Enterprise CVN-80

In the real world
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Enterprise CVN-80

Post by Tsukiyumi »

Captain Seafort wrote:At least you haven't got a USS George W Bush to serve on. Yet.
Shut up! Someone might read this!
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Enterprise CVN-80

Post by Captain Seafort »

:twisted:
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Enterprise CVN-80

Post by Tsukiyumi »

:lol:
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15368
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Enterprise CVN-80

Post by Teaos »

RNZN Helen Clark... No thanks
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: Enterprise CVN-80

Post by Aaron »

HMCS Stephan Harper?

Damn thing will sink, cause of the massive hole where the brain should be.
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6225
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: Enterprise CVN-80

Post by McAvoy »

Tsukiyumi wrote:
Captain Seafort wrote:At least you haven't got a USS George W Bush to serve on. Yet.
Shut up! Someone might read this!
Yes the Big Grey Bush. I was on it when it was still so shiny new that nothing worked. Food sucked more than usual.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
User avatar
Reliant121
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 12263
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm

Re: Enterprise CVN-80

Post by Reliant121 »

What you do in your spare time is up to you, mate :P
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6225
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: Enterprise CVN-80

Post by McAvoy »

Well I love those cucumbers tickling the back of my throat.

Wait what?
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Enterprise CVN-80

Post by Deepcrush »

GrahamKennedy wrote:
Captain Seafort wrote:
Deepcrush wrote:With the Ark Royal, if I were the RN, I'd wait until a ship worthy of the history came along. Putting the name to a jeep carrier or a destroyer would be just plain insulting to a legacy of that scale.
That's why I'm miffed about the QEs - they're proper fleet carriers. Not up to the scale of a Nimitz, but the largest warships we've ever built, and far more impressive than the Invincible-class escort carriers (which included the fifth Ark Royal).
There's been some talk of doing just that.
This would be good. The name should always be carried on the best the RN can provide.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Post Reply