SFDebris

Nickswitz · Post by **Nickswitz** » Thu Nov 25, 2010 2:27 am

http://sfdebris.blip.tv/

He has a new site that he's going to use.

And he's planning on lengthening the reviews a little, which means more fun.

Deepcrush · Post by **Deepcrush** » Thu Nov 25, 2010 4:07 am

It would be epic if he expanded the reviews. Do we need to sign up to the blipTV to watch?

Nickswitz · Post by **Nickswitz** » Thu Nov 25, 2010 4:12 am

Nope, no sign up required, it's all there, he just set it up today which is why he has very little on there right now.

Deepcrush · Post by **Deepcrush** » Thu Nov 25, 2010 4:12 am

Ah okay, good to know.

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Thu Dec 09, 2010 6:43 pm

I still think we should invite him to join the forum.

Tyyr · Post by **Tyyr** » Thu Dec 09, 2010 6:47 pm

I asked him about it before, said he was busy. He knew of us, and the debate in regards to Archer and Phlox's genocide.

Post by **Captain Seafort** » Thu Dec 09, 2010 6:56 pm

Where was that?

Tyyr · Post by **Tyyr** » Thu Dec 09, 2010 6:57 pm

E-mail, right after his Archer and Phlox genocide thing.

Post by **Graham Kennedy** » Fri Dec 10, 2010 5:47 pm

There's a guy who does internet movie reviews called Confused Matthew; SFdebris is a member of his forum, has his own section and everything. He might feel that that's a partnership that takes precedence over other forums. Though that forum isn't dedicated to Trek, and is nowhere near as big and active as ours is.

SolkaTruesilver · Post by **SolkaTruesilver** » Fri Dec 10, 2010 5:52 pm

Oh well. I suggest we leave the proposition on the table to have our forum to be SFDrebis' for episode discussion. He'll pick it up in case trouble spawns between him and the other man.

On the other hand, maybe it'd be a good idea to put together the different SFDrebris threads into a specific subforum? I think there are ennough to warrant it.

Post by **Captain Seafort** » Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:11 pm

GrahamKennedy wrote:Though that forum isn't dedicated to Trek, and is nowhere near as big and active as ours is.

True, but SDN dwarfs DITL, Chuck was one of the original ASVS intake there, and he's all but left. Given that I doubt subject matter and activity are of particular interest to him.

SolkaTruesilver wrote:On the other hand, maybe it'd be a good idea to put together the different SFDrebris threads into a specific subforum? I think there are ennough to warrant it.

They're much better suited to staying in their respective series fora.

SFDebris

SFDebris

Re: SFDebris

Re: SFDebris

Re: SFDebris

Re: SFDebris

Re: SFDebris

Re: SFDebris

Re: SFDebris

Re: SFDebris

Re: SFDebris

Re: SFDebris