Budget cutback for Trek XIII?

Discussion of the new run of Star Trek XI+ movies and any spinoffs
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Budget cutback for Trek XIII?

Post by Graham Kennedy »

Hollywood Reporter has an interesting article regarding lessons learned from the Summer 2013 Box Office smackdown.

The undying spectre of a PACIFIC RIM sequel is once more evoked (the film is being scripted as I understand it - but the existence of script does not a movie guarantee), and the article also pings STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS…and what its performance might mean for another jaunt to the Final Frontier.

Seems there are budget concerns about the upcoming third installment, which’ll once again be scripted by Orci and Kurtzman. Such concerns may help to illuminate the recent rumors of ATTACK THE BLOCK’s Joe Corninsh directing the project - given that he realized so much with so few resources during the making of that picture.
Paramount also will look to save money on another Star Trek -- a franchise, but not quite in the top tier. This summer's $190 million production Star Trek Into Darkness has earned over $462 million worldwide; its international haul has exceeded expectations at $234 million, but domestically, its $228.5 million hasn't matched the first film. Whereas the first two were shot in L.A., the next will be filmed in a more tax-friendly location. "We're making it for what it should have been shot for last time if we had made it outside of L.A., which we would have done except that [director J.J. Abrams] didn't want to," says a studio source. "That was a $20 million issue.”
Source

Interesting... could lead to a slightly more script/idea focused film, which is something a lot of fans have been saying they want.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15368
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Budget cutback for Trek XIII?

Post by Teaos »

Meh, I saw this coming, Hollywood budgets have been getting stupidly high. They can make a fine movie for 100 mill.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Budget cutback for Trek XIII?

Post by Tsukiyumi »

I'm with Teaos on that. A lot of directors have proven that they can make great movies without an extra $50 million of CGI. Plus, shooting in LA? Who does that anymore? Especially if it saves $20 mil. Come to Austin instead.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
User avatar
Nutso
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9631
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 9:58 pm

Re: Budget cutback for Trek XIII?

Post by Nutso »

Well now that J.J. Abrams has moved on, maybe they could move some of that lens flare money into writers.
"Bible, Wrath of Khan, what's the difference?"
Stan - South Park
Tyyr
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10654
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh

Re: Budget cutback for Trek XIII?

Post by Tyyr »

Doesn't bother me. What'll get cut are flashy special effects forcing them to produce a script more focused on characters and drama than starships crashing.
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15368
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Budget cutback for Trek XIII?

Post by Teaos »

Or just not make it more likely.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Tyyr
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10654
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh

Re: Budget cutback for Trek XIII?

Post by Tyyr »

It more than doubled it's money. They're going to make another one.
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6242
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: Budget cutback for Trek XIII?

Post by McAvoy »

I think they can save alittle money on cutting out dumb flashy scenes that do not move the story along.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
Atekimogus
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 1193
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:10 pm
Location: Vienna

Re: Budget cutback for Trek XIII?

Post by Atekimogus »

Great news, maybe they'll finally realize that a good story and well thought out dialoge is still cheaper than having explosions every second frame.

Quite honestly...I always wonder how they manage to blow so much money on those movies in the first place. I could kinda understand if they'd still blow up models etc. but since most of the tricks are done on a computer....

Now I know, it looked good and they had quite a few impressive scenes......but imho they were all wasted, there wasn't really much memorable in the movie, special effects wise imho. The submerged Enterprise was "kinda" cool but other than that.........all the huge explosions and crashes....I don't know. Nowadays you are so used to them, I find it hard to be impressed, no matter how detailed a space-ship crashing into a city is rendered.
I'm Commander Shepard and this is my favorite store on the Citadel.
RK_Striker_JK_5
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 12997
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: New Hampshire
Contact:

Re: Budget cutback for Trek XIII?

Post by RK_Striker_JK_5 »

Count me as another one who sees this as a good thing.
User avatar
IanKennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Oxford, UK
Contact:

Re: Budget cutback for Trek XIII?

Post by IanKennedy »

They could half the budget by simply not rendering the CGI lens flare. Improved film and a budget saving to boot. :)
email, ergo spam
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6242
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: Budget cutback for Trek XIII?

Post by McAvoy »

Being innovative too would work. Instead of spending a shit ton of money on basically what could be a throwaway shot, some guy comes up with a SFX for it for $19.21 in supplies instead of a $150,000 shot using CGI.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
Atekimogus
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 1193
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:10 pm
Location: Vienna

Re: Budget cutback for Trek XIII?

Post by Atekimogus »

Nutso wrote:Well now that J.J. Abrams has moved on, maybe they could move some of that lens flare money into writers.
Hmm.....come to think of it......what else really is there they could still rip off which has an appeal to an wider audience? Beam me up Scotty, Damn it Jim I am a doctor, the death of a redshirt, Khan the villain, KKKHHHAAAANNN the scream......

I mean what else really is there which even non-fans might know about and which became pop-culture? What else can they rip off before they start ripping themselves off again?

Sooner or later they have to come up with something new.....hopefully.
I'm Commander Shepard and this is my favorite store on the Citadel.
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Budget cutback for Trek XIII?

Post by Graham Kennedy »

In the next films they will have to go back in time to save the whales from extinction...
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15368
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Budget cutback for Trek XIII?

Post by Teaos »

Technically yeah, if this is a reboot, that is going to happen.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Post Reply