Moons
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:58 am
- Location: Right here.
Moons
My thoughts about the wormhole (see DS9 forum) led to me thinking about moons in star trek, and in particular, the fact that few of the surely hundreds of planets seen have moons present in the shot. This is quite easily explained by production constraints in the real world, but in universe, every habitable planet should have a moon according to modern planetary science (and not just any moon, but a large one, like the Earth's). It has been quite common to see the Earth's moon whenever Trek goes back home, but this is necessary because our moon is such a large part of our consciousness.
Modern science sees a large moon as vital to the presence of life on earth for a number of reasons, not the least of which is that the moon stabilizes the Earth's axis. While the Earth's axis still does "wobble" a bit, the movements are smaller in magnitude and limited in the degree over which they vary due to the moon's gravity. Without the moon, the Earth's axis would wobble far more violently (over a range anywhere from zero degrees - directly in line with the Earth-sun axis, to 90 degrees, straight "up and down" or perpendicular to the Earth-sun axis), with disastrous effects on climate, which would vary wildly, and consequently, disastrous effects for life on Earth.
Modern science sees a large moon as vital to the presence of life on earth for a number of reasons, not the least of which is that the moon stabilizes the Earth's axis. While the Earth's axis still does "wobble" a bit, the movements are smaller in magnitude and limited in the degree over which they vary due to the moon's gravity. Without the moon, the Earth's axis would wobble far more violently (over a range anywhere from zero degrees - directly in line with the Earth-sun axis, to 90 degrees, straight "up and down" or perpendicular to the Earth-sun axis), with disastrous effects on climate, which would vary wildly, and consequently, disastrous effects for life on Earth.
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wonderous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross... but it's not for the timid." Q, Q Who
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15368
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Well the obvious answer is time and money stopped them.
But in universe you may be able to explain it away by them just being out of shot.
You could also with a bit of a stretch argue that there could be some other gravitation factor that helps keep the planets stable with out the help of a moon.
But in universe you may be able to explain it away by them just being out of shot.
You could also with a bit of a stretch argue that there could be some other gravitation factor that helps keep the planets stable with out the help of a moon.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:58 am
- Location: Right here.
They conceivably could always be "behind" their planet whenever we see it, but this would be a coincidence of Galactic proportions.
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wonderous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross... but it's not for the timid." Q, Q Who
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Or it's SOP for a Starship to approach from the non-moon side for some reason. Perhaps so the helmsman doesn't run into it.Captain Picard's Hair wrote:They conceivably could always be "behind" their planet whenever we see it, but this would be a coincidence of Galactic proportions.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Given that it's Starfleet........I wouldn't be surprised if that was a regulation.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
- Bryan Moore
- Captain
- Posts: 2729
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 4:39 am
- Location: Perpetual Summer Camp
- Contact:
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
The Star Wars problem isn't so much the gravity well as the object forming it - smacking into a planet at a million times lightspeed is detrimental to one's health. As for Trek, the issue appears to be a navigational issue rather than a technological one - HMS Bounty went warp from Earth's upper atmosphere in ST4.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
In the Corellian Trilogy the Republic had to come up with a way to ignore gavity wells which kept shutting down their hyperdrives. I think its a bit more than running into things at 200,000x the speed of light. I think its the gravity makes the wormhole into hyperspace unstable but I'm not sure. But that's another thread.
I think there's more Trek examples of warp near a gravity well than not but I have heard a few lines saying they can't jump while in the planet's upper atsmosphere.
I think there's more Trek examples of warp near a gravity well than not but I have heard a few lines saying they can't jump while in the planet's upper atsmosphere.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
I remember in one episode of Voyager Chakotay was on the surface and huge (artificial) storms kept causing problems for transporters and shuttles so they tried landing the hole ship but got caught in a storm. I remember clearly that one of them suggested going to warp, but the inertia dampners were knocked offline.
In-atmosphere an in-system travel is possible but can be dangerous, especially in high-traffic areas.
In-atmosphere an in-system travel is possible but can be dangerous, especially in high-traffic areas.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Gravity wells seem to stop hyperdrives from working. The Interdictor class cruisers pull ships out of hyperspace by creating an artificial gravity well with their generators, so being near a planet probably stops the hyperdrive from working in some way.The Star Wars problem isn't so much the gravity well as the object forming it - smacking into a planet at a million times lightspeed is detrimental to one's health.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
The Interdictors work by tricking the hyperdrive into believing that there's a planet in the way when there isn't - the safeties cut in and cut the drive ("X Wing : Rogue Squadron"). The Centerpoint grav well, on the other hand, seems to pin the ship in place in hyperspace, and the safeties knock the ship out of hyperspace to avoid damaging the drive.Rochey wrote:Gravity wells seem to stop hyperdrives from working. The Interdictor class cruisers pull ships out of hyperspace by creating an artificial gravity well with their generators, so being near a planet probably stops the hyperdrive from working in some way.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.