Sure we have. In "Dark Frontier", ships about to obliterate the Queen's fleet (which looked to be at minimum 3 ships, a diamond and two cubes, but could have been more) were stated to be "no longer a threat" the moment they adapted shields which were on the verge of complete failure. There was no statement that shields were holding "for now", or that the safety was temporary. They leisurely went about assimilation afterwards with seemingly no fear of the alien weapons.We've never seen any evidence of the latter, merely that it's a lot easier for a given type of weapon to damage them pre-adaptation than post-adaptation.
Star Trek Vs Modern Earth
- Duskofdead
- Captain
- Posts: 1913
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 8:06 pm
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Or start earlier in the afternoon... or morning... It's always 5 o'clock SOMEWHERE.kostmayer wrote:I just misread this topic title as "Star Trek vs Middle Earth"
I should lay off the scotch this early in the evening.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
I was refering to your statement that "any level of firepower...won't do you any good after they've adapted." All Dark Frontier demonstrates is that after adaptation the Borg shields are sufficiently optimised that the ships they were facing were no longer a threat.Duskofdead wrote:Sure we have. In "Dark Frontier", ships about to obliterate the Queen's fleet (which looked to be at minimum 3 ships, a diamond and two cubes, but could have been more) were stated to be "no longer a threat" the moment they adapted shields which were on the verge of complete failure. There was no statement that shields were holding "for now", or that the safety was temporary. They leisurely went about assimilation afterwards with seemingly no fear of the alien weapons.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 13002
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact:
- Duskofdead
- Captain
- Posts: 1913
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 8:06 pm
I agree with you in this regard. But successful adaptation ramps up protection against a particular weapon so high that merely tweaking around with that same weapon's firepower a little isn't a very efficient strategy vs. the Borg. That's why I wish we'd seen more weapons diversification rather than simply upgrading phasers or adding more phaser arrays on newer designs. I think a "tomorrow's Defiant", so to speak, should be a platform fielding at minimum three different types of weapons. The easiest candidates seem to be phasers, disruptors and either a plasma or poleron based weapon.Captain Seafort wrote:I was refering to your statement that "any level of firepower...won't do you any good after they've adapted." All Dark Frontier demonstrates is that after adaptation the Borg shields are sufficiently optimised that the ships they were facing were no longer a threat.Duskofdead wrote:Sure we have. In "Dark Frontier", ships about to obliterate the Queen's fleet (which looked to be at minimum 3 ships, a diamond and two cubes, but could have been more) were stated to be "no longer a threat" the moment they adapted shields which were on the verge of complete failure. There was no statement that shields were holding "for now", or that the safety was temporary. They leisurely went about assimilation afterwards with seemingly no fear of the alien weapons.
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Reed found it very effective in "Regeneration" - by doubling the yield of the phase pistols he was able to punch through Borg shields. There's also the possibility of concentrated fire to consider - it proved very effctive against the cube in FC.Duskofdead wrote:I agree with you in this regard. But successful adaptation ramps up protection against a particular weapon so high that merely tweaking around with that same weapon's firepower a little isn't a very efficient strategy vs. the Borg.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
- Duskofdead
- Captain
- Posts: 1913
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 8:06 pm
Those are workarounds in instances where you have to deal with adaptation. The Federation has a wealth of diverse types of technology at its disposal, always sticking with "phasers and photons" seems to be more of a flavor issue than an "in-universe makes most sense" issue to me.Captain Seafort wrote:Reed found it very effective in "Regeneration" - by doubling the yield of the phase pistols he was able to punch through Borg shields. There's also the possibility of concentrated fire to consider - it proved very effctive against the cube in FC.Duskofdead wrote:I agree with you in this regard. But successful adaptation ramps up protection against a particular weapon so high that merely tweaking around with that same weapon's firepower a little isn't a very efficient strategy vs. the Borg.
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15368
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Also the faxt that the Feds are expects at phasers but not disruptors. Unless we brough the tech off the klingons or someone we couldnt field powerful ones for quite awhile.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
- Duskofdead
- Captain
- Posts: 1913
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 8:06 pm
Given the Federation's extensive experience repairing Klingon ships and even Romulan ones during the war, and working closely with them, I don't think making respectable disruptors is at all outside their capabilities. And besides, phasers are not monopolized by the Federation, it seems to be a fairly generic weapon that many societies use.
- Duskofdead
- Captain
- Posts: 1913
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 8:06 pm
Disruptors are also fairly common, but Cardassians were frequently stated to use phaser technology, the Romulans use it as well. (Section 31 using Bashir to try to get that head of the Tal Shiar to walk past a "phaser relay" and irradiate him, on Romulus.) A LOT of generic one-time races used phasers. Neither phasers nor disruptors were rare technology, they seemed fairly basic, the Klingons/Romulans/Federation have probably just refined their fielded versions of the weapons far beyond what smaller powers have.
At any rate, given what Starfleet has proved capable of doing engineering-wise, I don't believe it would be any daunting task to design a working disruptor. In fact I'd be shocked if they didn't have hundreds of schematics for different kinds of disruptors laying around after centuries of intermittent conflict with the Klingons and Romulans.
At any rate, given what Starfleet has proved capable of doing engineering-wise, I don't believe it would be any daunting task to design a working disruptor. In fact I'd be shocked if they didn't have hundreds of schematics for different kinds of disruptors laying around after centuries of intermittent conflict with the Klingons and Romulans.
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15368
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Maybe there is some problem putting different weapons on one ship. Enery conversion or something which you need only do once normally you'd have to do multiple times.
That and it seems disruptors are larger for the same amount of kick.
That and it seems disruptors are larger for the same amount of kick.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.