Time for building
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 6:52 pm
- Location: I'm in your mind!
Time for building
I was thinking, just how long does it take to build the ships in star trek? I think together we could come to a reasonable conclusion. I would like to start us off with some complete guesses:
#Galaxy - 3 years
#Intrepid - 2 years
#Defiant - 2 months
#Akira - 2 years
#Ambassador - 2 years
#Danube - 2 weeks
#Nebula - 3 years
#Nova - 1 year
#Prometheus - 2 years
#Sovereign - 2.5 years
These are all probably way off but they will do as a starting point. What do you guys think?
#EDIT Revised times.
#Galaxy - 3 years
#Intrepid - 2 years
#Defiant - 2 months
#Akira - 2 years
#Ambassador - 2 years
#Danube - 2 weeks
#Nebula - 3 years
#Nova - 1 year
#Prometheus - 2 years
#Sovereign - 2.5 years
These are all probably way off but they will do as a starting point. What do you guys think?
#EDIT Revised times.
Last edited by alexmann on Fri Feb 10, 2012 6:41 pm, edited 2 times in total.
![Image](http://i1178.photobucket.com/albums/x362/alexmann97/westwood2.png)
![Image](http://i1178.photobucket.com/albums/x362/alexmann97/halow-1.png)
Re: Time for building
The only one I can remember having a specific time was the NX... first one took 5 or so years (I think) and the second took 2.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 13003
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact:
Re: Time for building
Next to impossible to figure out, methinks.
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: Time for building
The E-D was brand new in 2364, Stardate 41000 or so, and yet apparently according to Booby Trap they were still fiddling with the design of the power systems as late as 40174, less than a year or so earlier. I'd guess that building one took no more than 3 or 4 years.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: Time for building
About the ballpark I'd have picked.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 6:52 pm
- Location: I'm in your mind!
Re: Time for building
I put the Sovereign as shorter than the Galaxy as I think there would have been advances in ship building methods.
![Image](http://i1178.photobucket.com/albums/x362/alexmann97/westwood2.png)
![Image](http://i1178.photobucket.com/albums/x362/alexmann97/halow-1.png)
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: Time for building
Sovereigns are also a fair bit smaller.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Time for building
About the same length, but the Sov has less than half the volume of the GCS.alexmann wrote:I thought they were around the same size?
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15368
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Re: Time for building
Assuming unlimited supply of parts ect I think they could build any capital ship in under ayear.
I think the issue really is that it takes lot of time and highly skilled labor to build the large warp reactors and nacelles.
BuIdling the hull and body with automated systems helping would be dead quick and easy.
It's the systems that slow them down.
I think the issue really is that it takes lot of time and highly skilled labor to build the large warp reactors and nacelles.
BuIdling the hull and body with automated systems helping would be dead quick and easy.
It's the systems that slow them down.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Re: Time for building
Building the main hull of any ship really doesn't take that long. It's the fitting out and training the crew for that ship that takes the longest.
That holodeck program in Booby Trap showed presumably the E-D still in a state of construction. So building the ship may not be an issue.
That holodeck program in Booby Trap showed presumably the E-D still in a state of construction. So building the ship may not be an issue.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 6:52 pm
- Location: I'm in your mind!
Re: Time for building
Considering that the crew training is done completely seperately, with enough people working on it, you would probably be able to build any one of these in less than a year.
![Image](http://i1178.photobucket.com/albums/x362/alexmann97/westwood2.png)
![Image](http://i1178.photobucket.com/albums/x362/alexmann97/halow-1.png)