Luna Class

Trek Books, Games and General chat
Post Reply
Talondor
Master chief petty officer
Master chief petty officer
Posts: 98
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2015 6:38 am
Location: San Diego County, CA

Luna Class

Post by Talondor »

I was looking over the specs for the Luna Class and something struck me as not quite right. As I understand the class, it is designed for long-time, deep space exploration missions lasting three, four, even five years at a time. Operating by itself without any support from Starfleet or it's starbases and spaceports.

What struck me as odd that it had a torpedo strength of 2000, yet a phaser strength of 100. Wouldn't a ship designed to operate by itself for such a long time depend more on it's phasers then torpedoes since it could be years before it gets a chance to replenish it's torpedo supply? It also does not seem to have much in the way of hull armor and shield strength. I know the Federation is all about peaceful exploration, and I'm far from a expert of fictional Star Trek tech that would allow this discrepancy, but it seems to me to be a design flaw if it does happen to run into trouble so far from home.
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Luna Class

Post by Graham Kennedy »

When the Luna was designed, they stated emphatically that it was not built specifically for combat. Thus I wanted to avoid rating it too highly on overall combat strength. It rates low in most tactical-related areas because of that. But it rates high on torpedoes because the design brief on the ship specified that it had quantum torpedoes, which I presume to be more powerful than photons.

Yes, they could run out of torpedoes. Though Voyager never seemed to have that problem, which makes me think they might have worked out a way to replicate the things. (And why not?) But like they said, it's not a combat ship. The idea behind the design is not to go out and fight frequent battles. So they don't have the magazine capacity to support frequent battles.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Talondor
Master chief petty officer
Master chief petty officer
Posts: 98
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2015 6:38 am
Location: San Diego County, CA

Re: Luna Class

Post by Talondor »

Okay, I can see that. Primarily a ship of exploration. But you would still think they would not skimp on the shields.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Luna Class

Post by Mikey »

Not rivaling a dedicated combat ship =/= "skimping."
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Luna Class

Post by Graham Kennedy »

How well armed and armoured is the USNS Pathfinder? The Lunas do pretty well in comparison.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Luna Class

Post by Mikey »

Graham Kennedy wrote:How well armed and armoured is the USNS Pathfinder? The Lunas do pretty well in comparison.
Yeah, I doubt a Pathfinder-class naval vessel would handle atmospheric entry too well.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Post Reply