Is it wrong to burn books?
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Is it wrong to burn books?
Recently I was discussing the whole Qur'an burning thing on another forum. I expressed the view that whilst burning books is uncivilised and automatically makes a person an ass, he's free to do it and he's in no way responsible for what happened in Afghanistan afterwards.
I still believe that last part, but a comment I saw on youtube recently got me to thinking - what's so special about books? Centuries ago there would be only a few copies of a book. Even in the printing press age you could burn so many copies that a copy was hard to find.
But computers have fundamentally changed that. Books are now viruses, so long as one copy remains anybody can make millions. The burning of books was increasingly symbolic, but now it's a totally empty symbol.
That youtube comment I mentioned - the guy is making a point about this by getting an old hard drive and downloading a copy of the Qu'ran onto it. He's going to make a million copies of the file, and then burn the drive. His point is partly that he's free to destroy whatever he likes, but also that in this age, such destruction doesn't actually accomplish anything.
So I'm rethinking my position. I never thought I'd say it, but I'm coming to think it's okay to burn books! What say you?
I still believe that last part, but a comment I saw on youtube recently got me to thinking - what's so special about books? Centuries ago there would be only a few copies of a book. Even in the printing press age you could burn so many copies that a copy was hard to find.
But computers have fundamentally changed that. Books are now viruses, so long as one copy remains anybody can make millions. The burning of books was increasingly symbolic, but now it's a totally empty symbol.
That youtube comment I mentioned - the guy is making a point about this by getting an old hard drive and downloading a copy of the Qu'ran onto it. He's going to make a million copies of the file, and then burn the drive. His point is partly that he's free to destroy whatever he likes, but also that in this age, such destruction doesn't actually accomplish anything.
So I'm rethinking my position. I never thought I'd say it, but I'm coming to think it's okay to burn books! What say you?
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Is it wrong to burn books?
To me, book burning is just another way of admitting you're afraid of information. Its a sign of cowardice that I feel is beyond forgiveness, not that I'm a forgiving person mind you, and shouldn't be accepted ever.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Re: Is it wrong to burn books?
I think it's perfectly fine to burn books, I don't care, they make good kindling...
The larger thing I have a problem with is people doing it in order to fundamentally reduce a thought to the point that it deserves to be burnt, be it a book, a flag, or a hard drive. The Qur'an burning is basically him telling everyone that the Muslim faith doesn't deserve to exist, because it's so worthless, which I have a problem with.
The larger thing I have a problem with is people doing it in order to fundamentally reduce a thought to the point that it deserves to be burnt, be it a book, a flag, or a hard drive. The Qur'an burning is basically him telling everyone that the Muslim faith doesn't deserve to exist, because it's so worthless, which I have a problem with.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Is it wrong to burn books?
That's the thing. Burning a book is no longer an action which is likely to have an appreciable impact on the dissemination of any thought; but it's highly symbolic of things like Nick mentions above, or of tyrannical Orwellian thought-monitoring. The significance of burning the Qu'ran wasn't lost on anyone, no matter how easy it was to replace the physical copy - nor is the connotation gotten from the societies which are historically linked with book-burning (i.e., the Nazis, the Spenglerian Dominican Order, etc.)
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 13001
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact:
Re: Is it wrong to burn books?
It's symbolic of wanting to kill an idea.
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: Is it wrong to burn books?
That's what I mean, though. Yes it's symbolic of wanting to get rid of an idea... but the symbol has become a futile, empty one. Now when I see somebody burn a book, my though is not "they are trying to get rid of an idea", but rather "there's a person who doesn't quite grasp what century he's in."
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 13001
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact:
Re: Is it wrong to burn books?
Sometimes symbolism trumps the reality.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 21747
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
- Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
- Contact:
Re: Is it wrong to burn books?
As much of a scumbag the "pastor" in question is, I doubt even he thought burning a single Qur'an would do more than propagate his message of intolerance and hatred.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Re: Is it wrong to burn books?
But it's not that he's trying to get rid of an idea, he's trying to say that it doesn't deserve to exist. I know there doesn't sound to be a difference, but there is.
Trying to get rid of it is saying that it may have had it's time and place, but now is neither for it and it now needs to be gone, whereas saying it never should have existed is going to the extent of saying the idea is so disgusting that it must be fully destroyed, it's not tearing it to pieces, it's literally changing it's chemical components making them simply carbon. So it's saying that it is intolerable and should be completely eliminated from existence.
Trying to get rid of it is saying that it may have had it's time and place, but now is neither for it and it now needs to be gone, whereas saying it never should have existed is going to the extent of saying the idea is so disgusting that it must be fully destroyed, it's not tearing it to pieces, it's literally changing it's chemical components making them simply carbon. So it's saying that it is intolerable and should be completely eliminated from existence.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Is it wrong to burn books?
Then you're in the minority. Symbols bear great meaning, even when the act they imitate has long since ceased to have value. The idea of someone telling me not to think a certain way, or that my ideas or not worthy of existence (an excellent way to put it, Nick) is heinous even if the act which perpetuates the symbolism can't have the effect. In other words, I know that burning a book can't halt the idea; but I also know what the burner means by doing so.GrahamKennedy wrote:That's what I mean, though. Yes it's symbolic of wanting to get rid of an idea... but the symbol has become a futile, empty one. Now when I see somebody burn a book, my though is not "they are trying to get rid of an idea", but rather "there's a person who doesn't quite grasp what century he's in."
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: Is it wrong to burn books?
I'm comfortable with that. I'm in quite a few minorities.Mikey wrote:Then you're in the minority.
I'm very aware of what the symbolism is and how nasty the thought behind it is. Yesterday I was right there in line with people who viewed that symbol that way. What I'm saying is that the meaning of symbols can change, and maybe it would be a good idea to work on changing how people view this one.Symbols bear great meaning, even when the act they imitate has long since ceased to have value. The idea of someone telling me not to think a certain way, or that my ideas or not worthy of existence (an excellent way to put it, Nick) is heinous even if the act which perpetuates the symbolism can't have the effect. In other words, I know that burning a book can't halt the idea; but I also know what the burner means by doing so.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Re: Is it wrong to burn books?
The only reason I'll ever burn a book is for keeping me warm in a worst case scenario kind of thing. Otherwise... I see no reason to.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Is it wrong to burn books?
Not just that, but once that kind of symbolism becomes popular and accepted... it can risk becoming reality.RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:Sometimes symbolism trumps the reality.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:58 am
- Location: Right here.
Re: Is it wrong to burn books?
Well haven't we all come across a book or two so awful as to be more useful as kindling than as reading material?
But this is hardly the only example of a phrase or symbol which outlives it's practical significance.
But this is hardly the only example of a phrase or symbol which outlives it's practical significance.
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wonderous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross... but it's not for the timid." Q, Q Who
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: Is it wrong to burn books?
Funnily enough I'm reading something called "Ghost" by John Ringo at the moment. It's kind of hard to describe just how weirdly perversely awful it is, but I do admit, the thought of doing nasty things to it has crossed my mind once or twice.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...