http://www.redlettermedia.com/sith.html This is from Mr. Plinkett's own site. All three parts are here and each part is over 30 minutes long.
His prologue resonates with me.
Red Letter Media Reviews Star Wars Episode III
Red Letter Media Reviews Star Wars Episode III
"Bible, Wrath of Khan, what's the difference?"
Stan - South Park
Stan - South Park
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10654
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
- Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh
Re: Red Letter Media Reviews Star Wars Episode III
Actually it's well over an hour.
He's got an interesting point about how the whole thing is disjointed and just doesn't seem to know what it wants to do... and how fucking obvious it was that Anakin was seriously messed up that even a non-force user could notice it.
He's got an interesting point about how the whole thing is disjointed and just doesn't seem to know what it wants to do... and how fucking obvious it was that Anakin was seriously messed up that even a non-force user could notice it.
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: Red Letter Media Reviews Star Wars Episode III
I saw a review, can't remember if it was this one, that zeroed in on Padme's "Oh Annakin, you've changed!" line. Changed how, exactly? In Episode 2 he TOLD her that everybody should be forced to live under one strong leader. In episode 2 he TOLD her that he'd just slaughtered a bunch of helpless women and children. In Episode 2 he constantly complained that everyone was trying to keep him down and he wanted more power. Annakin was absolutely consistent in the type of person he was throughout Ep 2 and 3, it's just that it was convenient for the plot for everybody to ignore it or make excuses for it up until now.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Re: Red Letter Media Reviews Star Wars Episode III
That sounds like Confused Matthew.GrahamKennedy wrote:I saw a review, can't remember if it was this one, that zeroed in on Padme's "Oh Annakin, you've changed!" line. Changed how, exactly? In Episode 2 he TOLD her that everybody should be forced to live under one strong leader. In episode 2 he TOLD her that he'd just slaughtered a bunch of helpless women and children. In Episode 2 he constantly complained that everyone was trying to keep him down and he wanted more power. Annakin was absolutely consistent in the type of person he was throughout Ep 2 and 3, it's just that it was convenient for the plot for everybody to ignore it or make excuses for it up until now.
"Bible, Wrath of Khan, what's the difference?"
Stan - South Park
Stan - South Park
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 13027
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact:
Re: Red Letter Media Reviews Star Wars Episode III
There's only so many ways to point out the same gaping plot holes and errors in logic, to be fair.
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: Red Letter Media Reviews Star Wars Episode III
Could well have been, I rather like CM.Nutso wrote:That sounds like Confused Matthew.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Re: Red Letter Media Reviews Star Wars Episode III
As do I, I personally like Confused Matthew, not so much Red Letter Media, his voice puts me to sleep.
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: Red Letter Media Reviews Star Wars Episode III
I gotta say though, I thought CM's 2001 review was utter tripe. And the fact that he kept on dissing 2001 through most of his 2010 review annoyed me, too.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...