Was Shinzon a Pawn?

The Next Generation
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Was Shinzon a Pawn?

Post by Deepcrush »

Sorry, I couldn't even pretend that TWoK sucks.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Lt. Staplic
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 8094
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:25 am
Commendations: Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: Somewhere Among the Stars
Contact:

Re: Was Shinzon a Pawn?

Post by Lt. Staplic »

which is harder, pretending TwoK was bad or NEM was unbelievably amazing?
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Was Shinzon a Pawn?

Post by Deepcrush »

I don't see either as possible. First I would have to pretend that GWBush was a good leader, Enron was a friend of the people and I'd have to like the french.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Lt. Staplic
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 8094
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:25 am
Commendations: Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: Somewhere Among the Stars
Contact:

Re: Was Shinzon a Pawn?

Post by Lt. Staplic »

ouch, that is hard.
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Was Shinzon a Pawn?

Post by Deepcrush »

Good that we understand each other isn't it. :)
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Lt. Staplic
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 8094
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:25 am
Commendations: Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: Somewhere Among the Stars
Contact:

Re: Was Shinzon a Pawn?

Post by Lt. Staplic »

yes it is :)
I was just joking incase that was lost in digitation :poke:
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: Was Shinzon a Pawn?

Post by Sionnach Glic »

It certainly would explain why Romulus sent such a half-assed attempt to aid the E-E in stopping him.
Aye. If they knew the Scimitar was unable to endure any serious prolonged action, sending just a couple of warbirds makes senes. It doesn't really matter to the Romulans whether or not Earth gets busted by the Scimitar, but by sending a token force to assist the UFP they can claim that Shinzon's actions were not on behalf of the RSE, and avoid a war with the UFP.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Was Shinzon a Pawn?

Post by Graham Kennedy »

I doubt there was a specific plot to allow Shinzon to take power as a puppet, exactly. I think it's more likely a Hitler-style deal. There wasn't some grand conspiracy to get Hitler into power, but a lot of people did take the attitude "we will let the Nazis get rid of the Communists, then we'll step in and get rid of the Nazis". I'd be willing to bet that a lot of government types sat back and thought "well we can let Shinzon wipe out all the moderates, and then we can step in and get rid of him."
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Nickswitz
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 5:34 pm
Location: Home
Contact:

Re: Was Shinzon a Pawn?

Post by Nickswitz »

But they didn't realize that he was building a kick-butt ubership in their backyard, that he could completely annihilate the whole entire Romulan fleet with?
Just saying
The world ended

"Insanity -- a perfectly rational adjustment to an insane world" - R.D.Lang
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Was Shinzon a Pawn?

Post by Graham Kennedy »

Well Remans are shock troops of the Empire and all that. And with mines on Remus, I don't find it hard to believe they have a lot of shipyards there too. Not impossible to get your own ship built under those circumstances.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Nickswitz
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 5:34 pm
Location: Home
Contact:

Re: Was Shinzon a Pawn?

Post by Nickswitz »

True, I'm just saying, shouldn't a Romulan noticed a gigantic ship frame in the shipyards one day, that didn't look Romulan?
Unless the Romulans aren't actually watching the Remans , in which case it serves them right.
The world ended

"Insanity -- a perfectly rational adjustment to an insane world" - R.D.Lang
katefan
Lieutenant jg
Lieutenant jg
Posts: 358
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 7:15 am

Re: Was Shinzon a Pawn?

Post by katefan »

I just found too many holes in the movie to possibly enjoy it, from the Reman super ship to the idea that any Romulan is going to trust the human clone who has no reason whatsoever to do anything good for the people who shunted his ass off to the mines to die.

Sure, Star Trek IV used the probe plot from ST I, but at least the solution to the problem was considerably different. The tone of the two films are very different as well. In Nemesis it pretty much came down to a doomsday countdown and the science guy sacrificing his life after downloading his "soul" into someone else.

The jokes fell flat, Worf's appearance made about as much sense here as it did in Insurrection, B4's presence was useless, etc. etc. etc. Just a crap movie from opening credits to end.
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Was Shinzon a Pawn?

Post by Graham Kennedy »

Is there any reason to think the Romulans in the shipyards didn't know about the Scimitar? I see no reason why is couldn't have been a new design that the Romulans were developing in secret, and which Shinzon and his supporters fitted with the Thalaron thing themselves and took it over as part of the coup.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Was Shinzon a Pawn?

Post by Captain Seafort »

GrahamKennedy wrote:Is there any reason to think the Romulans in the shipyards didn't know about the Scimitar? I see no reason why is couldn't have been a new design that the Romulans were developing in secret, and which Shinzon and his supporters fitted with the Thalaron thing themselves and took it over as part of the coup.
I see no problem with the concept of the entire thing being a new Romulan design, including the Thaleron device. I do see a problem with the idea of of the Remans designing and building the thing on their own at all, let alone without the Romulans' knowledge.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
katefan
Lieutenant jg
Lieutenant jg
Posts: 358
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 7:15 am

Re: Was Shinzon a Pawn?

Post by katefan »

From the way the Scimitar (and what a very Romulan name it is. Almost as Romulan as Scorpion class shuttles) was built with it's unfolding wings it seemed that the Thalaron device was an inherent part of the ship, so it could not have been added on later.

That suggests to me that it could have been a doomsday weapon designed by the Romulans to be used against the Dominion, to target the Founder homeworld. Perhaps after the war was over the ship sat in mothballs since there was no immediate use for it. Section 31 had their own doomsday weapon after all so I could see the Tal Shiar doing much the same.
Post Reply