practice of never turning the ascended Emperor into a popular deity.

Astartes: Same thing, mostly. First, Guilliman and the Codex Astartes should never have had any particular say over the deployment of another primarch's legion. Again, dividing the legions into chapters has just meant that renegade chapters go traitor 1,000 at a time.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: 40k Horus Heresy - What if?

Post by Deepcrush »

Captain Seafort wrote:
Mikey wrote:Wait... the Heresy was defeated. If you mean Pius, Sanguinius, and the Emperor were NOT struck down on the Emperor's barge, then there wouldn't be any ascension to the Golden Throne at all.
I think he's talking OOU with you as the author.
I meant as you being in charge. GEoM heads up to face Horus and when he does points to you and says "if I don't come back, show them the way".
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Atekimogus
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 1193
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:10 pm
Location: Vienna

Re: 40k Horus Heresy - What if?

Post by Atekimogus »

Mikey wrote: Astartes: Same thing, mostly. First, Guilliman and the Codex Astartes should never have had any particular say over the deployment of another primarch's legion. Again, dividing the legions into chapters has just meant that renegade chapters go traitor 1,000 at a time.
Have you by any chance read the latest Horus Heresy books? Especially "Age of Darkness"? I must say I really like how they are setting things up for the Ultramarines there. First there is a nice short-story which describes the Codex Astartes (as it is currently developed by Guilliman) completely different to what we have in the 40th millenium, less bible, more military supercomputer analysis tool.

Also there are quite a few hints about Guilliman, his views as to what HE thinks who the heir of the Emperor should have been as well as hints as to why the Ultramarines where a bit late to the siege of terra ("ups, well now that we are here we take over, everyone ok with it?").

In short, I like the direction they are taking there, adding a bit much needed depth to the archetypical arch-loyal goody two shoes chapter, and managing to make the arguable most boring primarch quite interesting and cool.
I'm Commander Shepard and this is my favorite store on the Citadel.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: 40k Horus Heresy - What if?

Post by Mikey »

I haven't.. but I do like this take on the Codex:
1d4chan.org/wiki wrote:While the Codex Astartes has a few good points on how Space Marines should fight, it contains a truckload of a lot of bad points on even how an army should be. Due to Guilliman's unending paranoia over the fact that none of his brothers are possibly loyal anymore (and to cover up on how fucking useless he was during most of the Horus Heresy), he made it so that he ruined the Space Marines entirely...
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: 40k Horus Heresy - What if?

Post by Deepcrush »

I don't think that Guilliman ruined the Astartes. A lot of what he did does make sense, setting up a uniform ideal and tactical doctrine for the Imperium as a whole is a good thing. Splitting the Legions is also not a major problem since even after ten thousand years the different chapters do rather well with working together on large scales.

The problem with the Codex is the attempt by Guilliman to make it Law, rather then just a guide. The problem by extension is Guilliman and his belief that its his will or nothing at all. Though Russ showed him his place nicely...
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Post Reply