Tyyr wrote:I am starting to hate this discovery. If I have to hear one more dumbass cry, "Physics is wrong! Now we have to throw it all out!" I'm gonna choke a bitch.
GrahamKennedy wrote:I didn't suggest you were moronic.
<shrug> It's a process, and no telling where it will end. If the past is any guide we could still be trying to work this stuff out a thousand years from now.
Mikey wrote:Spoken like someone who equates "dumbass" with "different than me."
Engineers should be more open-minded and less elitist than that, though I suppose it's an occupational hazard.
True questions about the meaning of this alleged discovery aren't cries of witchcraft or charges against physics;
Tyyr wrote:True questions about this are just fine. I'm talking about the dumbasses who are declaring physics as a whole to now be suspect.
Lighthawk wrote:That you couldn't understand the context of a simple statement is your own damn fault. Especially given that no one in the thread had made a comment about physics being wrong and needing to be thrown out. Closest we got was you suggesting special relativity might be wrong (Aww, did him hurt your feelings?). Honestly, your attempts to keep twisting the exact wording of the comments is making you look like a far bigger fool than your original comment, which could have been passed off with no real notice by a simple "Oh, thought you were saying something else."
Give it a rest, this has gotten stupid even by the usual "Never surrender, never back down" debating style that is typical here.
Mikey wrote:Way to make a point about misunderstanding statements by citing your misunderstanding of my statement. Indeed, nobody in this thread had made a comment about physics being wrong - which begs the question of why a statement about people saying physics is wrong was included.
I do apologize if defending my position is bothering you; in the future, I'll make sure to PM you with any post I might be considering to make sure you're OK with it first.
If "giving it a rest" is your suggestion for debates, why exactly did you post the above?
Lighthawk wrote:No see, you're misunderstanding things again. That isn't my suggestion for debates, that was my suggest for you, personally, in regards to this individual debate.
Mikey wrote:Ah, very good. "You shouldn't speak if you disagree with me" is obviously at the heart of debate.
As an aside to LH: I hope you're not upset about our characters' interaction in the CoC game - that had nothing to do with you as a person, and was merely my attempt to "play it to the bone," as it were.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests