Weekly Warinificationness

[Sionnach Glic]

But they would have been mad at being called a "person," right?

Pretty much, yeah.

If he is talking about the person I think he is talking about, it isnt the person who shall not be named

Uh...huh?

[Mark]

[Tsukiyumi]

Can someone make a smiley holding a sign that says "DITL"?

[Deepcrush]

Its nice to see this war got so much talk...

[Teaos]

Because it was so one sided, you want a debate give us something that we can debate on. When I started the WotW's I gave wars that could go either way, this one was a curb stomp.

Romulans would win, Cardassians would lose.

[Granitehewer]

no,teaos, conflicts are not as clear cut as that at all, technical supremacy, convergence/divergence of political and public will and sustainability and adaptivity/maladaptiveness of industrial bases are no guarantors of a victor in a conflict, from the Halfaweyen, Sikut, Mahas ,Danagla , midianites, sakae, parthians, kshatriya, to the twentieth century struggles and successes of the mgbo, ogba, ukwuani to the north vietnamese or the Hmong, Yao, Tai dumm, and Shan or armenians and dagestanis.
From the egyptian middle kingdom until now even in Caucas conflicts or turko-sinic central asia , there are far more variables and it is naive to suggest otherwise or to base the assumption of a military outcome of half a dozen variables.
You may have a hard time believing my statement about the vote change, but its true, i'm not in the habit of lying and am buoyed by your optimism of the integrity of forums' population, and for 99% its true but the incident of which i spoke is true.

[Teaos]

True that their can be cases where sides that seem to be at a disadvantage can win but in this case most people didnt seem to think so.

It seems the vast majority think the RSE is superior or a match in every way thus the war isnt much of a war.

The reason a Federation Vs RSE war gets more debate is because it has more options.

[Granitehewer]

true,am just glad you,rochey,mikey, deepcrush, tsu, reliant,gk,seafort and all the others are such good debaters, i used to be on other forums and here at least there's real mental nourishment, even if i often lose or am in the minority lol.

[Teaos]

You usually can't be "wrong" around here, unless your debating a point that has an obviously right and wrong answer. A lot of the debates are just opinions or moral debates.

My personal favorite debate that I've been in here was with Seafort, we were debating whether the Transporter kills you or not. No right or wrong answer, just opinions, but I was right

[Granitehewer]

lol, the main thing is you and others dont sling s**t at each other, thus keeps the conversations here above a morass of insults or petty retaliation.
i didnt realise until yeaterday that someone had been banned from here, must be a ditl first

[Teaos]

We've banned bots and stuff before but that was the first full member ban.

[Granitehewer]

lol i'll not humiliate my weak understaning of technology and openly ask what a bot is......sheesh sounds like i missed a bit of a war

[Teaos]

Its when people make bots that will automatically join forums and make threads trying to sell products ect. Pretty much spamming the board.

[Captain Seafort]

My personal favorite debate that I've been in here was with Seafort, we were debating whether the Transporter kills you or not. No right or wrong answer, just opinions, but I was right

You go on believing that of you want to.

That one was indeed a good'un. One where there was evidence to support either side, and on where people could genuinely agree to disagree.

[Mark]

Just out of curiousity, DOES the transporter kill you???

:::ducking and taking cover:::