SF Debris: Of Holograms and Ethics

The Next Generation
Post Reply
User avatar
Nutso
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9615
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 9:58 pm

SF Debris: Of Holograms and Ethics

Post by Nutso »

http://blip.tv/sf-debris-opinionated-re ... cs-6632408
A look at the nature of holographic characters and how it could relate to ethical concerns about AI.
"Bible, Wrath of Khan, what's the difference?"
Stan - South Park
Tyyr
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10654
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh

Re: SF Debris: Of Holograms and Ethics

Post by Tyyr »

The holodecks and ESPECIALLY characters like Moriarty and the Doctor bring up all kinds of ethical questions that Trek has been side stepping for decades.
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: SF Debris: Of Holograms and Ethics

Post by Graham Kennedy »

The thing that always amuses me about holodeck characters is that the hologram part really isn't the important thing - it's just an avatar, an interface. If you fall in love with a hologram, you're not actually in love with the hologram... you're in love with the ship's computer.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6225
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: SF Debris: Of Holograms and Ethics

Post by McAvoy »

GrahamKennedy wrote:The thing that always amuses me about holodeck characters is that the hologram part really isn't the important thing - it's just an avatar, an interface. If you fall in love with a hologram, you're not actually in love with the hologram... you're in love with the ship's computer.
Maybe not the ships computer but the programming for that avatar.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: SF Debris: Of Holograms and Ethics

Post by Graham Kennedy »

Pretty much the same thing, really.

"Writes invoke technobabble to avoid it" aside, there's absolutely no reason in theory why they couldn't simply run, say, Leah Brahms's holopersonality and use it as the standard interface with the ship's computer - exactly as we saw them doing on Andromeda.

In fact they even did just that in the TOS episode where Kirk's computer was flirting with him and got upset when he threatened it.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
RK_Striker_JK_5
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 12986
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: New Hampshire
Contact:

Re: SF Debris: Of Holograms and Ethics

Post by RK_Striker_JK_5 »

"Computed, dear." :( :lol:

Would a personality be more efficient than the standard interface?
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: SF Debris: Of Holograms and Ethics

Post by Graham Kennedy »

No idea, really. Geordi's experience in Booby Trap would certainly indicate that it could be useful.

And after all, the ship has ALL of these personalities stored in it. So the ship personality would be incredibly knowledgeable about pretty much anything and everything. I mean, even assuming it could only run one given set of skills at a time for some reason, there's no reason your ship avatar couldn't flip between, say, an EMH level of medical knowledge when Beverly is chatting with it in medbay, and then a Leah Brahms level of engineering knowledge when Geordi needs it. Throw in an equivalent tactical genius, scientific genius, etc. It could potentially be an amazing asset for the ship.

But of course that goes to the real reason the writers don't want to go down that road. Because if your ship can do all that, if it's really a sentient being combined with all the advantages of speed and an immense and perfect memory and all that... then of course you eventually arrive at the question of why it actually needs a crew aboard at all.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Tyyr
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10654
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh

Re: SF Debris: Of Holograms and Ethics

Post by Tyyr »

I dunno about it being more efficient, but it could "humanize" things for the crew depending on their preferences.
Post Reply