George Lucas Speech on Protecting Films From Alterations

George Lucas Speech on Protecting Films From Alterations

Postby Nutso » Fri Sep 02, 2011 4:12 pm

...in 1988...before Congress.
http://www.iwatchstuff.com/2011/09/geor ... eservi.php

Image

It's easier to read if you click the link.
Nowadays--especially with the upcoming, unnecessarily-updated release of Star Wars on a new format--George Lucas is rightfully seen as the ultimate money-grubbing revisionist, a man able to add CGI Ewok eyelids with the push of a button and willing to wield that power all too liberally, tossing around "NOOOO!!!"s with the cavalier attitude of bored retiree perpetually watering his yard.

But it wasn't always so. Back in 1988, Lucas delivered a speech to Congress--as dug up and recounted by Peter Lopez and SaveStarWars (via)--declaring the need to federally protect films from being altered, because, as he saw it, "People who alter or destroy works of art and our cultural heritage for profit or as an exercise of power are barbarians." Ut oh, George, I think you might have altered art at some point! In the statement--spoken before any of his Special Edition revisions, back when Lucas could still comfortably button his shirts--Lucas, I should note, was specifically referring to outside parties being granted the right to make alterations, like adding an add for Zookeeper to a series, for example; he makes it clear that those rights should still be reserved for the artists themselves. But considering how Lucas isn't even the screenwriter nor director for two of "his" films, and looking at the way he passionately speaks of preserving films, as-is, for future generations, his words still hold a nice little irony swamp for you to soak in with CGI Yoda. Here's a transcript of the full, sad speech:

"My name is George Lucas. I am a writer, director, and producer of motion pictures and Chairman of the Board of Lucasfilm Ltd., a multi-faceted entertainment corporation.

I am not here today as a writer-director, or as a producer, or as the chairman of a corporation. I've come as a citizen of what I believe to be a great society that is in need of a moral anchor to help define and protect its intellectual and cultural heritage. It is not being protected.

The destruction of our film heritage, which is the focus of concern today, is only the tip of the iceberg. American law does not protect our painters, sculptors, recording artists, authors, or filmmakers from having their lifework distorted, and their reputation ruined. If something is not done now to clearly state the moral rights of artists, current and future technologies will alter, mutilate, and destroy for future generations the subtle human truths and highest human feeling that talented individuals within our society have created.

A copyright is held in trust by its owner until it ultimately reverts to public domain. American works of art belong to the American public; they are part of our cultural history.
People who alter or destroy works of art and our cultural heritage for profit or as an exercise of power are barbarians, and if the laws of the United States continue to condone this behavior, history will surely classify us as a barbaric society. The preservation of our cultural heritage may not seem to be as politically sensitive an issue as "when life begins" or "when it should be appropriately terminated," but it is important because it goes to the heart of what sets mankind apart. Creative expression is at the core of our humanness. Art is a distinctly human endeavor. We must have respect for it if we are to have any respect for the human race.

These current defacement are just the beginning. Today, engineers with their computers can add color to black-and-white movies, change the soundtrack, speed up the pace, and add or subtract material to the philosophical tastes of the copyright holder. Tomorrow, more advanced technology will be able to replace actors with "fresher faces," or alter dialogue and change the movement of the actor's lips to match. It will soon be possible to create a new "original" negative with whatever changes or alterations the copyright holder of the moment desires. The copyright holders, so far, have not been completely diligent in preserving the original negatives of films they control. In order to reconstruct old negatives, many archivists have had to go to Eastern bloc countries where American films have been better preserved.

In the future it will become even easier for old negatives to become lost and be "replaced" by new altered negatives. This would be a great loss to our society. Our cultural history must not be allowed to be rewritten.

There is nothing to stop American films, records, books, and paintings from being sold to a foreign entity or egotistical gangsters and having them change our cultural heritage to suit their personal taste.

I accuse the companies and groups, who say that American law is sufficient, of misleading the Congress and the People for their own economic self-interest.
I accuse the corporations, who oppose the moral rights of the artist, of being dishonest and insensitive to American cultural heritage and of being interested only in their quarterly bottom line, and not in the long-term interest of the Nation.

The public's interest is ultimately dominant over all other interests. And the proof of that is that even a copyright law only permits the creators and their estate a limited amount of time to enjoy the economic fruits of that work.

There are those who say American law is sufficient. That's an outrage! It's not sufficient! If it were sufficient, why would I be here? Why would John Houston have been so studiously ignored when he protested the colorization of "The Maltese Falcon?" Why are films cut up and butchered?

Attention should be paid to this question of our soul, and not simply to accounting procedures. Attention should be paid to the interest of those who are yet unborn, who should be able to see this generation as it saw itself, and the past generation as it saw itself.

I hope you have the courage to lead America in acknowledging the importance of American art to the human race, and accord the proper protection for the creators of that art--NOOOOOOOO!!!, as it is accorded them in much of the rest of the world communities."

Sorry, I made a slight amendment at the end there, but all indications are he would have wanted it that way in the first place had the technologies allowed it.

"Bible, Wrath of Khan, what's the difference?"
Stan - South Park
User avatar
Nutso
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 8:58 pm

Re: George Lucas Speech on Protecting Films From Alterations

Postby Mark » Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:36 pm

Well, I remember when he said "That was it, no more."


Then announced he was doing three more movies.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
User avatar
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
 
Posts: 17671
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:49 pm
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: George Lucas Speech on Protecting Films From Alterations

Postby Mikey » Fri Sep 02, 2011 6:36 pm

No conflict - he just forgot to say, "...um, except mine, when I feel like it." :P
"We've been over this. We don't shoot first and ask questions later."
"Of course! We never ask questions."
User avatar
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
 
Posts: 33311
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 2:04 am
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA

Re: George Lucas Speech on Protecting Films From Alterations

Postby RK_Striker_JK_5 » Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:16 pm

He's just being a money-grubbing hypocrite.
User avatar
RK_Striker_JK_5
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
 
Posts: 9277
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 4:27 am
Location: New Hampshire

Re: George Lucas Speech on Protecting Films From Alterations

Postby colmquinn » Sat Sep 03, 2011 2:11 am

RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:He's just being a money-grubbing hypocrite.


We need a thumbs up icon.
But I can't throw, I throw like a geek!
User avatar
colmquinn
Commander
Commander
 
Posts: 1496
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 9:20 pm
Location: Waiting in the long grass

Re: George Lucas Speech on Protecting Films From Alterations

Postby Tyyr » Wed Sep 07, 2011 7:38 pm

I just don't get why he doesn't leave well enough alone.

I wouldn't be so bothered with it if beside the "Special-George-Lucas-Fucked-Up-Edition" Blu-Rays there was a set of the original unedited movies.
User avatar
Tyyr
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
 
Posts: 10654
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh

Re: George Lucas Speech on Protecting Films From Alterations

Postby Mikey » Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:43 am

Tyyr wrote:I just don't get why he doesn't leave well enough alone.


My guess? An arcane combination of plain ol' greed, the realization that James Cameron has eclipsed him in figures, and good old-fashioned art-school OCD.
"We've been over this. We don't shoot first and ask questions later."
"Of course! We never ask questions."
User avatar
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
 
Posts: 33311
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 2:04 am
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA

Re: George Lucas Speech on Protecting Films From Alterations

Postby Tyyr » Thu Sep 08, 2011 12:45 pm

Greed? The man would make another billion just by re-releasing the OT with each new media update. He wouldn't have to spend a dime on Ewok eyelids.

Probably art school OCD and if you listen to him in the PT commentary the guy is obsessed with the idea of putting in all kinds of things that "tie" the OT and PT together. "It rhymes."
User avatar
Tyyr
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
 
Posts: 10654
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh

Re: George Lucas Speech on Protecting Films From Alterations

Postby Mikey » Thu Sep 08, 2011 1:43 pm

That's why I don't listen to the commentary tracks.
"We've been over this. We don't shoot first and ask questions later."
"Of course! We never ask questions."
User avatar
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
 
Posts: 33311
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 2:04 am
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA

Re: George Lucas Speech on Protecting Films From Alterations

Postby RK_Striker_JK_5 » Thu Sep 08, 2011 8:44 pm

He's seeking perfection, methinks. Problem is, it doesn't exist. The journey there's not the problem, so long as you realize the former.
User avatar
RK_Striker_JK_5
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
 
Posts: 9277
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 4:27 am
Location: New Hampshire

Re: George Lucas Speech on Protecting Films From Alterations

Postby McAvoy » Thu Sep 08, 2011 8:52 pm

Problem with perfectionists, is that it's never perfection.

I do understand in fixing matte lines or small things here and there. But the guy is making huge alterations and constantly tinkering with things that doesn't need it.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
 
Posts: 4091
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: George Lucas Speech on Protecting Films From Alterations

Postby Mikey » Thu Sep 08, 2011 11:19 pm

"If everything was perfect, it wouldn't be." - Yogi Berra
"We've been over this. We don't shoot first and ask questions later."
"Of course! We never ask questions."
User avatar
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
 
Posts: 33311
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 2:04 am
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA

Re: George Lucas Speech on Protecting Films From Alterations

Postby RK_Striker_JK_5 » Thu Sep 08, 2011 11:27 pm

And ten laugh points to Yogi Berra, with five to Mikey for posting the quote.
User avatar
RK_Striker_JK_5
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
 
Posts: 9277
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 4:27 am
Location: New Hampshire


Return to Star Wars

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests