



colmquinn wrote:With ships as good as Battlestars was it any surprise the Cylon's used the sneak tactics they did rather face the fleet. Then again they did fight the Colonials to a standstill in the war 40 years ago or have I missed something in those flashbacks?
I'm not sure i like the idea of the retractable hanger bays idea, over complicating the system I think.

Cpl Kendall wrote:Probably just a limitation of their jump drive (might need a smaller profile), the Mercury class didn't have that limitation.


Rochey wrote:The cylons agreed to a ceasefire in the original war when the Final Five offered to show them Ressurection technology if they'd stop the war.



With ships as good as Battlestars was it any surprise the Cylon's used the sneak tactics they did rather face the fleet. Then again they did fight the Colonials to a standstill in the war 40 years ago or have I missed something in those flashbacks?
I'm not sure i like the idea of the retractable hanger bays idea, over complicating the system I think.

Deepcrush wrote:Since Battlestars seem to take 3 to 1 odds. The Cylons would need close to 400 Baseships if they want anything over a stalemate.
Think about how helpful a protected flight deck would have been during WW2.

Eh, they're tougher than basestars, but not that tough. Pegasus took on three basestars in "the Captain's Hand", and while she was just about able to hold them off, there was never going to be any question of her winning the battle - only surviving long enough to get FTL back up and running. Galactica expected to be able to hold off two ships in Exodus II, but no more, and four would have been enough to destroy her without suffering severe loss if Pegasus hadn't intervened.
You mean, for example, a 3" armoured flight deck and 4.5" box protection around the hangar sufficient to ward off 500 lb armour piercing bombs or 6" gunfire, and enough that kamikaze hits could be shrugged off and the ship back in action within an hour of being hit?![]()

Deepcrush wrote:Galactica being subpar and half scraped when the war started.
Pegasus was under refit and missing half her crew.
Take your pick, 3" armor or 10m of armor? A flight deck open to attack by said kamikaze or an inclosed flight deck which would only shake a little if a kamikaze hit the hull? Try to figure which is a better call.

She was certainly one of the weaker ships, but she's nonetheless a good example of what the average battlestar (rather than the top-of-the-line model such as Pegasus) should be capable of. I'm not sure what you mean by "half scraped" - she'd been destored, but that was it.
She rebuilt her crew from her civilian fleet and Galactica, and was fully operational by the time of the said battle. I don't recall any statement on the lines of a fully operational Mercury class ship being able to waltz through three basestars.
On a WW2 ship? 3" deck and and an open flight deck. So much extra armour and enclosing everything would make the ship a sitting duck, incapable of the strategic mobility required, and would have far too small an air group.

Deepcrush wrote:Galactica was being turned into a museum ship and had one launch bay turned into a tour room and much of her weapons/ammo removed.
I didn't say waltz through three Baseships, I said to be equal they'd need three Baseships.
Oh damn, I meant as in a starship would you want an open flight deck or a covered one? That was my fault sorry.

Return to Battlestar Galactica
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest