USS Vengeance specifications

Discussion of the new run of Star Trek XI+ movies and any spinoffs
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: USS Vengeance specifications

Post by Mikey »

Teaos wrote:And the E-Neo is now totally obsolete.
Yeah, 'cause in the main timeline we never once saw the E-A again after the Exclesior class was launched, right?
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Jim
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1907
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:32 pm
Location: Pittsburgh
Contact:

Re: USS Vengeance specifications

Post by Jim »

In the DS9 days the Miranda was potentially comparable to a PT boat (vs a battleship) in WW2, yet tons of them were used against the Dominion.
Ugh... do not thump the Book of G'Quan...
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6242
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: USS Vengeance specifications

Post by McAvoy »

Real-world navies hang onto their previous ships that are outclassed by the new ships all the time.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15368
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: USS Vengeance specifications

Post by Teaos »

Mikey wrote:
Teaos wrote:And the E-Neo is now totally obsolete.
Yeah, 'cause in the main timeline we never once saw the E-A again after the Exclesior class was launched, right?
The Excelsior is somewhat stronger than the E-A, but after the refit it still held its own.

The Vengence is almost an orde of magnitude abouve the E-Neo.

You can no longer ask the Ent tp deal with a situation because its the strongest, or fastest, or closest.

The Vengance can get almost anywhere in the Federation in minutes.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: USS Vengeance specifications

Post by Mikey »

OK, then - in WWII, the Iowa-class was the roughest naval SoB that the U.S. made. Yet, we still made PT boats and D-E's too. Same principle applies here.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6242
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: USS Vengeance specifications

Post by McAvoy »

Not to mention the WW1 Era slow battleships, heavy cruisers and the treaty battleships.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
dagadget
Senior chief petty officer
Senior chief petty officer
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Avon Park, Florida

Re: USS Vengeance specifications

Post by dagadget »

So did anyone ever get around to posting the specs on the Dreadnaught Class or Vengeance Class ships?
Meste17
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 577
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 2:45 pm

Re: USS Vengeance specifications

Post by Meste17 »

Jim wrote:0.74, on a scale of 1000? Yowza!
Ikr?!
Meste17
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 577
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 2:45 pm

Re: USS Vengeance specifications

Post by Meste17 »

Jim wrote:0.74, on a scale of 1000? Yowza!
I know right? -_- No wonder the Enterprise got its ass kicked almost instantly in EVERY SINGLE JJ Trek movie! -_-
Meste17
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 577
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 2:45 pm

Re: USS Vengeance specifications

Post by Meste17 »

LaughingCheese wrote: Sun Aug 03, 2014 4:32 am Um, shouldn't the Vengeance be a class of its own? Not sure how you got "Constitution."

Neo-E is Constitution Class.


The Vengeance is something entirely new and different. At least that was my impression, I mean they certainly look nothing alike.

Yes, because as i have stated in the first post, those specs WERE of the Enterprise, or Neo-E.
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6242
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: USS Vengeance specifications

Post by McAvoy »

Meste17 wrote: Thu Dec 28, 2023 1:39 am
LaughingCheese wrote: Sun Aug 03, 2014 4:32 am Um, shouldn't the Vengeance be a class of its own? Not sure how you got "Constitution."

Neo-E is Constitution Class.


The Vengeance is something entirely new and different. At least that was my impression, I mean they certainly look nothing alike.

Yes, because as i have stated in the first post, those specs WERE of the Enterprise, or Neo-E.
Almost six years dude. C'mon man.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
Meste17
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 577
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 2:45 pm

Re: USS Vengeance specifications

Post by Meste17 »

Forgive me bro. I'm not able to use internet quite as often as you guys. I mean come on, I'm lucky to get online on Fridays anymore. -_-
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6242
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: USS Vengeance specifications

Post by McAvoy »

Meste17 wrote: Sat Mar 30, 2024 1:38 pm Forgive me bro. I'm not able to use internet quite as often as you guys. I mean come on, I'm lucky to get online on Fridays anymore. -_-
3 months. Sometimes you can just leave it be.

Don't have a phone? I use my phone all the time to respond to post on this forum. Doing it right now.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
Meste17
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 577
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 2:45 pm

Re: USS Vengeance specifications

Post by Meste17 »

McAvoy wrote: Mon Apr 01, 2024 11:01 pm
Meste17 wrote: Sat Mar 30, 2024 1:38 pm Forgive me bro. I'm not able to use internet quite as often as you guys. I mean come on, I'm lucky to get online on Fridays anymore. -_-
3 months. Sometimes you can just leave it be.

Don't have a phone? I use my phone all the time to respond to post on this forum. Doing it right now.
I used to, but it went kaput on me -_-
Post Reply