What's the most improbable aspect of the Trek universe?
Re: What's the most improbable aspect of the Trek universe?
I was under the impression that it was First Contact that had everyone singing kumbayah, not the aftermath of the war. In the movie First Contact it looked like earth was full of independent communities hanging on by the finger nails. Although it has been years since I've seen it.
God is great, beer is good, and people are crazy.
.................................................Billy Currington
.................................................Billy Currington
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: What's the most improbable aspect of the Trek universe?
Agreed. In FC, the post-WW3 populace was more tribal, fragmented, and xenophobic than ever.Vic wrote:I was under the impression that it was First Contact that had everyone singing kumbayah, not the aftermath of the war. In the movie First Contact it looked like earth was full of independent communities hanging on by the finger nails. Although it has been years since I've seen it.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- The piman
- Chief petty officer
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 8:33 pm
- Location: the space between spaces
Re: What's the most improbable aspect of the Trek universe?
perhaps WW3 was so bad that people were like "hey let's all get together and we'll be fine". then because of this, a society was created were ideas could be easily expressed, violence was unheard of, and people wanted to experiment with new ideas and advancements in technology. but then there were also people that wanted to stay separated from others for whatever reason, thereby creating the whole fragmentation thing.
Be excellent to one another...
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: What's the most improbable aspect of the Trek universe?
Sounds like 1919, and given how well that turned out I'm somewhat sceptical.The piman wrote:perhaps WW3 was so bad that people were like "hey let's all get together and we'll be fine". then because of this, a society was created were ideas could be easily expressed, violence was unheard of, and people wanted to experiment with new ideas and advancements in technology. but then there were also people that wanted to stay separated from others for whatever reason, thereby creating the whole fragmentation thing.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: What's the most improbable aspect of the Trek universe?
I think it's worth pointing out that it's not after WW3, but after TOS that humans begin to seriously change. In TOS and the later movie era, humans are much the same as they are now. They think, act and behave in the same ways we do now. It's only in TNG that we see humans becoming incredibly pacifistic and beginning to lose IQ points.
My own theory is that, due to the collapse of the Klingon Empire as a credible military threat, the UFP became increasingly complacent - believing that its technological advantages over its neighbouring races would be enough to ensure there'd be no major conflicts. With no threat to keep the populace worried, the more beligerant governments of the TOS/movie era were voted out of power, and replaced by far more pacifistic leaders. As the UFP's tech advanced further and further, bringing things like holodecks and replicators into the hands of the public, society underwent a major shift towards what we see in TNG. With all these major shifts in the civillian populace, the military's more beligerant leaders were eventualy retired and replaced with admirals chosen more for their ideology instead of their military prowess. This combined with the apparent lack of any real external threat caused Starfleet's shift to a science and exploration based organisation, which viewed warfare as a secondary concern which was unlikely to happen.
My own theory is that, due to the collapse of the Klingon Empire as a credible military threat, the UFP became increasingly complacent - believing that its technological advantages over its neighbouring races would be enough to ensure there'd be no major conflicts. With no threat to keep the populace worried, the more beligerant governments of the TOS/movie era were voted out of power, and replaced by far more pacifistic leaders. As the UFP's tech advanced further and further, bringing things like holodecks and replicators into the hands of the public, society underwent a major shift towards what we see in TNG. With all these major shifts in the civillian populace, the military's more beligerant leaders were eventualy retired and replaced with admirals chosen more for their ideology instead of their military prowess. This combined with the apparent lack of any real external threat caused Starfleet's shift to a science and exploration based organisation, which viewed warfare as a secondary concern which was unlikely to happen.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 13002
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact:
Re: What's the most improbable aspect of the Trek universe?
Sionnach Glic wrote:I think it's worth pointing out that it's not after WW3, but after TOS that humans begin to seriously change. In TOS and the later movie era, humans are much the same as they are now. They think, act and behave in the same ways we do now. It's only in TNG that we see humans becoming incredibly pacifistic and beginning to lose IQ points.
My own theory is that, due to the collapse of the Klingon Empire as a credible military threat, the UFP became increasingly complacent - believing that its technological advantages over its neighbouring races would be enough to ensure there'd be no major conflicts. With no threat to keep the populace worried, the more beligerant governments of the TOS/movie era were voted out of power, and replaced by far more pacifistic leaders. As the UFP's tech advanced further and further, bringing things like holodecks and replicators into the hands of the public, society underwent a major shift towards what we see in TNG. With all these major shifts in the civillian populace, the military's more beligerant leaders were eventualy retired and replaced with admirals chosen more for their ideology instead of their military prowess. This combined with the apparent lack of any real external threat caused Starfleet's shift to a science and exploration based organisation, which viewed warfare as a secondary concern which was unlikely to happen.
That's what a lot of people think, actually. It makes a lot of sense to me, at least.
- The piman
- Chief petty officer
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 8:33 pm
- Location: the space between spaces
Re: What's the most improbable aspect of the Trek universe?
so, was it because of these "pacifist" leaders that people became nicer and decided to throw out money altogether on Earth? obviously, money would still need to be used among other peoples in the galaxy hence the gold pressed latinum.
Be excellent to one another...
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: What's the most improbable aspect of the Trek universe?
I don't think any of that speaks to the form of economy in use. Rather, as has been seen, the "no money" idea was in use within the UFP specifically while currency was used in transactions with non-UFP species. I'd guess that the no-money deal came about with the advent of widespread replication technology, along with other high-tech means of food propduction/necessity production. In TOS - at which point replicators were not widespread - money of a sort was used even on UFP bases (cf. TOS: "The Trouble With Tribbles," et. al.)
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: What's the most improbable aspect of the Trek universe?
You'd still need some method of defining the cost producing something from a replicator, albeit with labour coast removed from the equation. You still need base materials and power, neither of which are infinite.Mikey wrote:I'd guess that the no-money deal came about with the advent of widespread replication technology, along with other high-tech means of food propduction/necessity production.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10654
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
- Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh
Re: What's the most improbable aspect of the Trek universe?
Exactly. The energy requirements of replicating something would be substantial, and energy isn't free.
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: What's the most improbable aspect of the Trek universe?
We've no idea what the energy requirements would be, only that they're non-zero, and that's all we need to know.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10654
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
- Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh
Re: What's the most improbable aspect of the Trek universe?
At the very least you're going to be breaking a significant number of molecular bonds. If you have to carry feedstock that is incredibly close to the final product than you're not getting a huge benefit from replicator technology.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: What's the most improbable aspect of the Trek universe?
True... but the fact remains of a no-money economy, at least within the Federation. Given that, the advent of widespread replicator usage seems the most likely fulcrum on which to lever such a thing.Captain Seafort wrote:You'd still need some method of defining the cost producing something from a replicator, albeit with labour coast removed from the equation. You still need base materials and power, neither of which are infinite.Mikey wrote:I'd guess that the no-money deal came about with the advent of widespread replication technology, along with other high-tech means of food propduction/necessity production.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: What's the most improbable aspect of the Trek universe?
Or communism, which has the elimination of money as one of its key goals.Mikey wrote:True... but the fact remains of a no-money economy, at least within the Federation. Given that, the advent of widespread replicator usage seems the most likely fulcrum on which to lever such a thing.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: What's the most improbable aspect of the Trek universe?
Strictly speaking, communism is a political definition rather than an economic one. However, without getting into a semantic morass, you may be right except for the fact that what we've seen doesn't appear to be communism. Currency is seemingly readily available to individuals to trade with non-Fed species. There is obvious private ownership of land. There are certainly no manpower quotas or restrictions on any given profession or vocation, though this could still be explained under communism by... the widespread usage of replicators.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer