GCS Vs 12" Cannons

Trek Books, Games and General chat
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: GCS Vs 12" Cannons

Post by Captain Seafort »

Deepcrush wrote:If he reported trouble after two hits. That could have been the 400GW. So then if the E-D was hit six times then the total would end at 1200GW.
You're getting energy and power mixed up - while the former can be simply added up, the latter can't, as it's time-averaged.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
m52nickerson
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 423
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:57 pm

Re: GCS Vs 12" Cannons

Post by m52nickerson »

Captain Seafort wrote:And if I shone a torch in your face and then punched you, would you doubt that was a KE attack? We have an explicit statement from Worf as to the nature of the impact - the light show was probably some kind of containment field.
Only if your fist was glowing! Even if it was a containment field that shot should have impacted the shields and continued or dispursted, instead it wraped around the shields much like the Breen energy weapon did in DS9.

Besides Worf could have been wrong. It was you that has said that the visuals should be held higher then the Dialoge.
Captain Seafort wrote:You're getting energy and power mixed up - while the former can be simply added up, the latter can't, as it's time-averaged.
Did you not add the wattage of the shells from the ship together at the begining of the thread?

I don't see why you could not add them up, each hit will reduce the overall streight of the shields, past a certain threshhold.
Give a man a fish he eats for a day........beat that man to death........you have an extra fish.
User avatar
Praeothmin
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 634
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:04 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: GCS Vs 12" Cannons

Post by Praeothmin »

The ship's sensors also registered that none of their previous shots were having any effects, yet the enemy ship was then destroyed by one torpedo at the end.
So?
So their sensors were fooled by the Douwd in the case of the ship's resistance, twice.
However, the damage to the E-D, including the collapse of the shields, would have been registered by internal sensors, rather than being a Douwd creation. Those sensors registered a 400 GW hit, which knocked out the shields.
Makes sense, especially when you factor in the very real injuries suffered by the crew, which were not Douwd induced.

I went over the numbers for fun.

A 1 Watt= 1 Joule / 1 second.

If the 400GW is kinetic energy, then it is most likely "Translational kinetic Energy", because the ship rocks when it is hit.

If so, then here goes:
400GW = 400 000 000 000 billion Watts.
If this is delivered in 1 second (which we'll assume for this calculation), then we're faced with 400GJ.

How fast would a 1000kg car need to go to have that kind of energy?
Let's see.
"Translational kinetic Energy"'s formula is as follows:
K.E. (kinetic energy) in joules = (m.v*v)/2, where "m" is the mass in kg, and "v" is the speed in meters/second.
v*v means "v" squared.

So, we have 400GJ = (1000 . v*v) / 2
That gives us 400GJ x 2 = (1000.v*v)
800GJ / 1000 = v*v m/s
The square root of 0.8G, or the square root of 800 000 000 = 28 284.3 m/s, or 101 823.48 km/h.

So 400GW is like being hit by a 1000kg car shot at 101 823.48 km/h.
The truth always depends on which side of the fence you're standing... ;)
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: GCS Vs 12" Cannons

Post by Captain Seafort »

I ran a few calculations earlier in the thread - 400GW is, more or less, the power of a broadside from Hipper class heavy cruiser. That, more or less, is where the title came from when this was split.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: GCS Vs 12" Cannons

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Out of curiousity, is that just the kinetic energy from the impact of the shells themselves, or does that also include any explosives in the shells?
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
User avatar
Praeothmin
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 634
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:04 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: GCS Vs 12" Cannons

Post by Praeothmin »

Captain Seafort wrote:I ran a few calculations earlier in the thread - 400GW is, more or less, the power of a broadside from Hipper class heavy cruiser. That, more or less, is where the title came from when this was split.
The only nitpick I have is that the Kinetic Energy, since you're using "muzzle velocity", is the enrgy at the gun's muzzle end.
Once we factor in atmospheric drag, and distance, this amount will drop.
So, if the E-D was at, say, 2 km, its shields might be able to survive the first volley... :mrgreen:
Rochey wrote:Out of curiousity, is that just the kinetic energy from the impact of the shells themselves, or does that also include any explosives in the shells?
Since we are using muzzle velocity, then this value is simple kinetic energy, and does not factor in the explosive effects...
The truth always depends on which side of the fence you're standing... ;)
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: GCS Vs 12" Cannons

Post by Aaron »

Praeothmin wrote:
The only nitpick I have is that the Kinetic Energy, since you're using "muzzle velocity", is the enrgy at the gun's muzzle end.
Once we factor in atmospheric drag, and distance, this amount will drop.
So, if the E-D was at, say, 2 km, its shields might be able to survive the first volley... :mrgreen:
:jawdrop: Uh...yeah, if the E-D was cruising around in atmosphere.
Rochey wrote:
Since we are using muzzle velocity, then this value is simple kinetic energy, and does not factor in the explosive effects...
I'd be curious to see what the energy of an HE shell for those guns are.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: GCS Vs 12" Cannons

Post by Captain Seafort »

Rochey wrote:Out of curiousity, is that just the kinetic energy from the impact of the shells themselves, or does that also include any explosives in the shells?
Just the power of the impact, based on muzzle velocity and the mass and length of the projectile.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
Praeothmin
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 634
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:04 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: GCS Vs 12" Cannons

Post by Praeothmin »

Cpl Kendall wrote: Uh...yeah, if the E-D was cruising around in atmosphere.
That was a joke... :lol:
Of course, if the E-D wasn't cruising around in the atmosphere, then we've have to wonder what an earth seaship was doing in space... Unless it was in an anime... :mrgreen:
Captain Seafort wrote:Just the power of the impact, based on muzzle velocity and the mass and length of the projectile.
That's pretty much what I said:
Since we are using muzzle velocity, then this value is simple kinetic energy, and does not factor in the explosive effects...
:takecover:
The truth always depends on which side of the fence you're standing... ;)
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: GCS Vs 12" Cannons

Post by Mikey »

Praeothmin wrote:Unless it was in an anime...
:laughroll:
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Post Reply