Seafort Vs Thorin

Trek Books, Games and General chat
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Seafort Vs Thorin

Post by Deepcrush »

Captain Seafort wrote:No, it isn't - you're talking about a difference of fifteen hundredths of one percent. That is not enough to make any difference in any practical situation.
If one guy can escape while the other can't. That's a difference.

I'm not sure what this "practical situation" is. When is battle ever a "practical situation"?
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Coalition
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 1145
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:34 am
Location: Georgia, United States
Contact:

Re: Fed ground combat again

Post by Coalition »

Thorin wrote:
Coalition wrote: 100 km/s is roughly 1/3 c. Assuming phasers beams move at c, that puts the effective combat radius at 1/3 that compared to phasers. That's a good reason not to use kinetic weaponry as your primary armament. You'd have to drop the projectile mass down and increase the speed, and at that point, you are firing a particle beam rather than a railgun/coilgun.
What? You're out by about 1000 there. c = 300,000 km/s. Hence 1/3 c = 100,000 km/s. Or 100,000,000 m/s. Or 100 Mm/s.
I screwed up. I was thinking 100 kilo km/s.
Relativity Calculator
My Nomination for "MVAM Critic Award" (But can it be broken into 3 separate pieces?)
Post Reply