Page 2 of 3
Re: SFDebris : Ensign Ro
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 4:11 am
by Tsukiyumi
Deepcrush wrote:False flirting doesn't count as bedding. Neither does out conning the conning lady of the episode. Sex requires sex to be counted as sex.
He
definitely slept with mirror Dax; I remember that. As for Intendant Kira, I don't recall.
Re: SFDebris : Ensign Ro
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 5:52 am
by Deepcrush
Mirror Sisko or The Sisko? Which one slept with who.
Re: SFDebris : Ensign Ro
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 8:56 am
by Tsukiyumi
The Sisko slept with mirror Dax.
Re: SFDebris : Ensign Ro
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 1:40 pm
by Deepcrush
Going to have to look up that episode and see.
Re: SFDebris : Ensign Ro
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 6:20 pm
by SolkaTruesilver
Remember that Mirror-Jadzia (NOT Dax, I think) slapped Sisko when she saw him in "Shattered Mirror" saying that she owed him that for making love to her under false pretense.
So we have official confirmation.
Re: SFDebris : Ensign Ro
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 8:56 pm
by RK_Striker_JK_5
So he got some nookie.
Re: SFDebris : Ensign Ro
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:13 am
by Deepcrush
SolkaTruesilver wrote:Remember that Mirror-Jadzia (NOT Dax, I think) slapped Sisko when she saw him in "Shattered Mirror" saying that she owed him that for making love to her under false pretense.
So we have official confirmation.
Hardly official since the whole point is that we can't remember the details.
Re: SFDebris : Ensign Ro
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 2:47 pm
by SolkaTruesilver
Deepcrush wrote:SolkaTruesilver wrote:Remember that Mirror-Jadzia (NOT Dax, I think) slapped Sisko when she saw him in "Shattered Mirror" saying that she owed him that for making love to her under false pretense.
So we have official confirmation.
Hardly official since the whole point is that we can't remember the details.
You can't. I can.
He slept with her. She confirmed it the next time we saw her.
What I can't confirm is if they actually call her "Dax", meaning, if Mirror-Jadzia was joined or not.
Re: SFDebris : Ensign Ro
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 1:43 am
by Deepcrush
That's still not confermation, that's your opinion. Confermation requires proof.
Re: SFDebris : Ensign Ro
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 4:29 am
by Sonic Glitch
Deepcrush wrote:That's still not confermation, that's your opinion. Confermation requires proof.
And confirmation requires an "I."
Re: SFDebris : Ensign Ro
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 12:21 pm
by Deepcrush
It would be easier if I'd have worn my glasses and not been typing on my iPod.
Re: SFDebris : Ensign Ro
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 3:21 pm
by SolkaTruesilver
Deepcrush wrote:That's still not confermation, that's your opinion. Confermation requires proof.
That's my opinion that I remember the whole freaking line? (and Sisko's great comeback)
*Slap*
Jadzia: "That's for making love to me under false pretense. I was suspicious of you from the start!"
Sisko: "You hid it well"
I think she even pulled a knife at him after that line
Do a freaking research, you'd stop wasting everyone time arguing over such a petty detail.
Re: SFDebris : Ensign Ro
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:25 pm
by Deepcrush
Your opinion or your promise that your opinion is absolute is meaningless. If you want to make a claim, then its YOUR job to do the research and show the results. If you can't handle it then leave the forum and try elementary school over again. You're here so you need to expect that people will call you on your mistakes.
Re: SFDebris : Ensign Ro
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:30 pm
by Captain Seafort
Oh FFS...
DEEP SPACE NINE: "Shattered Mirror" - REV. 2/15/96 - ACT THREE 26.
28 CONTINUED:
DAX
That's for making love to me under
false pretenses. I was suspicious
of you from the start.
SISKO
You hid it well.
DAX
(a warning)
If you ever try to touch me
again...
Dax whips out a long, curved dagger. DAX
Get my point?
SISKO
(re: knife)
I hope not.
Deep, stop nit-picking - he referenced the specific episode and described the scene in question. Solka when someone demands evidence, however nit-picky, for a claim you made it's your job to stump up the evidence, not theirs.
Re: SFDebris : Ensign Ro
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:34 pm
by Deepcrush
Captain Seafort wrote:Deep, stop nit-picking - he referenced the specific episode and described the scene in question. Solka when someone demands evidence, however nit-picky, for a claim you made it's your job to stump up the evidence, not theirs.
Seafort, read first. I didn't make the claim on the situation, I questioned it.