Picards mistakes

The Next Generation
Post Reply
User avatar
kostmayer
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2812
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 11:08 am

Picards mistakes

Post by kostmayer »

Following on from the thread in Voyager, what would be the worst mistakes Picard made during his command - anyone remember the scene in Tapestry where he is confronted by all the people he 'killed'?

A couple off the top of my head :-

Not turning back to Federation Space when Q flung them across the Galaxy into Borg space, thus resulting in 18 people being killed.

Allowing Dr Crusher to remain at the site of a bombing in The High Ground, thus losing crewmembers in the ensuing hostage situation.
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15368
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Post by Teaos »

You can hardly blame Picard for the Borg incounter. He had no way of knowing what might happen.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
User avatar
kostmayer
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2812
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 11:08 am

Post by kostmayer »

Maybe not, but he was warned by Guinan.
User avatar
Cyd
Petty officer second class
Petty officer second class
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 4:01 am

Post by Cyd »

It probably didn't matter what he did; because the event was organized by Q they would inevidably encountered the Borg.
Monroe
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 5837
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:17 am

Post by Monroe »

Not getting married and having children?
Bam! I win.
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Personally, I don't hold Picard in the same way I hold people like Janeway. Most of Picards mistakes were just accidents, and usually he put them right. Of course, he naturally has a few marks against him, but I think saving the Earth on several ocasions makes up for it.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Post by Graham Kennedy »

I would contrast two decisions he made - namely "Homeward" and "Pen Pals". In the first, Picard was willing to let an entire civilisation die because of the prime directive. In the second, he saved an entire civilisation in defiance of the prime directive. And from what I can tell, the only real difference between the two cases was that in Pen Pals he actually heard one of the natives pleading for help.

I can see that you can argue that it's a Starfleet officer's job to uphold the prime directive at all costs. And I can see that you can argue that a moral person must occasionally violate the prime directive in order to be true to his own principles. But in doing one thing sometimes and another thing at other times, Picard becomes a hypocrite.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Personally, I hope Picard's views on the Prime Directive were changed after 'Pen Pals'. How anyone could stand by and let billions of innocent people die is beyond me.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Post by Captain Seafort »

I wouldn't call Picard's decision to let the Boraalans die hypocracy, given that he probably got a severe dressing-down for the "Pen Pals" incident. Boardering on genocide, yes, but that's the Prime Directive for you. What does come across as hypocracy is this:
Picard wrote:This is one of the times when we must face the ramifications of the Prime Directive... and honor the lives we cannot save.
The sheer arrogance of pretending that lives can't be saved, when the deaths are a direct result of his refusal to intervene, is staggering. If it was a case of the Enterprise busting a gut to gave the Boraalans and failing, fine, "honour the lives the cannot save". But they didn't. They abandoned them to die to uphold their precious law. If Picard hasn't got the spine to put the Boraalans lives above the Prime Directive, fine, but he should be hanging his head in shame, not bragging about it.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Post by Graham Kennedy »

The idea that he got told off and so changed his views would work... except that in "A Matter of Time", which comes after Pen Pals, he specifically uses his violations of the prime directive to try and convince Rasmussen to violate the temporal version of the same. If he'd come to believe that you had to uphold such things, he'd still be a hypocrite.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Post by Captain Seafort »

GrahamKennedy wrote:The idea that he got told off and so changed his views would work... except that in "A Matter of Time", which comes after Pen Pals, he specifically uses his violations of the prime directive to try and convince Rasmussen to violate the temporal version of the same. If he'd come to believe that you had to uphold such things, he'd still by a hypocrite.
I wouldn't say he changed his views, simply that he'd lost whatever spine he had with regards to ignoring the Prime Directive. The incident with Rasmussen certainly counts as hypocracy since he is apparently no longer willing to violate the PD despite his past record.

Probably the worst incident involving Picard and the PD was his using it as an excuse for putting the desire of a bunch of selfish luddites to stay put above the prospect of vastly improved medical care for billions of Federation citizens. So much for "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few...or the one".
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15368
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Post by Teaos »

I don't blame him for not helping. It's nature at work. And I'm not talking about some wise demi god who decides what lives and dies but sometimes it is just their time to go.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Post by Captain Seafort »

Teaos wrote:I don't blame him for not helping. It's nature at work. And I'm not talking about some wise demi god who decides what lives and dies but sometimes it is just their time to go.
It's nature at work whenever there's a volcanic eruption, or an earthquake. Take the Boxing Day tsunami in 2004 - the Feds would have done nothing to help. Or Rwanda, or Kosovo, or Darfur for that matter.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15368
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Post by Teaos »

Your point?

And those last three aren't really nature. Unless you say we are animals and apart of nature.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Indeed, just because something is caused by nature is no reason not to help those who are suffering or in danger.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Post Reply