Battle of the Week : Battle of Hoth
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Battle of the Week : Battle of Hoth
Was watching the trilogy, again, last week and just came around to the issue of Hoth. While its nice that its so far out of the way. I can't help but be bothered by the amount of effort they put into building what was in truth a permanent base. To me this is a horrid mistake when you're on the run from the Empire. You should have a large number of small bases to prevent the Empire from being able to land a crippling strike against you so soon after the major victory that was the Deathstar I destruction.
Follow this up with the land battle. Why weren't their ground defenses put up with the thought of facing enemy armor? They had a massive anti-infantry defense but totally forgot that the Imps may just march on them with ATATs rather then an infantry charge.
Follow this up with the land battle. Why weren't their ground defenses put up with the thought of facing enemy armor? They had a massive anti-infantry defense but totally forgot that the Imps may just march on them with ATATs rather then an infantry charge.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Re: Battle of the Week : Battle of Hoth
Don't know much other than the movies when it comes to the OT, but I'll give a little.
Perhaps the rebels were unaware of the ATAT's true abilities and strength (or unaware of it all together).
As for the base... perhaps they thought it was far enough out of the way and deserted enough that they would not be found. Wasn't it a lucky probe droid that found them (I cannot remember if they knew the rebels were on Hoth before or after the droid found them)?
Either way though, it was a rather poor choice (as a perminant base, great as a backup temporary hiding spot).
Perhaps the rebels were unaware of the ATAT's true abilities and strength (or unaware of it all together).
As for the base... perhaps they thought it was far enough out of the way and deserted enough that they would not be found. Wasn't it a lucky probe droid that found them (I cannot remember if they knew the rebels were on Hoth before or after the droid found them)?
Either way though, it was a rather poor choice (as a perminant base, great as a backup temporary hiding spot).
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Battle of the Week : Battle of Hoth
It was a probe droid that Vader looked into and picked out as the right location.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Battle of the Week : Battle of Hoth
For me the problem with the ATATs is that some of those Generals must have seen Armour before. Its not a new invention or anything... So why didn't they put some Y-Wings in the air to aid against the ATATs?
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Battle of the Week : Battle of Hoth
I think the problem was how entrenched the guerilla mindset came to be in the heads of the Alliance. Hoth was a good hidey-hole in the sense that nobody would spend much effort looking for people there; but the resources required to set up even a long-term temporary base, much less a permanent one, in that environment must border on the ludicrous. Maybe that's why the defenses were so inadequate - there was no money left after the tunnels were dug and the heaters installed. Whatever the reason, you are correct - a handful of converted airspeeders is almost laughably moronic as defenses against the presumably well-known Imperial infantry capabilities.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Re: Battle of the Week : Battle of Hoth
What gets me is that they didn't have any heavy weapons remotely close to defending the base from ground attack. Granted the Rebels had to make due with what they got but they had a huge ion cannon ball thingy.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Battle of the Week : Battle of Hoth
You would think a couple of fighters with PTs or some man portable CM launchers would have been in order.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Battle of the Week : Battle of Hoth
Indeed. I was half-joking about running out of money, though I was serious about the exorbitant expense of making a base on a place like Hoth; but if they were able to install shielding like they did, one would expect that they could have included a couple of anti-armor launchers or something.
Wait a minute... they had at least a wing of X-wings, which are capable of atmo flight and carry proton torps. It was even said in the film that an escort of two X-wings per transport was ineffectually small, which is common-sense anyway when trying to defend the transport from an ISD. Why wasn't there an anti-AT-AT sortie of a squadron or two?
Wait a minute... they had at least a wing of X-wings, which are capable of atmo flight and carry proton torps. It was even said in the film that an escort of two X-wings per transport was ineffectually small, which is common-sense anyway when trying to defend the transport from an ISD. Why wasn't there an anti-AT-AT sortie of a squadron or two?
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 6026
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
- Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot
Re: Battle of the Week : Battle of Hoth
If I remember the film correctly it always seemed to me that for the X-Wings it was, they could escort the transport ship OR they could fight the AT-ATs. Since the leaderships priority was on the evacuation, it would make sense to focus their efforts there. Regardless of how well-defended the base is (i.e. how great their anti-armor capabilities were), it doesn't change the fact that they were found out and would've lost anyway. I'm pretty sure the infantry had very little illusions about coming outof the battle alive. Certainly they were going to try of course, but deep down they knew they weren't fighting to win.
Also, does anyone know how long things had been set up on Hoth? It could be the anti-armor weapons weren't going to arrive until "Tuesday," or something along those lines.
Also, does anyone know how long things had been set up on Hoth? It could be the anti-armor weapons weren't going to arrive until "Tuesday," or something along those lines.
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10654
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
- Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh
Re: Battle of the Week : Battle of Hoth
Even if your priority was the evac why not have the X-Wings launch two minutes early, take one pass over the AT-ATs with their PTs and then link up with the transport when it lifts off?
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Battle of the Week : Battle of Hoth
Exactly my point. Since an escort of two X-wings vs. one (or more) ISD's is tantamount to throwing a warm snowball at an M1, why not opt for the latter choice where they could actually have a positive effect?Sonic Glitch wrote:they could escort the transport ship OR they could fight the AT-ATs.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Battle of the Week : Battle of Hoth
Honestly, I would have preferred the man portable CMs in support of a single pair of fighters in Atmo. Forcing the Imps to advance on foot from as far away as they landed would have cut the losses for the Rebels. Plus would have bought them time to evac the troops that they didn't lose.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Battle of the Week : Battle of Hoth
AT-AT's had been around since the Clone Wars, so they'd have been aware of them. The most likely answer is that they either couldn't afford or couldn't obtain the necessary weapons.stitch626 wrote:Perhaps the rebels were unaware of the ATAT's true abilities and strength (or unaware of it all together).
Against an ISD, sure, but that's what the ion cannon was for. The X-wings were probably there to cover the transports against fighter interference.Mikey wrote:Exactly my point. Since an escort of two X-wings vs. one (or more) ISD's is tantamount to throwing a warm snowball at an M1, why not opt for the latter choice where they could actually have a positive effect?
We don't know whether manportable firepower exists that can stop an AT-AT. Isard's Revenge demonstrated that even X-Wing laser cannon (the same cannon that vapourised big chunks of the Death Star in ANH) will only do relatively minor damage, although they can bring AT-AT's down. Given how poorly equipped the rebels were at the time (they were extremely lucky to get their hands on X-wings), I doubt they'd be able to obtain ground-mounted weapons with that sort of firepower.Deepcrush wrote:Honestly, I would have preferred the man portable CMs in support of a single pair of fighters in Atmo.
As for using the X-wings, it's possible that they couldn't be used under the shield - note that the Imperials provided no air support to their forces whatsoever.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Battle of the Week : Battle of Hoth
When fighting an AT-AT, you don't have to stop it by destroying the whole thing. You can stop it by a shot to the cockpit or crippling one of its legs at knee joint. Taking out the cockpit being the better as it also takes out the weapons of the AT-AT.Captain Seafort wrote:We don't know whether manportable firepower exists that can stop an AT-AT. Isard's Revenge demonstrated that even X-Wing laser cannon (the same cannon that vapourised big chunks of the Death Star in ANH) will only do relatively minor damage, although they can bring AT-AT's down. Given how poorly equipped the rebels were at the time (they were extremely lucky to get their hands on X-wings), I doubt they'd be able to obtain ground-mounted weapons with that sort of firepower.
As to how they were equipped, if they could get their hands on an Ion Cannon the scale of the one on Hoth. Then there's no reason to believe they couldn't get their hands on some portable CM launchers.
True enough, so why not fit the speeders with a warhead? The CIS used a CM for taking out AT-TEs and it was easily small enough to be fitted to a snowspeeder.Captain Seafort wrote:As for using the X-wings, it's possible that they couldn't be used under the shield - note that the Imperials provided no air support to their forces whatsoever.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Battle of the Week : Battle of Hoth
Again, I'm forced to say, "Two whole snubs against an ISD's worth of fighters?" Even the rebels thought it was a ridiculously - and uselessly - small escort complement. If you know that your X-wings are going to do sweet F. A. as escorts, I'll repeat - why not then use them where they'll do something useful?Captain Seafort wrote:Against an ISD, sure, but that's what the ion cannon was for. The X-wings were probably there to cover the transports against fighter interference.
In fact, we can guardedly assume from Hoth that man-pack firepower that can stop an AT-AT doesn't exist. Man-pack firepower is just about all the Alliance could have hoped for, and what we could reasonably expect to see - if we didn't see it, it either didn't exist or the Alliance decided not to use it. I fervently hope and pray that the latter isn't the case.Captain Seafort wrote:We don't know whether manportable firepower exists that can stop an AT-AT.
It's possible, but then again airspeeders were used with no qualms. Those speeders weren't strictly repulsor-powered, so any restriction imposed by the shield against the snubfighters should apply to the airspeeders as well.Captain Seafort wrote:As for using the X-wings, it's possible that they couldn't be used under the shield
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer