Reliant121 wrote:Sadly, a lot of my generation have never heard of either.
Which is part of the issue here.
Reliant121 wrote:Sadly, a lot of my generation have never heard of either.

Deepcrush wrote:Maybe, but in a Galactic wide conflict when there were thousands of Jedi, thousands of other generals and admirals, and with the Emperor taking the credit for the victory and largely blanking out the Jedi. Its rather easy to consider that Luke never came across Kenobi.
Deepcrush wrote:Wrong, Independent Affiliate doesn't indicate anything other then they were apart from the Empire, didn't challenge the Empire, and the Empire left them alone. If it were a client state, it would have said client state.

Mikey wrote:This one, not so much. "Affiliate" means "affiliated," not "passingly familiar."

Captain Seafort wrote:Again the question is why would he. Some EU stuff says Luke like playing on the internet. I doubt that makes him an expert on Galactic history.
Me neither. However, there's a difference between being an expert on galactic history and recognising the name of of one of the most famous commanders of the Clone Wars. It's the equivalent of never having heard of Rommel or Montgomery.

Deepcrush wrote:You mean other then blowing up two Death Stars, score after score of planetary raids, built a fleet right under the nose of the Empire... Sounds pretty damn successful.
Oh, like the end of the Rebellion? What if there were hundreds or thousands of systems in revolt? You know, like at the end of the Empire when it fell to the Rebellion? The end of RotJ, where systems across the Empire have risen up. Like that kind of evidence... the Film itself right?
Maybe, but in a Galactic wide conflict when there were thousands of Jedi, thousands of other generals and admirals, and with the Emperor taking the credit for the victory and largely blanking out the Jedi. Its rather easy to consider that Luke never came across Kenobi.
No, being able to land troops on foreign lands doesn't mean you control those lands. The US lands troops all the time in other countries, the British Empire did so before as well. Neither controlled every place they landed.
Wrong, Independent Affiliate doesn't indicate anything other then they were apart from the Empire, didn't challenge the Empire, and the Empire left them alone. If it were a client state, it would have said client state.
Again, you're claiming they paid taxes, that the Hutts weren't separate of the Empire, evidence?
Yes, Lando informs Han and Leia that Bespin isn't apart of the Empire. That they run a free operation in a free system. Leia instantly asks if he's a part of the Merchants' Guild.

Sonic Glitch wrote:Speaking as a member of the age-group that Luke would be in ANH (19/20 right?), that's not exactly hard. I know plenty of people who would not recognize those names if they came up in casual conversation, or a news article somewhere.


Reliant121 wrote:To be fair, there was some 19 years between the formation of the Empire and the Battle of Yavin. I certainly don't know of any major generals or figureheads of the Gulf War for example, and most of the people my age don't even know that it happened.

Captain Seafort wrote:Read what I wrote - I'm talking about the pre-Endor Empire, when the Rebellion was no more than a minor nuisance. Post-Endor the whole thing fragmented.
Captain Seafort wrote:True, there were thousands of senior commanders, and some of them were certainly glossed over, but Kenobi and Skywalker were far more than just another pair of Generals. They were legends in their own lifetime, household names across the Republic. Sweeping those two under the rug would have been impossible within the couple of decades between the Clone Wars and the OT.
Captain Seafort wrote:No. However, the key bit is the fact that there was no resistance whatsoever, and the stormies presence was treated by the locals as that of a police force, not as invaders.
Captain Seafort wrote:Bullshit. As Mikey pointed out, the use of the term "affiliate" means they were affiliated to the Empire, not completely independent of it.
Captain Seafort wrote:The Essential Atlas.
Captain Seafort wrote:Mining Guild. Fair enough regarding the point of the independence of those operations, although that reads more like a case of the Empire lacking the legal right to nationalise Mining Guild instillations rather than the MG controlling any meaningful territory. Lando's exact comment was that "since we're a small operation we don't fall under the jurisdiction of the Empire". This suggests that above a certain size, such instillations do fall under Imperial jurisdiction.

Deepcrush wrote:So we should ignore their successes
Household names? Legends in their own life times? Weren't they largely able to move about undetected in their own life times... Seems thats not to household of a person if they can walk through their own capital world and people don't know them. I would love to see some evidence that says they were what you claim.
Considering the outcome on that world, saying their was no resistance is kind of silly.
Since by all views that I've seen that planet was owned by the Hutts
I'm affiliated with the University of Maryland... yet I'm rather independent of them so long as I'm not pissing on their lawn. Much the same with the Hapes and the Empire.
Naming the title of a book that uses Wookiee as part of its source guild is first off useless as it doesn't prove anything to your point and second off is about as trustworthy as you are considering the number of mistakes in the book.
So how about posting some real evidence such as a canon statement of tax collection by the Empire from the Hutts.
So then they are independent of the Empire as I stated. Shortly after the statement by Lando about not being a part of the Empire, Han asks him if the Empire will ever find out about them. Meaning that the Empire likely didn't know about the place until they followed Han and Leia there.


stitch626 wrote:Just looked in the local phone book, and there are 5 Montgomerys. No Rommels though.
Also 1 Hussein.
BTW, in this context, who the heck are Montgomery and Rommel?

Bernard Montgomery, because he might just have lost the war for the Allies if we'd been listened to him.

Tyyr wrote:Bernard Montgomery, because he might just have lost the war for the Allies if we'd been listened to him.

Captain Seafort wrote:I'm saying we should treat their successes for what they were - minor insect bites.
Captain Seafort wrote:The RotS novelization.
Captain Seafort wrote:The outcome was that the planet was under the firm control of the Empire. One smuggler taking a few potshots at a stormie and managing to dodge the blockade does not constitute resistance.
Captain Seafort wrote:As of TPM, sure. ANH demonstrates that by that time the situation had changed.
Captain Seafort wrote:You're not a political entity controlling territory.
Captain Seafort wrote:You (entirely reasonably) wanted my source, I gave you it.
Captain Seafort wrote:I don't have the exact quote, merely that the fact is mentioned in the EA.
Captain Seafort wrote:It's not part of the Empire in the same way some gold panner in the Sierra Nevadas isn't "part of" the US.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest