Cochrane's "Star Trek" line?

Aaron · Post by **Aaron** » Sun Feb 15, 2009 3:34 pm

Mikey wrote:
Agreed. And ENT would have improved if it included more Steppenwolf and/or Roy Orbison.

And more drunken scientists.

Sonic Glitch · Post by **Sonic Glitch** » Sun Feb 15, 2009 5:48 pm

Cpl Kendall wrote:
Mikey wrote:
Agreed. And ENT would have improved if it included more Steppenwolf and/or Roy Orbison.
And more drunken scientists.

As opposed to drunken writers?

Post by **Captain Seafort** » Sun Feb 15, 2009 5:55 pm

me,myself and I wrote:As opposed to lobotomised writers?

Fixed. I don't think you can attribute something as bad as Enterprise to mere intoxication.

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Mon Feb 16, 2009 12:35 pm

Damn right. I know people who could go out, have a dozen pints, and still be able to write better crap than what we got.

Post by **Mikey** » Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:14 pm

Excellent idea. I'll let you know how I make out.

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Tue Feb 17, 2009 10:36 pm

Hey, can't be worse than waht we got.

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:00 am

Oh, I REALLY think it could have

Post by **Tsukiyumi** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:40 am

"Worst possible Star Trek plot" split.

How'd you react when Cochrane said, "You're all astronauts, on some kind of star trek!"?