Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?

Trek Books, Games and General chat
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15368
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?

Post by Teaos »

Anyone ever heard of metal storm? 1 million shots a minute.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
JudgeKing
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 5:53 am
Location: Somewhere in the universe

Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?

Post by JudgeKing »

What about the Plasma repeaters that the Kull Warriors have in Stargate. That seemed pretty automatic.
There is not a problem in this world that can't be solved without the proper application of a sufficient number of thermonuclear ordnance.
mwhittington
Commander
Commander
Posts: 1313
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 4:49 pm
Location: Gridley, CA.

Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?

Post by mwhittington »

Teaos wrote:Anyone ever heard of metal storm? 1 million shots a minute.
I have, Teaos. It's amazing because there are no moving parts, no firing pin, and the ammo is stored in the barrels. Check it out here:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metal_storm
Man, I love Wikipedia!
"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." -Benjamin Franklin-
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?

Post by Mikey »

Yeah, I saw that thing too. Quiet as a mouse, because of the lack of action. Scary thing to be on the wrong end of, that's for sure.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
sunnyside
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2711
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 5:35 pm

Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?

Post by sunnyside »

JudgeKing wrote:What about the Plasma repeaters that the Kull Warriors have in Stargate. That seemed pretty automatic.
I don't know if those make 10 rounds a second but they're at least getting close.

I selected 10 rounds a second as that's the slowest rate of fire I know of on a modern full auto small arm. Almost all assault rifles/SMGs fall in between 10 and 15 rounds per second.

Metal storm is a little misleading. They have a technically high rate of fire, but since they don't really reload it's more of a burst. So what Metal Storm does feels an awful lot like saying my shotgun has a million per minute rate of fire because it sends a few dozen pellets out all at once.

Frankly I think Metal Storm technology would work better as a 3 shot burst or single shot system mounted on something like a UAV that could take advantage of the lightweight nature of the system.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?

Post by Mikey »

AFAIK, the intent is to develop it for remote use on UGV's as well as the lighter types of manned utility vehicles and remote-operated fixed emplacements.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?

Post by Tsukiyumi »

Here's a great idea for application of Metal Storm technology: AICW
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re:

Post by Aaron »

stitch626 wrote:I can't remember... does BSG (original and new, I count them as separate universes, though I ignore the middle one) have autos.

Yes to both.
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?

Post by Aaron »

Mikey wrote:There are SMG's and some assault rifles with up to 1.5 times that rate ROF, most notably, some of the more modern Fabrique Nationale models - the MINIMI has been rated at up to 1150 rounds/minute.
Yeah, if you crank the gas pressure up. Which is only supposed to be done once the weapon has become fouled and you need the pressure to maintain fire, though try telling that to the gunner. :roll:

As for what the military calls weapons that have varying rates of fire: it's just automatic. Most of the automatic weapons in the miltary can have varying rates anyways. Weapons are subdivided according to their role and size but a 25mm Bushmaster cannon is an automatic weapon just as a C-7 service rifle is.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?

Post by Mikey »

That was a point I made earlier - "automatic" refers to the fact that it keeps firing as long as you hold the trigger, not to any particular ROF.

Good to see you back, BTW.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?

Post by Aaron »

Mikey wrote:That was a point I made earlier - "automatic" refers to the fact that it keeps firing as long as you hold the trigger, not to any particular ROF.

Good to see you back, BTW.
Thanks dude. Even a weapons cyclic rate really only refers to how many rounds go down range with an uninterrupted supply of ammo. The M2HB has a cyclic rate of 600 rounds a minute (max) but it's practical rate is around forty, unless you really enjoy a busted gun and jello arms.
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?

Post by stitch626 »

What's wrong with Jell-O arms?
Last edited by stitch626 on Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?

Post by Aaron »

stitch626 wrote:What's wrong with Jello arms?
Besides making you combat ineffective? I suppose your mates could eat them for a snack.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?

Post by Mikey »

There's always room for Jell-O!
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
mwhittington
Commander
Commander
Posts: 1313
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 4:49 pm
Location: Gridley, CA.

Re: Why does sci-fi not have energy-based automatic weapons?

Post by mwhittington »

Except for the lime green! IT'S EEEEVVVIIILLLL!!!! :happydevil: *cue swirling grey clouds, thunder, and lightning*
"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." -Benjamin Franklin-
Post Reply