Faults of The Sisko

Deep Space Nine
Atekimogus
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 1193
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:10 pm
Location: Vienna

Re: Faults of The Sisko

Post by Atekimogus »

Captain Seafort wrote: We don't know what they were using in TWoK, because we never saw a shielded ship hit. We do, however, know that the shields weren't the ships' only defences - part of yellow alert procedures involved activating "defence fields", which could be much more strongly argued to operate on a similar principle to the NX's polarised hull based on the bridge display of it activating.
Very good point actually, hadn't remembered that.
I'm Commander Shepard and this is my favorite store on the Citadel.
SolkaTruesilver
Commander
Commander
Posts: 1406
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 2:49 am

Re: Faults of The Sisko

Post by SolkaTruesilver »

Atekimogus wrote:
Captain Seafort wrote: We don't know what they were using in TWoK, because we never saw a shielded ship hit. We do, however, know that the shields weren't the ships' only defences - part of yellow alert procedures involved activating "defence fields", which could be much more strongly argued to operate on a similar principle to the NX's polarised hull based on the bridge display of it activating.
Very good point actually, hadn't remembered that.
My Trek-fu is very weak. I can't remember when this is mentioned in the movie... Although Memory Alpha does back up your claim.


So, how about that Sisko's, eh? :laughroll:
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Faults of The Sisko

Post by Mark »

Strictly non cannon, I seem to remember reading in some tech manual or other that those yellow alert defensive fields are to protect the bridge from transporter beams.

However, it seems redundant to me. When Starfleet developed shields that were infinitely more effective that "polarizing the hull plating" it doesn't seem nessessary to incorporate that system anymore. Plus, that system seems to have a limited effectiveness and "modern" weapons unaffected by it (after all, would you don a set of leather armor under your flak jacket if you were storming a machine gun nest?)
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Faults of The Sisko

Post by Mikey »

A flak jacket wouldn't have helped in storming a machine-gun nest anyway. But, I see your point. It does seem like a useless redundancy amidst an engineering philosophy that tends to shun all possible useful redundancies. It is, as you say, non-canon, so it was likely just an individual author thinking some idea was kind of "neat."
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Faults of The Sisko

Post by Mark »

It makes perfect sense to me actually.....at condition green an enemy ship could swoop in, beam away the entire bridge crew and guarantee a first strike that would likely cripple the ship. Those transporter screens at Yellow Alert make sense....non provocative but protects the command crew.

By TOS and TNG I'd imagine you could polarize the hull plating all day long, and it wouldn't do a damned thing against a QT or modern phasers.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
alexmann
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 912
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 6:52 pm
Location: I'm in your mind!

Re: Faults of The Sisko

Post by alexmann »

But it would help prevent beaming.
ImageImage
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Faults of The Sisko

Post by Mark »

Sorry, should have been clearer. Polarizing the hull doesn't do a damned thing to prevent beaming as we've seen. Those "screens" as they are labeled on ST:II are something else.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
alexmann
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 912
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 6:52 pm
Location: I'm in your mind!

Re: Faults of The Sisko

Post by alexmann »

OK.
ImageImage
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6244
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: Faults of The Sisko

Post by McAvoy »

I just finished doing a marathon of ENT (minus These are the Voyages :wink:). I noticed in Season 4 Divergence that the Enterprise is protected by some blue energy field when hit.

Image

Image

Probably a VFX error since we never seen this before.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
alexmann
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 912
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 6:52 pm
Location: I'm in your mind!

Re: Faults of The Sisko

Post by alexmann »

I think we do. The polarised plating is blue when hit.
ImageImage
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6244
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: Faults of The Sisko

Post by McAvoy »

It is? I never noticed it until now. I always thought there was no reaction by the polorized hull plating when hit unlike shielded hits.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Faults of The Sisko

Post by Mikey »

Are you sure that's flare from an impact? Tough to say from those shots... it could be impulse flare. Remember, the NX-01 had blue impulse exhaust.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6244
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: Faults of The Sisko

Post by McAvoy »

Definitely. I took those stills.

Image

As you can see blue flareup from the impact.

Image

Enterprise flies underneath the battlecruiser to protect the planet and the whole ship lights up from the impacts.

Interestingly, when I looked for better pictures of this, I noticed prior to these two shots, Enterprise was taking fire and there were no blue flareups.

Also alex, I checked a few early episodes and so far no blue impact flareups.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Faults of The Sisko

Post by Captain Seafort »

McAvoy wrote:I checked a few early episodes and so far no blue impact flareups.
Interesting. Have you checked any other S4 episodes? She might have been equipped with a beefed-up SIF to support the hull plating in the post-Xindi refit.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6244
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: Faults of The Sisko

Post by McAvoy »

The Awakening is the earliest episode this shows up. The Augment arc doesn't show any blue flareups.

Image

This is the best shot I could find. It isn't as pronounced as later on but still there.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
Post Reply