Baywatch Trailer (2017)

From 2001 to Invasion of the Body Snatchers
Post Reply
User avatar
Nutso
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9637
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 9:58 pm

Baywatch Trailer (2017)

Post by Nutso »



Starring Dwayne Johnson, Zac Efron, Alexandra Daddario, Priyanka Chopra
"Bible, Wrath of Khan, what's the difference?"
Stan - South Park
RK_Striker_JK_5
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 13003
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: New Hampshire
Contact:

Re: Baywatch Trailer (2017)

Post by RK_Striker_JK_5 »

Well, that was... a thing.
User avatar
Nutso
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9637
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 9:58 pm

Re: Baywatch Trailer (2017)

Post by Nutso »

I only heard about this yesterday. It's actually happening...
"Bible, Wrath of Khan, what's the difference?"
Stan - South Park
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15368
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Baywatch Trailer (2017)

Post by Teaos »

But... Why?
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Baywatch Trailer (2017)

Post by Mikey »

Teaos wrote:But... Why?
Some things mankind was not meant to know.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Captain Picard's Hair
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 4042
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:58 am
Location: Right here.

Re: Baywatch Trailer (2017)

Post by Captain Picard's Hair »

Mikey wrote:
Teaos wrote:But... Why?
Some things mankind was not meant to know.
There do seem easier (and more direct) ways to distribute softcore porn - if that could be distinguished from half the ad billboards in any Western city nowadays. It's particularly self-defeating here since the promotional materials give away the game for free. On the plus side, whatever deficiencies there are sure to be in the sparse plot won't really matter.
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wonderous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross... but it's not for the timid." Q, Q Who
User avatar
Nutso
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9637
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 9:58 pm

Re: Baywatch Trailer (2017)

Post by Nutso »

Teaos wrote:But... Why?
Nostalgia is big money. The stuff the current 30-42 year olds grew up on is being made into movies. Plus The Rock is in this. And current big tit champ Alexandra Daddario.

Transformers was the ultimate example of that. In the next decade I expect "Ben 10" to be made into a live-action movie. Or maybe Pokemon because that thing has Star Wars potential as far as merchandising goes. So many Pokemon to sell... "Gotta catch 'em all!" What a fucking amazing marketing slogan.
"Bible, Wrath of Khan, what's the difference?"
Stan - South Park
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Baywatch Trailer (2017)

Post by Graham Kennedy »

I find myself disappointed at the knowing meta jokes about running in slow motion.

Baywatch was a giant cheeseball of a show that took itself very seriously. That's what made it so much fun to watch!

This trailer displeases me.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
RK_Striker_JK_5
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 13003
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: New Hampshire
Contact:

Re: Baywatch Trailer (2017)

Post by RK_Striker_JK_5 »

Nutso wrote:
Teaos wrote:But... Why?
Nostalgia is big money. The stuff the current 30-42 year olds grew up on is being made into movies. Plus The Rock is in this. And current big tit champ Alexandra Daddario.

Transformers was the ultimate example of that. In the next decade I expect "Ben 10" to be made into a live-action movie. Or maybe Pokemon because that thing has Star Wars potential as far as merchandising goes. So many Pokemon to sell... "Gotta catch 'em all!" What a fucking amazing marketing slogan.
I actually recall a Ben 10 live-action movie made for Cartoon Network.
User avatar
Nutso
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9637
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 9:58 pm

Re: Baywatch Trailer (2017)

Post by Nutso »

Graham Kennedy wrote:I find myself disappointed at the knowing meta jokes about running in slow motion.

Baywatch was a giant cheeseball of a show that took itself very seriously. That's what made it so much fun to watch!

This trailer displeases me.
Would it be better if Will Ferrel was the lead?
"Bible, Wrath of Khan, what's the difference?"
Stan - South Park
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Baywatch Trailer (2017)

Post by Graham Kennedy »

Honestly I can't think of any guy that could do a Hasslehoff today.

The ladies are easy. Pretty girls with big breasts running in swimsuits, easy.

But a guy who is sufficiently hunky, and serious about what he's doing, whilst being vaguely ridiculous? Modern movies can't seem to stop themselves winking at anything that's ridiculous. They're so desperate to let the audience know that it's not really bad, it's written that way on purpose, it's supposed to be funny see!

Meh. Make something that's supposed to be good and have it turn out goofy and silly but still sexy and fun to watch. That's the tone of Baywatch, at least to my eyes.

My favourite Baywatch anecdote? The producers were auditioning actresses for CJ, and not having a good time of it. When Pamela auditioned they liked her a lot. One of them put it to her that the show was supposed to be very sexy, and that she would spend an awful lot of the time with her considerable assets on display in swimsuits and low cut outfits, and was she okay with that?

Her response? "I'd do the whole show stark naked if I thought you'd let me." :)
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Post Reply