Possible Roles For Fighters

Trek Books, Games and General chat
Post Reply
SomosFuga
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 647
Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 9:37 pm
Location: Perú

Possible Roles For Fighters

Post by SomosFuga »

Teaos wrote:Fighters generally = shuttles in trek
Yep, tha's pity, i would like to see more fighters and maybe a carrier on trek, espetially for DS9.
Trata las situaciones estresantes como lo haría 1 perro: si no puedes comértelo o jugar con ello, méate encima y lárgate!!!

Handle stressful situations as a dog would: if you can't eat it or play with it, pee on it and get out of there!!!
Lazar
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2232
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:29 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by Lazar »

SomosFuga wrote:Yep, tha's pity, i would like to see more fighters and maybe a carrier on trek, espetially for DS9.
Fighters and infantry were both rather neglected in Trek.
"There was also a large horse in the room, taking up most of it."
Sonic Glitch
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6026
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by Sonic Glitch »

Lazar wrote:
SomosFuga wrote:Yep, tha's pity, i would like to see more fighters and maybe a carrier on trek, espetially for DS9.
Fighters and infantry were both rather neglected almost completely ignored in Trek.
Fixed ;-)
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by Graham Kennedy »

As generally depicted, fighters were pretty much an obsolete concept in Trek.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by Aaron »

Yeah, seems they just used them in DS9 cause they needed every ship they had.
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Aye, only useful as distractions. In Trek, power generaly increases with size. So such small craft would be useless.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
SomosFuga
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 647
Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 9:37 pm
Location: Perú

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by SomosFuga »

What about a couple dozens of fighters carring 6 or 8 quantum torpedoes each, that would be some distraction.

My point is: if we saw a Danube Class fighting a Jem'hadar attack ship in DS9 ep "Treachery, Faith, and the Great River" why can't they have a ship of similar size, not being a multirole craft but a dedicated fighter, no cargo or passenger areas but with greater fire power, better shielding and much more maneuverability; would probably be short-range but that is why they need a carrier.
Trata las situaciones estresantes como lo haría 1 perro: si no puedes comértelo o jugar con ello, méate encima y lárgate!!!

Handle stressful situations as a dog would: if you can't eat it or play with it, pee on it and get out of there!!!
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by Mikey »

Now you're talking about a ship 1/3 the (purported) size of the Defiant, with a considerable investment in materials and materiel. Hardly a fighter. And I don't recall ever seeing a fighter carry QT's.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Lazar
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2232
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:29 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by Lazar »

Mikey wrote:Now you're talking about a ship 1/3 the (purported) size of the Defiant,
The Defiant's length is very uncertain, but certainly nowhere near 1/3 the mass.
"There was also a large horse in the room, taking up most of it."
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by Mikey »

I never said anything about mass. And according to visual canon, the Defiant's length is sometimes in the vicinity of 60 - 70m (among other figures.) In any event, the runabout's size and format make it noticeably different from a fighter. 'Trek fighters would be more like... the fighters we saw. And what ep showed those carriers you mentioned?
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by Tsukiyumi »

Mikey wrote:...'Trek fighters would be more like... the fighters we saw...
I'm sure they could build a heavier fighter if needed. Regardless, you'd think they could slap a full-size photon on each one, have them fire a wave of ordinance, and then return to whatever ship launched them.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Lazar
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2232
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:29 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by Lazar »

Mikey wrote:I never said anything about mass. And according to visual canon, the Defiant's length is sometimes in the vicinity of 60 - 70m (among other figures.)
Well you didn't specify whether by size you meant length or mass; but yes, the visual canon can put the Defiant anywhere between 60 m and 170 m. I think the most reasonable figure would be about 120 m; EAS does have a picture of the Defiant (shown as about 170 m) dwarfing a runabout.
Mikey wrote:And what ep showed those carriers you mentioned?
I didn't mention carriers. :?
Last edited by Lazar on Fri Jul 17, 2009 6:44 am, edited 5 times in total.
"There was also a large horse in the room, taking up most of it."
User avatar
Lighthawk
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 4632
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:55 pm
Location: Missouri, USA, North America, Earth, Sol System, Orion Arm, Milkyway Galaxy, Local Group, Universe

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by Lighthawk »

Tsukiyumi wrote:
Mikey wrote:...'Trek fighters would be more like... the fighters we saw...
I'm sure they could build a heavier fighter if needed. Regardless, you'd think they could slap a full-size photon on each one, have them fire a wave of ordinance, and then return to whatever ship launched them.
You should be able to slap a couple full sized photons on each. A torp isn't much bigger than a lot of missiles/bombs/what-have-you that modern fighters/bombers carry, and is smaller than some of said weapons. And modern warplanes tend to carry more than one boom tube with them at a time.

A dozen or so fighters with just a pair of torps each would be a pretty powerful little force, at least for a volley or two.
Image
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by Tsukiyumi »

Lighthawk wrote:...A dozen or so fighters with just a pair of torps each would be a pretty powerful little force, at least for a volley or two.
Agreed. 24 photons would be more than double a GCS volley, while only putting 12 people in harm's way. Lather, rinse, repeat. I think fighters could be effective; the Federation just chooses not to field them.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
SomosFuga
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 647
Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 9:37 pm
Location: Perú

Re: Info on the USS Kelvin

Post by SomosFuga »

Mikey wrote:Now you're talking about a ship 1/3 the (purported) size of the Defiant, with a considerable investment in materials and materiel. Hardly a fighter. And I don't recall ever seeing a fighter carry QT's.
That would be a huge fighter but is not what i had in mind. If we take DITL numbers as at least roughly acurate, and i think most of them are, this is what we have.

Danube Class:
Length : 23.1 m
Beam : 14 m
Height : 5.4 m
Decks : 1
Mass : 158.72 metric tons
Crew : 1, 40 evacuation limit

Defiant Class:
Length : 170.68 m
Beam : 134.11 m
Height : 30.1 m
Decks : 46
Mass : 355,000 metric tons
Crew : 50, 150 evacuation limit

So a Danube is not 1/3 the size of a Defiant. You could have a fighter of about 20m long. That would be much heavier than a Peregrine.

About the torpedoes, you don't have to get the torpedo inside the ship, there are hardpoints. Of course the fighter may have other weapons like pulse or regular phasers too.
Trata las situaciones estresantes como lo haría 1 perro: si no puedes comértelo o jugar con ello, méate encima y lárgate!!!

Handle stressful situations as a dog would: if you can't eat it or play with it, pee on it and get out of there!!!
Post Reply