Page 4 of 4

Re: A World Without Chernobyl

Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 9:59 pm
by Monroe
I heard that Chernobyl actually created a few new species of animals like a three foot earthworm. What would we do without the three foot earthworm?!

http://www.brookings.edu/projects/archi ... ns/50.aspx

Very cool list I found just the other day when I heard about the new Russia-America arms reduction deal coming through I looked up to see what the peak was. A lot of neat facts including that we have 1 nuclear plane hangar but never have we built a nuclear plane.

Re: A World Without Chernobyl

Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:24 pm
by Mikey
At least if we build the plane, we'll have a place to keep it.

Re: A World Without Chernobyl

Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:10 pm
by Sionnach Glic
stitch626 wrote:
Sionnach Glic wrote:Personally I prefer our one, since WYSIWYG. I want to pay the price I see on the label - not that + 21%.
21%!!!!!!! :shock:
Ours is only 8.125 (here in New York at least).
Welcome to Europe.

"Tax cuts? What are they?"

:P

Re: A World Without Chernobyl

Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:13 pm
by Aaron
Well at least we have government services worth a damn.

Re: A World Without Chernobyl

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 3:15 am
by Monroe
Mikey wrote:At least if we build the plane, we'll have a place to keep it.
Maybe we'll use it to find those 10 missing warheads! :worried:

Re: A World Without Chernobyl

Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 4:56 pm
by Graham Kennedy
Monroe wrote:I heard that Chernobyl actually created a few new species of animals like a three foot earthworm. What would we do without the three foot earthworm?!
And let's not forget the 295 foot mutated Iguana.

Image

Re: A World Without Chernobyl

Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 2:37 am
by sunnyside
Hmmm. There may have been some different technologies.

The car thing might actually be possible. I don't think there is a practical shielding solution for a proper fission reaction. However there are a handful of isotopes produces by reactors that will undergo fission from interaction with....hmmm I bet it was alpha particles. So you could mix an alpha emiter with these things and (presuming they don't kick off neutrons in their reaction very often) you'd have a small scale and shieldable fission reactor.

I'd have to think the expense for such things would be out of the reach for most people, but given how much of a major pain it is for militaries to keep their tanks and such fuled we might have seen some of those.

But I dunno if it'd actually work out once you tried to implement it.