stitch626 wrote:RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:Let's have a contest between this and the guy who wanted to build the Enterprise.
Wouldn't that breach the no verses rule?
They're not fighting, simply having a construction race.
www.ditl.org
Daystrom Institute Technical Library
Death Star Petition
20 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Death Star Petition
by RK_Striker_JK_5 » Mon Dec 17, 2012 4:29 am
They're not fighting, simply having a construction race.
-
RK_Striker_JK_5 - 2 Star Admiral
- Posts: 8016
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 4:27 am
- Location: New Hampshire
Re: Death Star Petition
by IanKennedy » Wed Dec 19, 2012 4:37 pm
Varthikes wrote:United States to build the Death Star.
It probably won't happen, but I would certainly love to be a fly on the wall when this petition is reviewed.
I think the official White House response should: "Feck off you sad bastards".
email, ergo spam
-
IanKennedy - Site Admin
- Posts: 3927
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 1:28 pm
- Location: Oxford, UK
Re: Death Star Petition
by RK_Striker_JK_5 » Wed Dec 19, 2012 5:01 pm
Nah, just a Barack Obama stare of 'Are you fucking kidding me?!'
-
RK_Striker_JK_5 - 2 Star Admiral
- Posts: 8016
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 4:27 am
- Location: New Hampshire
Re: Death Star Petition
by Teaos » Sat Jan 12, 2013 9:18 am
-
Teaos - 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 13546
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:00 am
- Location: Behind you!
Re: Death Star Petition
by RK_Striker_JK_5 » Sat Jan 12, 2013 6:29 pm
"The Administration does not support blowing up planets," Shawcross wrote in a response to the 34,435 people who signed the petition on the White House website.
No flippin' duh.
-
RK_Striker_JK_5 - 2 Star Admiral
- Posts: 8016
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 4:27 am
- Location: New Hampshire
20 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Return to Politics and Current Events
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests