What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

The Next Generation
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Post by Deepcrush »

Dude, that's awsome!

The Excelsior is the Yoda of the ST ships. Old but experienced and still kickass!
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Post by Mark »

Crap. Did that joke just backfire on me? :bangwall: :lol:
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Post by Deepcrush »

Yes... yes it did. 8)

Don't Star Wars with the Jedi Master son.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Post by Mark »

:takecover: I brought that upon myself.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
Tyyr
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10654
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Post by Tyyr »

Prometheus - There is no ship in the Trek universe I loathe more. MVAM just seems like one of those things some fanboy on acid thought up. That is a fan wank.

Intrepid - The nacelles. They're just too small and the variable position thing just seems like an unnecessary complication.

I've never had a huge problem with the Defiant. Most Trek ships we've seen have the jack of all trades problem. They try to do an incredible amount in just one hull. Strip away all the other crap, the hotel, the research and science gear, all the extraneous stuff to get it down to guns, engines, and shields and I can buy that a much smaller ship can have all the firepower and protection of a much larger ship like the GC. Yeah its a touch on the small side, I might increase it's size by another 33% but its not that out there to me. I actually like that it's ugly as sin, most starfleet ships are good looking but from a combat standpoint very poorly designed.

I also like the Constellations. Ugly but can every ship be a Sovereign?
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Prometheus - There is no ship in the Trek universe I loathe more. MVAM just seems like one of those things some fanboy on acid thought up. That is a fan wank.
I....I think I'm in love.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Post by Mikey »

Tyyr wrote:Prometheus - There is no ship in the Trek universe I loathe more. MVAM just seems like one of those things some fanboy on acid thought up. That is a fan wank.
[nitpick]No, someone on acid would never come up with something so angular and unfriendly-looking. Trust me.[/nitpick]
Tyyr wrote:Intrepid - The nacelles. They're just too small and the variable position thing just seems like an unnecessary complication.
Agreed by almost everyone I've heard from on the matter.
Tyyr wrote:I also like the Constellations. Ugly but can every ship be a Sovereign?
That little junction where all four pylons meet seems like a terrible liability.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Tyyr
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10654
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Post by Tyyr »

Mikey wrote:That little junction where all four pylons meet seems like a terrible liability.
Starfleet ships are mostly full of such liabilities. The nacelle pylons, the Constitution class' interconnection between the saucer and engineering section, etc. The Constellation's isn't great but it's not a stand out to me as horrible design.The Oberth's pylons that are too thin even for a turbolift would be my picks for something like that.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Post by Mikey »

Nacelle pylons have varied in design quality, but always seemed like a necessary evil (at least for Federation-specific warp tech.) The Connie's neck was always to long and exposed for my taste but at least seemed to be of pretty robust construction. The Oberth - it's just weird, but never intended to go into harm's way; the Constellation, AFAIK, was intended to be a warship/explorer.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Reliant121
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 12263
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Post by Reliant121 »

I thought the Constellation nacelle struts looked fairly bulky and robust,
Tyyr
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10654
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Post by Tyyr »

The location where they connect to the hull is, it's a blocky protrusion off the back of the saucer. The upper and lower nacelle pairs are each connected to a single pylon however.
User avatar
steamrunner
Lieutenant jg
Lieutenant jg
Posts: 273
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 5:58 am
Location: Sheridan, Wyoming
Contact:

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Post by steamrunner »

Can I bring up a TOS-era ship even though this is a TNG board? I never did like the Saladin... Can you imagine getting assigned to a Saladin and seeing it for the first time? "Uh...where's the rest of it?" :shock:

Wow...6 pages and not one mention of my beloved Steamrunner...(that'll jinx me for sure!)
"If? If my aunt had balls, she'd be my uncle..."
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Post by Mikey »

steamrunner wrote:Can I bring up a TOS-era ship even though this is a TNG board? I never did like the Saladin... Can you imagine getting assigned to a Saladin and seeing it for the first time? "Uh...where's the rest of it?" :shock:

Wow...6 pages and not one mention of my beloved Steamrunner...(that'll jinx me for sure!)
The Saladin isn't a canon 'Trek ship - it's a Franz Joseph ship.

(and I like the Steamrunner, too.)
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Post by Deepcrush »

steamrunner wrote:Can I bring up a TOS-era ship even though this is a TNG board? I never did like the Saladin... Can you imagine getting assigned to a Saladin and seeing it for the first time? "Uh...where's the rest of it?" :shock:
:laughroll:
Wow...6 pages and not one mention of my beloved Steamrunner...(that'll jinx me for sure!)
I think that's because no one here really dislikes the Steamrunner. My personal opinion is that it really serves no use in the modern fleet that can't be better filled by other ships but... again I've got nothing against the class as its own.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?

Post by Mark »

Didn't the Saldin become cannon when it appeared on that panel shot in the movie?
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
Post Reply