Star Trek Online Ship Design

McAvoy · Post by **McAvoy** » Thu Jul 09, 2009 2:42 am

I like the Excalibur. It's different. The Norway-Akira love baby looks ok, the rest suck.

Post by **Mikey** » Thu Jul 09, 2009 3:01 pm

These make me glad that I'm not much of a gamer. Seriously, with the amount of coin people are going to put down for this, they could at least expect an interesting and well-thought design in return.

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:51 pm

Well, there's one game I'm not spending money on unless I hear nothing but awesomeness about it.

Aaron · Post by **Aaron** » Fri Jul 10, 2009 11:56 pm

Frankly, they should be paying us as compensation for two decades of garbage Trek games.

Atekimogus · Post by **Atekimogus** » Sun Jul 12, 2009 8:26 am

Well, as I thought the consens seems to be that most new designs are utter crap yet when one reads the forum entries to the new ships legions of fanbois have nothing but praise for those abominations which makes me wonder how many of those are real posts and how many are from the makers of the game themselves...... .

Reliant121 · Post by **Reliant121** » Sun Jul 12, 2009 1:32 pm

Unfortunately, Trek Fanboys tend to find anything sleek and powerful looking like a digital orgasm.

The epitome of meh tbh.

Tyyr · Post by **Tyyr** » Mon Jul 13, 2009 6:43 pm

Look at the legions of truly AWFUL fan ships out there. There are a lot of people with absolutely ZERO taste.

Reliant121 · Post by **Reliant121** » Sat Jul 25, 2009 11:40 am

Sorry to necro, but they have done a new klingon "Super carrier". the specs are shifty at best, but I think they did quite well design wise. It looks like a D-5 in the Time period that it SHOULD have been.

Post by **Teaos** » Sat Jul 25, 2009 12:33 pm

Interesting... Not sure if I like it or not. I need something next to it for scale, it seems like its really small but its supposed to be a carrier.

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Sat Jul 25, 2009 1:44 pm

Looks more like a Klingon version of a Runabout to me. Still, not a bad design.

steamrunner · Post by **steamrunner** » Sat Jul 25, 2009 1:47 pm

Are those structures under the wings the landing bays?

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Sat Jul 25, 2009 1:49 pm

I just realised. From the fron it looks a lot like a rounder version of the Daedalus from SG-1.

Reliant121 · Post by **Reliant121** » Sat Jul 25, 2009 6:11 pm

Specs and stuff if anyone is interested

steamrunner · Post by **steamrunner** » Sun Jul 26, 2009 7:53 am

Ah, yes, ablative armor for a super-carrier...

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Sun Jul 26, 2009 11:59 am

Well that's retarded. Carriers aren't supposed to be anywhere near the battle itself. Wasting so much resources on armouring them is just dumb.

Star Trek Online Ship Design

Re: Star Trek Online Ship Design

Re: Star Trek Online Ship Design

Re: Star Trek Online Ship Design

Re: Star Trek Online Ship Design

Re: Star Trek Online Ship Design

Re: Star Trek Online Ship Design

Re: Star Trek Online Ship Design

Re: Star Trek Online Ship Design

Re: Star Trek Online Ship Design

Re: Star Trek Online Ship Design

Re: Star Trek Online Ship Design

Re: Star Trek Online Ship Design

Re: Star Trek Online Ship Design

Re: Star Trek Online Ship Design

Re: Star Trek Online Ship Design