Very good point actually, hadn't remembered that.Captain Seafort wrote: We don't know what they were using in TWoK, because we never saw a shielded ship hit. We do, however, know that the shields weren't the ships' only defences - part of yellow alert procedures involved activating "defence fields", which could be much more strongly argued to operate on a similar principle to the NX's polarised hull based on the bridge display of it activating.
Faults of The Sisko
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 1193
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:10 pm
- Location: Vienna
Re: Faults of The Sisko
I'm Commander Shepard and this is my favorite store on the Citadel.
-
- Commander
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 2:49 am
Re: Faults of The Sisko
My Trek-fu is very weak. I can't remember when this is mentioned in the movie... Although Memory Alpha does back up your claim.Atekimogus wrote:Very good point actually, hadn't remembered that.Captain Seafort wrote: We don't know what they were using in TWoK, because we never saw a shielded ship hit. We do, however, know that the shields weren't the ships' only defences - part of yellow alert procedures involved activating "defence fields", which could be much more strongly argued to operate on a similar principle to the NX's polarised hull based on the bridge display of it activating.
So, how about that Sisko's, eh?
Re: Faults of The Sisko
Strictly non cannon, I seem to remember reading in some tech manual or other that those yellow alert defensive fields are to protect the bridge from transporter beams.
However, it seems redundant to me. When Starfleet developed shields that were infinitely more effective that "polarizing the hull plating" it doesn't seem nessessary to incorporate that system anymore. Plus, that system seems to have a limited effectiveness and "modern" weapons unaffected by it (after all, would you don a set of leather armor under your flak jacket if you were storming a machine gun nest?)
However, it seems redundant to me. When Starfleet developed shields that were infinitely more effective that "polarizing the hull plating" it doesn't seem nessessary to incorporate that system anymore. Plus, that system seems to have a limited effectiveness and "modern" weapons unaffected by it (after all, would you don a set of leather armor under your flak jacket if you were storming a machine gun nest?)
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Faults of The Sisko
A flak jacket wouldn't have helped in storming a machine-gun nest anyway. But, I see your point. It does seem like a useless redundancy amidst an engineering philosophy that tends to shun all possible useful redundancies. It is, as you say, non-canon, so it was likely just an individual author thinking some idea was kind of "neat."
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Re: Faults of The Sisko
It makes perfect sense to me actually.....at condition green an enemy ship could swoop in, beam away the entire bridge crew and guarantee a first strike that would likely cripple the ship. Those transporter screens at Yellow Alert make sense....non provocative but protects the command crew.
By TOS and TNG I'd imagine you could polarize the hull plating all day long, and it wouldn't do a damned thing against a QT or modern phasers.
By TOS and TNG I'd imagine you could polarize the hull plating all day long, and it wouldn't do a damned thing against a QT or modern phasers.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 6:52 pm
- Location: I'm in your mind!
Re: Faults of The Sisko
But it would help prevent beaming.
Re: Faults of The Sisko
Sorry, should have been clearer. Polarizing the hull doesn't do a damned thing to prevent beaming as we've seen. Those "screens" as they are labeled on ST:II are something else.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
Re: Faults of The Sisko
I just finished doing a marathon of ENT (minus These are the Voyages ). I noticed in Season 4 Divergence that the Enterprise is protected by some blue energy field when hit.
Probably a VFX error since we never seen this before.
Probably a VFX error since we never seen this before.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 6:52 pm
- Location: I'm in your mind!
Re: Faults of The Sisko
I think we do. The polarised plating is blue when hit.
Re: Faults of The Sisko
It is? I never noticed it until now. I always thought there was no reaction by the polorized hull plating when hit unlike shielded hits.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Faults of The Sisko
Are you sure that's flare from an impact? Tough to say from those shots... it could be impulse flare. Remember, the NX-01 had blue impulse exhaust.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Re: Faults of The Sisko
Definitely. I took those stills.
As you can see blue flareup from the impact.
Enterprise flies underneath the battlecruiser to protect the planet and the whole ship lights up from the impacts.
Interestingly, when I looked for better pictures of this, I noticed prior to these two shots, Enterprise was taking fire and there were no blue flareups.
Also alex, I checked a few early episodes and so far no blue impact flareups.
As you can see blue flareup from the impact.
Enterprise flies underneath the battlecruiser to protect the planet and the whole ship lights up from the impacts.
Interestingly, when I looked for better pictures of this, I noticed prior to these two shots, Enterprise was taking fire and there were no blue flareups.
Also alex, I checked a few early episodes and so far no blue impact flareups.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Faults of The Sisko
Interesting. Have you checked any other S4 episodes? She might have been equipped with a beefed-up SIF to support the hull plating in the post-Xindi refit.McAvoy wrote:I checked a few early episodes and so far no blue impact flareups.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Re: Faults of The Sisko
The Awakening is the earliest episode this shows up. The Augment arc doesn't show any blue flareups.
This is the best shot I could find. It isn't as pronounced as later on but still there.
This is the best shot I could find. It isn't as pronounced as later on but still there.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"