Enterprise CVN-80

In the real world
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6243
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: Enterprise CVN-80

Post by McAvoy »

Good point. Carrier naming is very political in the US and I assume it would be similar to the British political system.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Enterprise CVN-80

Post by Captain Seafort »

McAvoy wrote:Carrier naming is very political in the US and I assume it would be similar to the British political system.
Not as much actually - Parliament doesn't hold nearly as much sway over the details of foreign policy as Congress does. They're there to debate legislation and rubber-stamp the budget, not to micro-manage government policy. The closest we've come to "political" influence over a ship's name was a (successful) grass-roots letter writing campaign when the old Ark was due to be scrapped to keep the name alive, which had nothing to do with Parliament.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Enterprise CVN-80

Post by Deepcrush »

With the Ark Royal, if I were the RN, I'd wait until a ship worthy of the history came along. Putting the name to a jeep carrier or a destroyer would be just plain insulting to a legacy of that scale.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Enterprise CVN-80

Post by Captain Seafort »

Deepcrush wrote:With the Ark Royal, if I were the RN, I'd wait until a ship worthy of the history came along. Putting the name to a jeep carrier or a destroyer would be just plain insulting to a legacy of that scale.
That's why I'm miffed about the QEs - they're proper fleet carriers. Not up to the scale of a Nimitz, but the largest warships we've ever built, and far more impressive than the Invincible-class escort carriers (which included the fifth Ark Royal).
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Enterprise CVN-80

Post by Deepcrush »

While I'm not bothered as to the RN building a fleet of ships to match a Nimitz. I am very strongly of the opinion if England wants to reclaim a spot as a world power, then their should be at least one ship in the fleet to match that of the USN. That being as much to show that the RN can do so as much as actively doing so.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6243
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: Enterprise CVN-80

Post by McAvoy »

So you have not named ships after living politicians? Just wondering. I understand about naming the two carriers after living monarchy families as that is tradition.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15368
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Enterprise CVN-80

Post by Teaos »

Not sure if thats a rule or just whats happened so far.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Enterprise CVN-80

Post by Graham Kennedy »

Captain Seafort wrote:
Deepcrush wrote:With the Ark Royal, if I were the RN, I'd wait until a ship worthy of the history came along. Putting the name to a jeep carrier or a destroyer would be just plain insulting to a legacy of that scale.
That's why I'm miffed about the QEs - they're proper fleet carriers. Not up to the scale of a Nimitz, but the largest warships we've ever built, and far more impressive than the Invincible-class escort carriers (which included the fifth Ark Royal).
There's been some talk of doing just that.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15368
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Enterprise CVN-80

Post by Teaos »

I cant see Charles giving a shit, he's always hated the lime light.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Enterprise CVN-80

Post by Captain Seafort »

Aye. The ship isn't even named for him personally.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6243
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: Enterprise CVN-80

Post by McAvoy »

That's if you guys even get those ships. I keep hearing one will go into mothballs and the other sold or rented. Or one or both will be scrapped.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Enterprise CVN-80

Post by Captain Seafort »

McAvoy wrote:That's if you guys even get those ships. I keep hearing one will go into mothballs and the other sold or rented. Or one or both will be scrapped.
The official line on what those ships are going to be, what they'll fly, and what's going to happen with them changes every few months.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
Reliant121
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 12263
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm

Re: Enterprise CVN-80

Post by Reliant121 »

McAvoy wrote:So you have not named ships after living politicians? Just wondering. I understand about naming the two carriers after living monarchy families as that is tradition.
Nope. Most of our larger surface combatants are named after places at the moment (cities such as HMS Edinburgh or counties such as HMS Kent). Our submarines and now the latest line of DDG's all have a name or quality that begins with the same letter as the class name. The Daring class ships so far are Daring, Dauntless, Diamond and Dragon; submarines have been named this way for quite some time. The carriers are usually named for Monarchs are named after past carriers. Other ships have quality based names like Endurance. I think politicians are greeted with such apathy by our general population naming warships after them would garner a public outcry.
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Enterprise CVN-80

Post by Tsukiyumi »

Reliant121 wrote: I think politicians are greeted with such apathy by our general population naming warships after them would garner a public outcry.
Heh. I imagine no one for a generation at least over here would want to serve on the USS George W Bush. :lol:


Wait... :(
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Enterprise CVN-80

Post by Captain Seafort »

At least you haven't got a USS George W Bush to serve on. Yet.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Post Reply