Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15368
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?
Anyone ever heard of metal storm? 1 million shots a minute.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 1107
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 5:53 am
- Location: Somewhere in the universe
Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?
What about the Plasma repeaters that the Kull Warriors have in Stargate. That seemed pretty automatic.
There is not a problem in this world that can't be solved without the proper application of a sufficient number of thermonuclear ordnance.
-
- Commander
- Posts: 1313
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 4:49 pm
- Location: Gridley, CA.
Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?
I have, Teaos. It's amazing because there are no moving parts, no firing pin, and the ammo is stored in the barrels. Check it out here:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metal_stormTeaos wrote:Anyone ever heard of metal storm? 1 million shots a minute.
Man, I love Wikipedia!
"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." -Benjamin Franklin-
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?
Yeah, I saw that thing too. Quiet as a mouse, because of the lack of action. Scary thing to be on the wrong end of, that's for sure.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?
I don't know if those make 10 rounds a second but they're at least getting close.JudgeKing wrote:What about the Plasma repeaters that the Kull Warriors have in Stargate. That seemed pretty automatic.
I selected 10 rounds a second as that's the slowest rate of fire I know of on a modern full auto small arm. Almost all assault rifles/SMGs fall in between 10 and 15 rounds per second.
Metal storm is a little misleading. They have a technically high rate of fire, but since they don't really reload it's more of a burst. So what Metal Storm does feels an awful lot like saying my shotgun has a million per minute rate of fire because it sends a few dozen pellets out all at once.
Frankly I think Metal Storm technology would work better as a 3 shot burst or single shot system mounted on something like a UAV that could take advantage of the lightweight nature of the system.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?
AFAIK, the intent is to develop it for remote use on UGV's as well as the lighter types of manned utility vehicles and remote-operated fixed emplacements.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 21747
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
- Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
- Contact:
Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?
Here's a great idea for application of Metal Storm technology: AICW
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?
Yeah, if you crank the gas pressure up. Which is only supposed to be done once the weapon has become fouled and you need the pressure to maintain fire, though try telling that to the gunner.Mikey wrote:There are SMG's and some assault rifles with up to 1.5 times that rate ROF, most notably, some of the more modern Fabrique Nationale models - the MINIMI has been rated at up to 1150 rounds/minute.
As for what the military calls weapons that have varying rates of fire: it's just automatic. Most of the automatic weapons in the miltary can have varying rates anyways. Weapons are subdivided according to their role and size but a 25mm Bushmaster cannon is an automatic weapon just as a C-7 service rifle is.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?
That was a point I made earlier - "automatic" refers to the fact that it keeps firing as long as you hold the trigger, not to any particular ROF.
Good to see you back, BTW.
Good to see you back, BTW.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?
Thanks dude. Even a weapons cyclic rate really only refers to how many rounds go down range with an uninterrupted supply of ammo. The M2HB has a cyclic rate of 600 rounds a minute (max) but it's practical rate is around forty, unless you really enjoy a busted gun and jello arms.Mikey wrote:That was a point I made earlier - "automatic" refers to the fact that it keeps firing as long as you hold the trigger, not to any particular ROF.
Good to see you back, BTW.
Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?
What's wrong with Jell-O arms?
Last edited by stitch626 on Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?
Besides making you combat ineffective? I suppose your mates could eat them for a snack.stitch626 wrote:What's wrong with Jello arms?
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?
There's always room for Jell-O!
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- Commander
- Posts: 1313
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 4:49 pm
- Location: Gridley, CA.
Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?
Except for the lime green! IT'S EEEEVVVIIILLLL!!!! *cue swirling grey clouds, thunder, and lightning*
"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." -Benjamin Franklin-