Shooting "through" the shields?

Trek Books, Games and General chat
Captain Picard's Hair
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 4042
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:58 am
Location: Right here.

Shooting "through" the shields?

Post by Captain Picard's Hair »

Every time the Enterprise (any one of them)/Voyager/Defiant is in battle, we hear the order "target so-and-so system." In turn, the guys wearing funny costumes do the same unto us. The result of this is that the ship is hit and the weapons/propulsion/whatever goes down (they never need to target the transporter since it's never working when they need it!). We've seen it a gazillion times and we're used to it.

My question is, if the shields are up, how can enemy fire affect internal ship's systems? If the shields worked perfectly, it wouldn't matter where on the shield bubble the ship was hit; the only possible damage would be to the shields. Obviously, the writer's couldn't get their heads around the notion of shields that worked this way, just like they couldn't maintain the original vision of the Borg, and what I'm describing is so canon it's indisputable. However, there are never any mentions of shield "leakage" nor do we see fire impacting on the hull - we see shots hit the shields and stop there and don't see any sign of hull damage at all.
User avatar
DarkOmen
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 499
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 5:35 am
Location: CALIFORNIA
Contact:

Post by DarkOmen »

Maybe when they say shields at 80%, the shields absorb 80% of the incoming energy while the remaining 20% impacts the hulll....?
Captain Picard's Hair
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 4042
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:58 am
Location: Right here.

Post by Captain Picard's Hair »

Interesting interpretation. I'd tended to view those statements more as meaning that the capacity of the shield generators to hold up the shields was reduced to that amount, pending repair. But then, nobody every explicitly stated what "Shields at X percent" means...

I'd imagine that the percentage of energy that hits the hull might depend on how powerful the shot was, though. That is, the shields would block X amount of energy (X many joules), not X percent.
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15368
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Post by Teaos »

It is stated that shields come in different area like aft, foward, left, right.

Maybe if you hit a specific area you can overload it and shoot through for a while before it goes back up. When they say 80% that might be over all but one area is a bit weak.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
User avatar
Granitehewer
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2237
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: Teesside, England
Contact:

Post by Granitehewer »

maybe the internal damage caused when the shields are still up, allbeit at a diminished level is due to the kinetic energy causing horrendous vibrations, so bits and bobs of the systems 'pop out' and 'drop off', this vibration idea would thus explain worfs' hair straightening and curling, loosening and tightening and even changing shade in various scenes lol
PTLLS (Tees Achieve), DipHE App Bio (Northumbria), BSc Psychology (Teesside), Comparative Planetology (LJMU), High Energy Astrophysics (LJMU), Mobile Robotics/Physics (Swinburne), Genetics (SAC), Quant Meths (SAC)
https://www.facebook.com/PeterBrayshay
User avatar
Jim
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1907
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:32 pm
Location: Pittsburgh
Contact:

Post by Jim »

I view it as consoladation of fire. Sort of like punchin a single hole through a piece of paper. You do not have to take out the entire sheet of paper, just put one hole in it.
Ugh... do not thump the Book of G'Quan...
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Post by Captain Seafort »

It might be a side effect of their frequency-dependant shields - unless they can precisely match the frequency and phase angle of the incoming weapon, some of the energy will leak through.

Alternatively it may be waste heat from the shield equipment damaging surrounding equipment. They have to absorb, store, and emit the energy thrown at them, and if the energy of the weapons exceeds the storage capacity of their shields then some will leak into surrounding areas of the ship.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Post by Mikey »

I always a ssumed a scenario like Granitehewer's and Seafort's. The most intuitive interpretation of "shields at 80%" - and the only one that is helpful to use - is that "shields are currently at 80% of their original capacity." However, since attacks on the shields definitely put stresses on the shield generators, I sort of figured that damage to the systems local to the particular shields in question was "collateral" damage caused by both kinetic, thermal, chemical, (etc.) effects to the site of the generator.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Captain Picard's Hair
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 4042
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:58 am
Location: Right here.

Post by Captain Picard's Hair »

The "local damage to systems near the shield generators" is logical but we still need to explain the specificity of the damage that can be done. The captain will order that a particular system be taken out, and it will be done.

<Rochey>It does demonstrate bad design that a single hit on the hull can knock out an entire system, no?</Rochey>
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Post by Mikey »

Part of the problem is the fragility of starship systems. In other words, damage to a subsystem or part (perhaps to do damage to that local shield generator) often seems to disable that whole system, even ship-wide [/channels Rochey] :wink:

Out of universe, of course, being able to disable a specific system with minimal effort or collateral damage is a tremendously easy plot device.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Captain Picard's Hair
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 4042
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:58 am
Location: Right here.

Post by Captain Picard's Hair »

Out of universe, of course, being able to disable a specific system with minimal effort or collateral damage is a tremendously easy plot device.
"Tremendously easy plot device" could be the entire Star Trek Writer's guide. :P
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Captain Picard's Hair wrote:My question is, if the shields are up, how can enemy fire affect internal ship's systems?
Personaly, I've always thought of it as the weapons knocking 'holes' in the ship's shield. For example, when Worf says 'eighty percent shields remaining' he might mean that eighty percent of the whole shield is still up, but with a bunch of holes knocked out, allowing enemy weapons to slam into the hull.
This would also explain how the Enterprise was able to ram the Scimitar even though it still had 70 percent shields remaining.

Out of universe, it's simply because the writers are idiots.
<Rochey>It does demonstrate bad design that a single hit on the hull can knock out an entire system, no?</Rochey>
I see you've been reading these forums already. :wink:

And yes, it is incredibly stupid. I imagine its due to the overcentralised nature of Federation ships. Single hits in various locations can cause damage to, say, the computer controling the phasers, knocking them out without a backup to take control.
Mikey wrote: [/channels Rochey]
Okay, this is getting scary. Am I slowly turning each of you into clones of myself, or something? :|
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Post by Tsukiyumi »

Damn. At this rate, you'll assimilate the entire forum inside of a month... :wink:
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Post by Mikey »

Rochey wrote:Okay, this is getting scary. Am I slowly turning each of you into clones of myself, or something?
What, like that wasn't your plan? :wink:

Actually, you're not turning us into clones - we just know that if there is a knock against Federation starship design, then you MUST have said or thought it already. :P
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Captain Picard's Hair
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 4042
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:58 am
Location: Right here.

Post by Captain Picard's Hair »

Well, this one seems to affect EVERY race's ships in the Trek world.
Post Reply