Quantum Torpedoes?

Trek Books, Games and General chat
robjkay
Senior chief petty officer
Senior chief petty officer
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 8:42 pm

Quantum Torpedoes?

Post by robjkay »

I was wondering about SF Quantum Torpedoes.

1. Is a Quantum Torpedo bigger or larger then a Photon Torpedo?
2. Can a Quantum Torpedo fire from a regular torpedo launcher? Meaning can any ship fire them?
3. Is a Quantum Torpedo a short range weapon? Being it seems the Defiant is always firing them at point blank range.
4. Being the Sovereign has a turret launcher to fire there Quantum Torpedoes, does this mean that the guidance system for the weapon is less advanced then a Photon Torpedo?
Blackstar the Chakat
Banned
Posts: 5594
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm

Re: Quantum Torpedoes?

Post by Blackstar the Chakat »

robjkay wrote:I was wondering about SF Quantum Torpedoes.

1. Is a Quantum Torpedo bigger or larger then a Photon Torpedo?
2. Can a Quantum Torpedo fire from a regular torpedo launcher? Meaning can any ship fire them?
3. Is a Quantum Torpedo a short range weapon? Being it seems the Defiant is always firing them at point blank range.
4. Being the Sovereign has a turret launcher to fire there Quantum Torpedoes, does this mean that the guidance system for the weapon is less advanced then a Photon Torpedo?


Hmmm... those are some good questions. The Defiant has fired both Photons and Quantums so they should be about the same size. However it's possible that they could be bigger and the tubes can still fire smaller photons, but in one Voyager episode they were planning to salvage and adapt Q-torps for their ship, but it was unclear if they were federation issue or cardassian technology. As for Range, there is no reason to assume a shorter range. The Defiants style has always been close and personal. E-e seemed to fire them from a good distance, and a turret may be to increase short range accuracy. However there is little canon data other then they're way more destructive then Photons.
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15368
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Post by Teaos »

The size maybe slightly different but I am pretty sure you cant fire a QT out of a PT tube.

The Sov has fired a couple of semi long range shots. I cant imagin any reason why they would be less accurate.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Post by Deepcrush »

The sov's turret was to allow the ship to fire at a 180* forward arc. In theory that would allow them to fire sideways and then the QT could turn another 90* on its own and strike at someone behind them. But they are larger the PTs and i'm not sure if you can fire PTs out of a QTL, ask the site master for that one!
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Post by Sionnach Glic »

1. Is a Quantum Torpedo bigger or larger then a Photon Torpedo?
I would imagine they are the same size, aproximately, given that we've seen Defiant carry both types without any aparent upgrades.
2. Can a Quantum Torpedo fire from a regular torpedo launcher? Meaning can any ship fire them?
Seems possible. Unless the launch mechanism is quite a bit different I can't see any reason they couldn't.
3. Is a Quantum Torpedo a short range weapon? Being it seems the Defiant is always firing them at point blank range.
The Defiant's tactics seem to revolve around close quaters combat, so I doubt we could judge from that. Although its possible that if the torpedo has a larger payload, it would also have less fuel.
4. Being the Sovereign has a turret launcher to fire there Quantum Torpedoes, does this mean that the guidance system for the weapon is less advanced then a Photon Torpedo?
Again, that's possible due to size constraints. Although its more likely that the Federation realised the superiority of a turreted launcher over a stationary launcher.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Quantum Torpedoes?

Post by Captain Seafort »

robjkay wrote:I was wondering about SF Quantum Torpedoes.

1. Is a Quantum Torpedo bigger or larger then a Photon Torpedo?
Difficult to tell. PTs have always appeared as points of light, whereas QTs appear more elongated (best shown here). They may be slightly bigger, but not hugely so.
2. Can a Quantum Torpedo fire from a regular torpedo launcher? Meaning can any ship fire them?
I doubt it. PTs can certainly fire from QT tubes, given that the Defiant has fired both, but we've never seen QTs fired from a PT launcher. It's possible that launchers can be modified during a refit, given that the Lakota carried QTs, but it's more likely that they ripped out the old launchers and put new ones in.
3. Is a Quantum Torpedo a short range weapon? Being it seems the Defiant is always firing them at point blank range.
As Blackstar said, the Defiant has always engaged at short range, so that may be a targetting issue for the ship rather than the weapons. The E-E fired from what appeared to be a fair range at the Borg Sphere in First Contact.
4. Being the Sovereign has a turret launcher to fire there Quantum Torpedoes, does this mean that the guidance system for the weapon is less advanced then a Photon Torpedo?


The Sovvies' main torpedo launcher has always been something of a mystery to me - it's placement is good, being about as close to the centre of the ship's forward profile as possible, but it's also somewhat vulnerable to enemy fire, protruding from the hull as it does. Insurrection put the lift and docking clamps for the captain's yacht in the same place. I don't see how all those systems can fit in that space. It's possible that the turret is usually stored in the hull above the bulge (much as DS9's turrets are usually tucked away inside the weapons sails) and lowers into the forward half of it for firing, leaving the aft half clear for the yacht's docking systems.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Blackstar the Chakat
Banned
Posts: 5594
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm

Post by Blackstar the Chakat »

That retractable turret idea is a pretty good explination. I'm not sure I'd want to complicate the system like that when a different placement would work just as well.

Maybe the QTs are a little longer which is why they may not be fired out of a PT tube. I doubt it could be too much larger in width and height though, that would make firing PTs more difficult.
robjkay
Senior chief petty officer
Senior chief petty officer
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 8:42 pm

Post by robjkay »

Well it always seems that Photon Torpedoes have a longer range and are more of a better guidance system. It seems when a Quatum Torpedo is fired its at real close range and normally aimed or guided in a straight line.

Wondering if the Q-torp uses the same casing as a Photon Torp that maybe it has a larger warhead to where it sacrifices range and maneuverability.

The reason I say is because you would think there would be more of a difference between the torpedoes other then firepower. The Photon Torpedo was a weapon that allready reached it limits to where it could not upgraded anymore.

Also being the Q-torp uses exotic materials, is this why it has not been only two ships the Sovereign and the Defiant carries the weapon? I would think more ship would be carring at least a combination of both weapons especially during the Dominion War making them more capable of defeating enemy ships.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Post by Captain Seafort »

ChakatBlackstar wrote:That retractable turret idea is a pretty good explination. I'm not sure I'd want to complicate the system like that when a different placement would work just as well.
I wouldn't either, but it's canon that both the main QT launcher and the Captain's yacht are located in the bulge at the bottom of the saucer. I'd rather have a more complicated system that keeps all the important stuff (AM storage and loading being the most important) as deep inside the ship as possible. Besides, when given the choice between a simple solution and a complicated one, which do you think Starfleet would choose?
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Post by Captain Seafort »

ChakatBlackstar wrote:That retractable turret idea is a pretty good explination. I'm not sure I'd want to complicate the system like that when a different placement would work just as well.
I wouldn't either, but it's canon that both the main QT launcher and the Captain's yacht are located in the bulge at the bottom of the saucer. I'd rather have a more complicated system that keeps all the important stuff (AM storage and loading being the most important) as deep inside the ship as possible. Besides, when given the choice between a simple solution and a complicated one, which do you think Starfleet would choose?
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Blackstar the Chakat
Banned
Posts: 5594
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm

Post by Blackstar the Chakat »

True, or maybe it's bigger on the inside.

As for the earlier question about the reason Q-torps are used less is that 1) they may be more difficult or expensive to manufacture and/or 2) It would be difficult to refit the entire fleet with Quantum torpedo launchers. And with the war it would be even more difficult to keep up with demand.
User avatar
Captain Peabody
Lieutenant jg
Lieutenant jg
Posts: 280
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 1:31 am
Location: Birmingham, AL, USA

Post by Captain Peabody »

Interesting...I agree mainly with Captain Seafort's answers...

...but, another question; what advantages (if any), have Quantum torpedoes been shown to have over Photons, canonically speaking? Is a canon comparison of the two possible?

I leave these questions in your capable hands... :)
"Lo, blessed are our ears for they have heard;
Yea, blessed are our eyes for they have seen:
Let the thunder break on man and beast and bird
And the lightning. It is something to have been."

-The Great Minimum, G.K. Chesterton
Blackstar the Chakat
Banned
Posts: 5594
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm

Post by Blackstar the Chakat »

Captain Peabody wrote:Interesting...I agree mainly with Captain Seafort's answers...

...but, another question; what advantages (if any), have Quantum torpedoes been shown to have over Photons, canonically speaking? Is a canon comparison of the two possible?

I leave these questions in your capable hands... :)
They do more damage, make the Borg go boom, and they look cooler.
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Post by Sionnach Glic »

IIRC, isn't it the Transphasic torps' that kill the borg?
But yeah, aside from that they just look pretty and do more damage.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Monroe
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 5837
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:17 am

Post by Monroe »

As for the torps going 90 degrees to hit targets today we have sidewinders that can do that so its no push of the imagination for all missiles in Star Trek to be able to do that.
Post Reply