How powerful are photon torpedoes, really?

Trek Books, Games and General chat
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

How powerful are photon torpedoes, really?

Post by Sionnach Glic »

As the title says, how powerful are photorps? For the purposes of this debate, let's stick purely with observed canon evidence from the shows and movies. Non-canon sources, such as the TM, are not admissable in this debate.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Post by Captain Seafort »

The only events I can think of that would allow calculations would be the maximum yield of Enterprise's photonic torpedos being able to "put a three kilometre crater into an asteroid", and the Pegasus asteroid that would have required the full arsenal of the E-D to destroy it (250 torps, ish). SDN's asteroid destruction calculator would be a useful tool for that aproach. Unfortunately my computer's been giving me grief for months so I can't get onto the main SDN site.

We could also approach the problem by looking at the observed shielding limitations of various ships and working back.
Last edited by Captain Seafort on Wed May 21, 2008 9:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Post by Sionnach Glic »

How big was the asteroid in Pegasus?
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Post by Captain Seafort »

Rochey wrote:How big was the asteroid in Pegasus?
About 12 1/2 km by 8 1/2, by my calculations here.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Okay, cool. I'll plug some numbers into SDN's calculator and see what I get.

Since the calculator assumes a spherical asteroid, this'll be off by a bit. I'm going to assume that a ten kilometre spherical asteroid would have roughly the same mass, though it'd probably have quite a bit more.
My second assumption is that they're aiming just to break the asteroid up (given that they were searching for a ship inside it, this makes sense).

Total energy required to fragment it is 1 gigatonne.
Divide that by 250 (the number of torps), and we get a figure of 4 megatonnes (I think). This figure seems to go fairly well with what we see torps doing to ships.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Post by Graham Kennedy »

200 isotons.

:)
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Per torp? :?

That's rather.....unimpressive. Doesn't 'iso' just mean 1? :?
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Post by Mikey »

"iso-" in Star Trek actually means "this is a generic prefix we use to make something sound all futuristic and science-y."
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Duskofdead
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1913
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 8:06 pm

Re: How powerful are photon torpedoes, really?

Post by Duskofdead »

Rochey wrote:As the title says, how powerful are photorps? For the purposes of this debate, let's stick purely with observed canon evidence from the shows and movies. Non-canon sources, such as the TM, are not admissable in this debate.
If we go with observed evidence, then in general, photon torpedoes are really, really weak. They're on par with a strong handheld weapon or something. :( The fact that a relatively tiny portion of ship shields "light up" to deflect the energy explosion from a photon doesn't inspire much awe about the scope of their destructive power.

They tend to get tossed like candy in battles. "Serious ships" seem to shrug them off. Only technologically inferior ships seem to have cause to worry. We can assume at least from dialogue that they pack a lot more punch per "hit" than phasers, and that this "hit" is a relatively set amount (given multiple statements in various combat situations along the lines of "a torpedo should do it", "it was that last torpedo", "one more photon should take out their weapons", etc.) but what we can observe, visually, tends to jar out of proportion with this. Photons never seem to have a "big burst" or do any concussive damage, they seem to just hit shields and disappear like any other energy weapon.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Post by Captain Seafort »

I'm not sure what sort of handheld weapon you're thinking about - torpedoes are pretty consistently in the high kT/low MT range. Slightly more powerful than most modern nuclear warheards, which is very impressive given that they're ubiquitous in Trek.

Of course, these numbers are for TNG-era warheads, which are roughly five times as powerful as their movie-era counterparts.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Post by Graham Kennedy »

If you want the REAL answer, based purely on the canon evidence?

Photon torpedoes are as strong or as weak as the plot needs them to be.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
User avatar
Duskofdead
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1913
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 8:06 pm

Post by Duskofdead »

GrahamKennedy wrote:If you want the REAL answer, based purely on the canon evidence?

Photon torpedoes are as strong or as weak as the plot needs them to be.
Yup. Very inconsistent. They range from hitting a lot of ships in an area of effect to looking like someone tossed a grenade at a starship.
User avatar
Duskofdead
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1913
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 8:06 pm

Post by Duskofdead »

Captain Seafort wrote:I'm not sure what sort of handheld weapon you're thinking about - torpedoes are pretty consistently in the high kT/low MT range. Slightly more powerful than most modern nuclear warheards, which is very impressive given that they're ubiquitous in Trek.

Of course, these numbers are for TNG-era warheads, which are roughly five times as powerful as their movie-era counterparts.
Yes I understand what you are saying from a dialogue point of view. I was comparing observed visual effect. The visual effect of a photon is typically nothing even close to a nuclear detonation.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Post by Captain Seafort »

Most of the time nuclear detonations would look pretty pathetic in space - most of the energy would be released as gamma radiation, and since we know nothing of shield mechanics we can't determine yield from the flashes they make.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
Duskofdead
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1913
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 8:06 pm

Post by Duskofdead »

Even the effect aboardship, though. The ship does not seem particularly more violently shaken by a photon torp than by a phaser impact, even though it should. (Should an energy weapon even CAUSE the ship to shake, unless it made something blow up?)
Post Reply