Saucer Seperation

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Fri Jul 25, 2008 10:10 pm

How embarassing would that have been for our starwart heroes

Post by **Graham Kennedy** » Fri Jul 25, 2008 11:34 pm

With things antimatter, the effect depends on the amount used. For all we know each of those little balls of light had like a microgram of antimatter in it.

I tend to think it's the 24th century equivalent of doing this :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAFCudNNG30

Bryan Moore · Post by **Bryan Moore** » Sat Jul 26, 2008 1:59 am

Do we know if the Nebula is capable of saucer separation?

Post by **Mikey** » Sat Jul 26, 2008 2:47 am

Bryan Moore wrote:Do we know if the Nebula is capable of saucer separation?

We just went through this somewhere around here. Even if it wer capable, why would a Nebula separate? The GCS has a lot of extra structure to make a functional ship even without the saucer. The Nevula doesn't - you'd end up with engines and two people.

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Sat Jul 26, 2008 4:03 am

And a deflector dish

Deepcrush · Post by **Deepcrush** » Sat Jul 26, 2008 4:30 am

And the big toaster from the mess hall. That damn thing's been missing for months.

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Sat Jul 26, 2008 4:46 am

Deepcrush wrote:And the big toaster from the mess hall. That damn thing's been missing for months.

Ack :::slapping forehead::: we got the big toaster, but left the bread in the galley, on the other half

Deepcrush · Post by **Deepcrush** » Sat Jul 26, 2008 5:26 am

So you brought the toaster but not the bread that was next to the toaster? Are you a trek writer or something?

Post by **Tsukiyumi** » Sat Jul 26, 2008 5:46 am

I think we're all forgetting that the ship's only bathroom is now floating away with the saucer section...

Deepcrush · Post by **Deepcrush** » Sat Jul 26, 2008 5:49 am

We'll build a new one, with a hottub!

kostmayer · Post by **kostmayer** » Sat Jul 26, 2008 8:56 am

Would be rather embarassing if the wall to the bathroom was along the split between the two hulls.

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Sat Jul 26, 2008 2:27 pm

I'd imagine that that'd be the least of your worries at that point.

Bryan Moore · Post by **Bryan Moore** » Sat Jul 26, 2008 4:48 pm

Mikey wrote:
Bryan Moore wrote:Do we know if the Nebula is capable of saucer separation?
We just went through this somewhere around here. Even if it wer capable, why would a Nebula separate? The GCS has a lot of extra structure to make a functional ship even without the saucer. The Nebula doesn't - you'd end up with engines and two people.

Right but in case of a warp core breach?

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Sat Jul 26, 2008 5:11 pm

Eject the core.

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Mon Jul 28, 2008 11:45 pm

Deepcrush wrote:So you brought the toaster but not the bread that was next to the toaster? Are you a trek writer or something?

Naa, if I was a Trek writer, I would have introduced to the weapons system, a "Deep Space Flame Thrower" and just ignore the lack of oxygen. Or our new sonic dampening device to protect our ship from them pesky deep space sound waves.

Forgetting the bread is a little more beliveable

Saucer Seperation

Re: Saucer Seperation

Re: Saucer Seperation

Re: Saucer Seperation

Re: Saucer Seperation

Re: Saucer Seperation

Re: Saucer Seperation

Re: Saucer Seperation

Re: Saucer Seperation

Re: Saucer Seperation

Re: Saucer Seperation

Re: Saucer Seperation

Re: Saucer Seperation

Re: Saucer Seperation

Re: Saucer Seperation

Re: Saucer Seperation