Jurassic World

From 2001 to Invasion of the Body Snatchers
User avatar
Griffin
Commander
Commander
Posts: 1209
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 7:52 pm
Location: Yorkshire!

Jurassic World

Post by Griffin »

Well. They've released an ad for the trailer.
Link

I'm cautiously optimistic, but the lack of the any of the original characters, John Williams, and Micheal Crichton. Though I will concede that Giacchino is pretty good and he does seem to be bringing in the original melodies.

Though I just don't understand why they'd be allowed to breed carnivores again, I mean Isla Sorna has a naval cordon around it per Lost World doesn't it? And there's the whole San Diego incident. And how did they get the DNA, did they start from scratch again with more preserved mosquitos? Did they acquire Ingen's research or has Ingen become "unbankrupt"I know it's just a trailer but I hope they bring thse things up in the film.

Also, the CGI looks a bit off, but hopefully that's just because it's the trailer for the trailer.
Bite my shiny metal ass
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Jurassic World

Post by Mikey »

IDK, the first one went off the rails away from the intent of the novel badly enough, and that was with Crichton's help.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Jurassic World

Post by Graham Kennedy »

Meh. I never much cared for Crichton's philosophy/politics, so I didn't mind that the films largely ignored it.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Jurassic World

Post by Mikey »

Graham Kennedy wrote:Meh. I never much cared for Crichton's philosophy/politics, so I didn't mind that the films largely ignored it.
The problem I had with the divergence from the novel is that a film based on that novel automatically purports to be about mathematical philosophy and the "science" bit of science fiction. Instead, we got a shoot-em-up with dinosaurs.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Jurassic World

Post by Graham Kennedy »

I guess I'm a bit of a hypocrite on the whole book to movie thing. If it's a book I've read and care about, then deviating from it bothers me. If not, then not. I don't really care that they ignored what Crighton was talking about... but Starship Troopers drives me into conniptions. :)
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6244
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: Jurassic World

Post by McAvoy »

Ehh I liked Starship Troopers for what it is. A fun shooter upper, explosions, and carnage with some boobs on the side.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Jurassic World

Post by Mikey »

To me the film treatments of Jurassic Park and Starship Troopers compared to the source novels are one and the same.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Griffin
Commander
Commander
Posts: 1209
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 7:52 pm
Location: Yorkshire!

Re: Jurassic World

Post by Griffin »

Mikey wrote:IDK, the first one went off the rails away from the intent of the novel badly enough, and that was with Crichton's help.
Graham Kennedy wrote:Meh. I never much cared for Crichton's philosophy/politics, so I didn't mind that the films largely ignored it.
Fair enough.
Bite my shiny metal ass
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Jurassic World

Post by Graham Kennedy »

McAvoy wrote:Ehh I liked Starship Troopers for what it is. A fun shooter upper, explosions, and carnage with some boobs on the side.
I have a kind of love-hate relationship with the film. I'd be right there with you, if only it hadn't been called "Starship Troopers". Call it "The Bug War" or something instead and change the names and a couple of scenes, and you'd never know it was based on the book. I'd like it a LOT more in that case, for the reasons you state.

But every time I watch it, I just find myself wishing they'd made a film of the book instead. I love that book!
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6244
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: Jurassic World

Post by McAvoy »

Eventually they will I think.

Everything gets a second chance in Hollywood especially something big budgeted.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Jurassic World

Post by Graham Kennedy »

There is a remake of ST in the works. I hope it's more like the book.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
User avatar
sunnyside
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2711
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 5:35 pm

Re: Jurassic World

Post by sunnyside »

Mikey wrote:IDK, the first one went off the rails away from the intent of the novel badly enough, and that was with Crichton's help.
I read the book (though as a rather young lad) and while I was aware that the movie left out many things, I could quite apprecite them editing the thing down instead of making a three and a half hour monstrosity where pretty much every critic would say it was too long ask if it's really reasonable that they'd decide to attack the raptor nest.

What is the "point" that you think was left out in the movie?
User avatar
Nutso
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9637
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 9:58 pm

Re: Jurassic World

Post by Nutso »

Err...Official Trailer

Why are they creating a hybrid dinosaur? What is a hybrid dinosaur?
"Bible, Wrath of Khan, what's the difference?"
Stan - South Park
User avatar
Griffin
Commander
Commander
Posts: 1209
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 7:52 pm
Location: Yorkshire!

Re: Jurassic World

Post by Griffin »

1) Not keen on the music
2) The river scene with the boats. Seriously? Everyone remember what happened when the stegosaurus were disturbed in JP2? Seems far too dangerous to allow that type of adventure.
3) I'm not keen on the idea of this new genetically engineered super monster. It smacks of b-movie explicitly evil monster, rather than hungry predator. That being said it is the logical OOU follow on, and matches the modifications in the first novel. kind of.
4) That motorbike scene better be an adaption of one of the few novel scenes not made to film from the second book. Because the idea they seem to be suggesting of a pack of tame Raptors is frankly ridiculous.
Bite my shiny metal ass
User avatar
Jim
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1907
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:32 pm
Location: Pittsburgh
Contact:

Re: Jurassic World

Post by Jim »

It is probably a raptor the size of a Rex. Or a mix with that stinosaurus or whatever it was in #3.
Ugh... do not thump the Book of G'Quan...
Post Reply