nTrek shields

Discussion of the new run of Star Trek XI+ movies and any spinoffs

Re: nTrek shields

Postby Avatar2312 » Thu Jun 25, 2009 11:06 pm

It's possible and plausible that the shields didn't respond to the impact of the saucer-fragment. Impact speed may have been to low. Still it was high enough to scratch the hull with its sharp edges. And I don't recall any occasion where the TOS Constitution had to withstand impact of a massive hull fragment.
Last edited by Avatar2312 on Thu Jun 25, 2009 11:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Whoever finds errors in my English is welcome to keep them. I am Austrian.
User avatar
Avatar2312
Senior chief petty officer
Senior chief petty officer
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 9:53 pm

Re: nTrek shields

Postby Tsukiyumi » Thu Jun 25, 2009 11:08 pm

Mikey wrote:
Avatar2312 wrote:The shield-power-estimation of the XI Constitution is way too low compared to the TOS Constitution


But fits the evidence, IMHO. We saw lots of damage to the hull even through newly-raised shields.


And it's still speculation. The Narada's weapons might be extremely powerful, as opposed to the shields somehow being weaker than the Prime-timeline Connie. I tend toward that end of the argument, especially since the Narada was apparently even a powerful ship by 24th century standards in the Countdown comics. Even if we ignore that, the evidence could still go either way.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
User avatar
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
 
Posts: 21284
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 1:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!

Re: nTrek shields

Postby stitch626 » Fri Jun 26, 2009 12:19 am

And we must remember the E-A's hull was scorched by Klingon torps of the same time period, imagine the damage it would have had from a torpedo 100 years in the future.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
User avatar
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
 
Posts: 9393
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: Romulus

Re: nTrek shields

Postby Mikey » Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:33 pm

All true. I'm just saying that the visual appearance of the impacts and subsequent explosions looked like an attack on an unshielded hull.
"You fought with Captain Reynolds in the war?"
"I fought with a lot of people in the war."
"And your husband?"
"I fight with him sometimes, too."
User avatar
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
 
Posts: 32764
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 2:04 am
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA

Re: nTrek shields

Postby Foxfyre » Sat Jun 27, 2009 7:32 am

Hmmmm I would assume that the shields were stronger that the TOS connie, with an arms race going on and such.
Genius insania et conseri manum
User avatar
Foxfyre
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
 
Posts: 989
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 4:16 am
Location: TEXAS!!!!!!

Re: nTrek shields

Postby stitch626 » Sat Jun 27, 2009 5:16 pm

Mikey wrote:All true. I'm just saying that the visual appearance of the impacts and subsequent explosions looked like an attack on an unshielded hull.

One thing though that bugs me... in the scene where the E is taking out the torps so Spock can ram the ship, it didn't look like there was any hull damage.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
User avatar
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
 
Posts: 9393
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: Romulus

Re: nTrek shields

Postby Mark » Sun Jun 28, 2009 4:37 am

Well, as was mentioned MANY times before...............it's a work in progress, and not likely to have anymore light shone on it till the next movie, I'd say.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
User avatar
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
 
Posts: 17671
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:49 pm
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: nTrek shields

Postby Lazar » Sun Jun 28, 2009 4:39 am

Well there is that TM that they're apparently working on.
"There was also a large horse in the room, taking up most of it."
User avatar
Lazar
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 2232
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:29 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: nTrek shields

Postby Mark » Sun Jun 28, 2009 4:48 am

There is???? It's be backstage info at best, but still better than what we've got now...............I hope it's done Mr Scott's Guide to the Enterprise style.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
User avatar
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
 
Posts: 17671
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:49 pm
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: nTrek shields

Postby Lazar » Sun Jun 28, 2009 4:51 am

Yeah, they mentioned it a while back on TrekMovie.
"There was also a large horse in the room, taking up most of it."
User avatar
Lazar
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 2232
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:29 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: nTrek shields

Postby Mark » Sun Jun 28, 2009 6:08 am

Dude, that'll be awesome!
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
User avatar
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
 
Posts: 17671
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:49 pm
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: nTrek shields

Postby Reliant121 » Sun Jun 28, 2009 8:24 am

heres hoping it'll clear up some of our fangasm arguments :D
"He was the best of us. They struck without provocation, there was no reason. Animals! Brutal! They deserve no mercy! Strike them down, follow them back to their base and kill all of them, all of them! No mercy!" - Delenn
User avatar
Reliant121
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
 
Posts: 11949
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Bridgemary, Gosport, Hampshire, UK, Somewhere vaguely in the vicinity of Europe.

Re: Remake

Postby dagadget » Mon Jul 06, 2009 4:17 pm

GrahamKennedy wrote:The nConnie entry still needs considerable work; it's a work in progress, and was said to be such when it was added.

As for shields... looking at the movie, you wouldn't even know the ship HAD shields. They sure didn't seem to do anything.


yes indeed you have a point both the Kelvin and the E did not seem to have much shielding
dagadget
Chief petty officer
Chief petty officer
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 9:13 pm
Location: Avon Park, Florida

Re: nTrek shields

Postby Avatar2312 » Mon Jul 06, 2009 6:29 pm

Against what?

The only time the shields were put to stress was, when borg modified torpedoes hit those ships, which were able to blast through shields of late 24th cent. vessels.

Interesting though... the Kelvin was attacked with some sort of MIRVs (although nothing of reentry was present :D ), while the Enterprise was shot at with a single warhead version.
Whoever finds errors in my English is welcome to keep them. I am Austrian.
User avatar
Avatar2312
Senior chief petty officer
Senior chief petty officer
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 9:53 pm

Re: nTrek shields

Postby Mikey » Mon Jul 06, 2009 7:07 pm

Avatar2312 wrote:when borg modified torpedoes hit those ships


:?

dagadget wrote:
GrahamKennedy wrote:The nConnie entry still needs considerable work; it's a work in progress, and was said to be such when it was added.

As for shields... looking at the movie, you wouldn't even know the ship HAD shields. They sure didn't seem to do anything.


yes indeed you have a point both the Kelvin and the E did not seem to have much shielding


That's what I was saying - every single shot seemed to impact the hull.
"You fought with Captain Reynolds in the war?"
"I fought with a lot of people in the war."
"And your husband?"
"I fight with him sometimes, too."
User avatar
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
 
Posts: 32764
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 2:04 am
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA

PreviousNext

Return to Abrams Universe

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests