Spitfires to fly again?
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Spitfires to fly again?
We all know that the Spitfire is one of the iconic aircraft of all time. Happily, I have seen one flying on several occasions, have some lovely pictures of them. But that its a rare thing indeed, because naturally after all this time there are very few flying Spitfires left in the world - from memory I believe there are five.
Well, here's the thing. In 1945 some Spitfire IIs were sent out to Burma. Near the end of World War II these planes were waxed, wrapped up in grease paper, and sealed with tar. Then they were buried. The location was lost to time, and nobody had any real idea where they are.
Until an enterprising individual named David Cundell decided to find them - and now, find them he has. They were almost brand new when they were buried and are almost perfectly preserved, by all accounts - they'll need some restoration work, but it should be relatively straightforward to get them back into flying condition.
All TWENTY of them.
David Cameron is supporting the effort, which intends to essentially create an entire squadron of flying Spitfires!
Source
This is absolutely AWESOME.
(Oh, turns out that it's 35 flying now, not five. But this is still awesome!)
Well, here's the thing. In 1945 some Spitfire IIs were sent out to Burma. Near the end of World War II these planes were waxed, wrapped up in grease paper, and sealed with tar. Then they were buried. The location was lost to time, and nobody had any real idea where they are.
Until an enterprising individual named David Cundell decided to find them - and now, find them he has. They were almost brand new when they were buried and are almost perfectly preserved, by all accounts - they'll need some restoration work, but it should be relatively straightforward to get them back into flying condition.
All TWENTY of them.
David Cameron is supporting the effort, which intends to essentially create an entire squadron of flying Spitfires!
Source
This is absolutely AWESOME.
(Oh, turns out that it's 35 flying now, not five. But this is still awesome!)
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Re: Spitfires to fly again?
Damn nice!
Definitely not making new ones from 1940's anymore. So finding 20 brand new ones is a huge victory for fans of Spitfires and WW2 aircraft.
Definitely not making new ones from 1940's anymore. So finding 20 brand new ones is a huge victory for fans of Spitfires and WW2 aircraft.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 21747
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
- Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
- Contact:
Re: Spitfires to fly again?
I'd love to fly one someday. I guess this just increased the chances of that happening by a small margin at least.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Spitfires to fly again?
Why are they so rare? Did Supermarine build extraordinarily small numbers? In the 'States, guys who maintain and fly P-51's, P-47's, etc. at fairs and such are relatively common.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Re: Spitfires to fly again?
I know that when a B-17 went down last year it was one of a handful left and the destruction of one was and still is a big hit to the aviation community.
I'd imagine between the wear and tear on many planes in combination of a lack of foresight, plus they were needed as scrap metal is the reason why there are so few.
I also have to question some planes are original or not. I know that nearly all WW1 era planes in existence today are reproductions.
On aside note, if I was a billionaire I would so want to own one. It will be my personal plane (fuck Lear jets) and it will go nicely with my USS New Jersey Battleship Yacht.
I'd imagine between the wear and tear on many planes in combination of a lack of foresight, plus they were needed as scrap metal is the reason why there are so few.
I also have to question some planes are original or not. I know that nearly all WW1 era planes in existence today are reproductions.
On aside note, if I was a billionaire I would so want to own one. It will be my personal plane (fuck Lear jets) and it will go nicely with my USS New Jersey Battleship Yacht.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Spitfires to fly again?
I wasn't aware the the New Jersey was up for sale.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Re: Spitfires to fly again?
With enough money it would be.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 6026
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
- Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot
Re: Spitfires to fly again?
Rule of Acquisition number 98: Every man has his price.
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Spitfires to fly again?
On the contrary - more Spits were produced than any other western allied aircraft. We simply don't have the same warbird culture you do.Mikey wrote:Why are they so rare? Did Supermarine build extraordinarily small numbers? In the 'States, guys who maintain and fly P-51's, P-47's, etc. at fairs and such are relatively common.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Re: Spitfires to fly again?
Or preserving ships like the US. We like to like collect warship museums.
The British should have kept the Warspite but then again we should have kept the Enterprise too.
The British should have kept the Warspite but then again we should have kept the Enterprise too.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Spitfires to fly again?
HMS Warspite certainly had a record worthy of preserving her, but her end was ironic in a way that no museum could have been - both tugs slipped their tows when she was being taken to be scrapped; she dropped anchor in heavy seas, having suddenly been set adrift, but the anchor slipped; she ran aground, righted herself, then ran aground again, too badly damaging her hull to be re-floated. Enterprise would likewise have been nice, but how many decommissioned carrier-turned-museums can we have?McAvoy wrote:Or preserving ships like the US. We like to like collect warship museums.
The British should have kept the Warspite but then again we should have kept the Enterprise too.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Spitfires to fly again?
I'm not sure irony's the right word. "Appropriate", maybe, given the reason why she slipped that line - her rudder went hard over, for no apparent reason whatsoever, just as she'd be doing the same, on and off, for thirty years, ever since the hit she took at Windy Corner.Mikey wrote:[HMS Warspite certainly had a record worthy of preserving her, but her end was ironic in a way that no museum could have been - both tugs slipped their tows when she was being taken to be scrapped
I've never understood the US obsession with random warships. You must have dozens of them, but the only two with the history to deserve it are Old Ironsides and Missouri. It would be worthwhile scrapping every other carrier you had, if it meant keeping Enterprise.Enterprise would likewise have been nice, but how many decommissioned carrier-turned-museums can we have?
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Spitfires to fly again?
I didn't know that. I knew one hawser simply broke and she slipped the other, but I didn't know why.Captain Seafort wrote:her rudder went hard over, for no apparent reason whatsoever, just as she'd be doing the same, on and off, for thirty years, ever since the hit she took at Windy Corner.
While the Enterprise CV-6 was the most decorated ship in the USN ever, the "Fighting I" wasn't without honors, notably Leyte Gulf and Vietnam. Further, she isn't remembered just for her wartime role, but for being a Mercury and Gemini recovery ship as well. The Intrepid museum isn't a museum dedicated to USN carriers; it's "The Intrepid Sea-Air-Space Museum." As to battleships, I'm not sure; certainly there's state pride at work in the usage of the USS New Jersey as a museum first in Bayonne, NJ and now in Camden, NJ; and the Mighty Mo's history speaks for itself as to being a museum piece at Pearl Harbor.Captain Seafort wrote:I've never understood the US obsession with random warships. You must have dozens of them, but the only two with the history to deserve it are Old Ironsides and Missouri. It would be worthwhile scrapping every other carrier you had, if it meant keeping Enterprise.
I have to say, though, if I were a Brit and had to choose one philosophy over the other - I'd rather have dozens of less-significant ships hanging around than to have scrapped Warspite.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Spitfires to fly again?
Fair enough, three that deserve it - that's still a sight fewer than the dozens you've got.Mikey wrote:*snip Intrepid's record*
I'm sure there is, but simply sharing a name doesn't mean the ship's important enough to hang onto.As to battleships, I'm not sure; certainly there's state pride at work in the usage of the USS New Jersey as a museum first in Bayonne, NJ and now in Camden, NJ;
The problem it's that both philosophies have failed - we're very picky about what we keep, and lost our greatest warship of the 20th century, you hang onto almost everything and lost your greatest warship of the 20th century. Given that, I'd rather fall back on the ship's equivalent of a decent human burial - scrap.I have to say, though, if I were a Brit and had to choose one philosophy over the other - I'd rather have dozens of less-significant ships hanging around than to have scrapped Warspite.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Re: Spitfires to fly again?
So... keeping ships as tourist attraction is a bad thing? Something that could be used to possibly bolster the local economy?
Besides the ships are kept for othe reasons. Nowadays it costs money to scrap ships as opposed to selling them for scrap. The US Navy has nothing to do with these ships once they became museum ships with the exception of the Iowa class battleships. However limitations placed on the museum ships were lifted about ten years ago. The cost to maintain these museum ships are from ticket sales, merchandise and donations.
50,000 tons of steel is useful but it isn't like we are hurting from a lack of steel right now.
Besides the ships are kept for othe reasons. Nowadays it costs money to scrap ships as opposed to selling them for scrap. The US Navy has nothing to do with these ships once they became museum ships with the exception of the Iowa class battleships. However limitations placed on the museum ships were lifted about ten years ago. The cost to maintain these museum ships are from ticket sales, merchandise and donations.
50,000 tons of steel is useful but it isn't like we are hurting from a lack of steel right now.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"