Were the Jedi justified in removing Palpatine?
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10654
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
- Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh
Re: Were the Jedi justified in removing Palpatine?
Lot of parallels between the pointy eared jackasses with a superiority complex and the Jedi. Lot of differences to, most Jedi had round ears.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Were the Jedi justified in removing Palpatine?
Truth is that the Jedi began to see themselves as above everyone else. When you do that, you loose touch with those you are supposed to be serving.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Re: Were the Jedi justified in removing Palpatine?
And start to think that your infallable.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Were the Jedi justified in removing Palpatine?
Pretty much. Its the truth of all empires. Sooner or later, they mess up and fall.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10654
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
- Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh
Re: Were the Jedi justified in removing Palpatine?
I noticed something interesting in Ep III. The Jedi were resentful that Palpatine wanted to keep tabs on what they were doing, so much so that they didn't promote Anakin to Master even though he was on the council and then demanded he spy on the Chancellor because of it. Imagine the hubris of Palpatine. The Republic creates an army, gives it to the Jedi to lead, lets them prosecute the war on the Republic's behalf. I mean HOW DARE he want to keep abreast of what the Jedi were up to. Every time I watch the prequels I become more and more convinced the Jedi did it to themselves. They got full of themselves, saw everyone else as serving by their leave, and eventually fell.
Re: Were the Jedi justified in removing Palpatine?
Yes, I would say that the Jedi were highly in the wrong.
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15368
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Re: Were the Jedi justified in removing Palpatine?
Yeah the Jedi didnt want Palpatine spying on them, the guy who had stayed in power to long, had changed rules to give himself more power, had ignored democracy at every step...
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10654
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
- Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh
Re: Were the Jedi justified in removing Palpatine?
And was the legal head of state of the Republic who would have been incredibly negligent in his duties to not stay up to date on what the generals defending his Republic were up to.
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15368
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Re: Were the Jedi justified in removing Palpatine?
Sadam was the legal head of Iraq. You want him listening in on your conversations?
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Re: Were the Jedi justified in removing Palpatine?
Fair point.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10654
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
- Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh
Re: Were the Jedi justified in removing Palpatine?
If you're an Iraqi general you should probably expect it.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12998
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact:
Re: Were the Jedi justified in removing Palpatine?
That's one of the problems with the prequel Jedi. They're just too flawed an organization. Locked in their literal ivory tower, isolated and arrogant.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Were the Jedi justified in removing Palpatine?
No where near the same. Palp was elected under the laws of the Republic.Teaos wrote:Sadam was the legal head of Iraq. You want him listening in on your conversations?
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
- SuperSaiyaMan12
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 760
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:41 pm
- Location: Auburn
- Contact:
Re: Were the Jedi justified in removing Palpatine?
Hussien was the legal elected president of Iraq. Hitler was the legal elected Chancellor of Germany. Both were in office longer than their terms would allow and ignored democracy at every turn. Like Palpatine.Deepcrush wrote:No where near the same. Palp was elected under the laws of the Republic.Teaos wrote:Sadam was the legal head of Iraq. You want him listening in on your conversations?
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Were the Jedi justified in removing Palpatine?
No he wasn't - he came to power through a coup.SuperSaiyaMan12 wrote:Hussien was the legal elected president of Iraq.
He wasn't elected - he was appointed Chancellor by Hindenburg, and then unilaterally assumed the Presidency.Hitler was the legal elected Chancellor of Germany.
Not at all - Palpatine became Chancellor of the Republic, and then extended his term, by perfectly legal means. Even the Declaration of the New Order was approved by the Senate. That was his genius - the Francis Urquhart of the galaxy.Both were in office longer than their terms would allow and ignored democracy at every turn. Like Palpatine.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.