How would you disprove the 3 million number?

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:58 am

If I was forced to use the 3 million number I'd just clarify it as being one army out of thousands.

Post by **Captain Seafort** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:09 pm

Or state that that was the strength of the special forces.

Deepcrush · Post by **Deepcrush** » Sat Jul 04, 2009 8:41 am

3 million ARC troopers would be a nasty force to handle...

stitch626 · Post by **stitch626** » Sat Jul 04, 2009 5:07 pm

That would be a great way of dealing with it. Just "modify" what she meant to mean the spec forces.

Deepcrush · Post by **Deepcrush** » Sat Jul 04, 2009 7:38 pm

Well, if anyone was able to kill a hundred to one... then surely it must have meant the ARC troopers who make the Commandos look soft...

Monroe · Post by **Monroe** » Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:10 am

Captain Seafort wrote:Or state that that was the strength of the special forces.

I like that idea. Still though is 3 million arc troopers too small? lol. Maybe that's a question for the army size thread. I'd probably be an asshole and say there are over five million arc troopers haha

Post by **Captain Seafort** » Mon Jul 06, 2009 6:25 pm

Monroe wrote:I like that idea. Still though is 3 million arc troopers too small? lol. Maybe that's a question for the army size thread. I'd probably be an asshole and say there are over five million arc troopers haha

It is. 22 SAS is about 250 men strong, out of an army of less than 100,000. Assuming the ratio were the same, the entire GAR would be only a billion strong. Then only way to rationalise even that would be to assume that the Republic effectively ignores special forces ops.

How would you disprove the 3 million number?

Re: How would you disprove the 3 million number?

Re: How would you disprove the 3 million number?

Re: How would you disprove the 3 million number?

Re: How would you disprove the 3 million number?

Re: How would you disprove the 3 million number?

Re: How would you disprove the 3 million number?

Re: How would you disprove the 3 million number?