A World Without Chernobyl

Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

A World Without Chernobyl

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Something that popped into my head while discussing the viability of nuclear-powered aircraft-carrier dirigibles over in the BSG forum (TR-116 to the rescue!). Let's say that, for whatever reason, nuclear power doesn't become as controversial an issue as it is today. Instead, we keep the 1950's view of it being the way of the future and something that should be embraced, and the majority of people are all for increasing its use and commonness in everyday life.

What would things look like in such a world? Would it even be all that different from reality, or would things change quite a bit?
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: A World Without Chernobyl

Post by Tsukiyumi »

I'm sure we'd be using a lot more of it.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Tyyr
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10654
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh

Re: A World Without Chernobyl

Post by Tyyr »

I'm not sure it would change all that much. You'd likely have a lot less interest in renewables and perhaps more interest in things like electric cars and the like.
User avatar
Reliant121
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 12263
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm

Re: A World Without Chernobyl

Post by Reliant121 »

I'd say there would be less of the whole global warming debate. Sure, there'd be some inevitable global warming from combustion engines, but a major contributing factor, electricity generation, would probably be much more nuclear controlled.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: A World Without Chernobyl

Post by Mikey »

I'm not sure too much would be different. Most people outside of Ukraine don't realize - or at least, don't pay any mind to - the fact that the area around Chernobyl is militarily-cordoned, and requires a time limit in hours for visitation, even for people in rad suits in the center of the area.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: A World Without Chernobyl

Post by Aaron »

You should check this out, it's a website of a chick who rides her crotch rocket through the area.

Honestly, I think the idea that nuke=bad was already in the public consciousness before hand, Three Mile Island and dozens of films where bugs grow to ludicrous size from radiation hadn't helped things.
Tyyr
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10654
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh

Re: A World Without Chernobyl

Post by Tyyr »

Exactly, TMI and the China syndrome are the root of the anti-nuclear feeling in this country. Ironic since TMI was a stunning example of how safe, to the public, nuclear power really is.
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: A World Without Chernobyl

Post by Aaron »

Yeah, and folks totally ignore all the crap gas, coal and oil plants shat out.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: A World Without Chernobyl

Post by Mikey »

Right, TMI was a perfect example of how these things safely respond to a problem.
IIRC, only the school and town right around the plant require rad suits. There's still a time limit for people within a 20 - 25 mile radius, though.

But you're right - there was anti-nuke sentiment well before Chernobyl (except for things like the USS Nautilus, because it's OK to do something bad if it means we can stick it to those red bastards. :lol:)
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: A World Without Chernobyl

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Well the Chernobyl mention was just for the title. I actually meant "what if there was no anti-nuclear hysteria at all".
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: A World Without Chernobyl

Post by Mikey »

Sionnach Glic wrote:Well the Chernobyl mention was just for the title. I actually meant "what if there was no anti-nuclear hysteria at all".
In that case, we'd be in even better shape than just having widespread nuclear power. Nuclear power generation would have become fairly commonplace, if not ubiquitous, in the two to three decades after the Nautilus; and by now, fast reactors and small-pellet reactors would be pretty common... which would do a lot to mitigate the downside of high levels of nuclear power generation.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: A World Without Chernobyl

Post by Aaron »

Oh I wasn't disagreeing with you MIkey, just pimping a cool site that does a fair bit to show just how long lasting the effects where. It's a testament to human stupidity.
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: A World Without Chernobyl

Post by Tsukiyumi »

Mikey wrote:In that case, we'd be in even better shape than just having widespread nuclear power. Nuclear power generation would have become fairly commonplace, if not ubiquitous, in the two to three decades after the Nautilus; ...
I want a nuclear powered car.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Tyyr
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10654
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh

Re: A World Without Chernobyl

Post by Tyyr »

Tsukiyumi wrote:I want a nuclear powered car.
It's a Ford.
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: A World Without Chernobyl

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Actually, it's a Cadillac. And it's pretty sexy.

Image
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Post Reply