Abramsprise revised
Abramsprise revised
One thing I hated was how large the nacelles were and how 'skinny' the engineering hull was in the new Enterprise. I have no clue who made the original since I got it off of the internet almost two years ago.
I changed the markings to TOS, altered the nacelles and changed the bussard collectors to red. I fatten up the engineering hull as much I can and altered the front part of it and then changed the deflector dish to a goldish color. I am not completely happy with the bottom part of the engineering hull though.
What do you think?
I changed the markings to TOS, altered the nacelles and changed the bussard collectors to red. I fatten up the engineering hull as much I can and altered the front part of it and then changed the deflector dish to a goldish color. I am not completely happy with the bottom part of the engineering hull though.
What do you think?
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
Re: Abramsprise revised
It's like the Ford and Mercury versions... or Toyota and Lexus... etc...
I didnt care for the organic curves of the nacelles compared to the saucer. Your version straightens it a bit.
I didnt care for the organic curves of the nacelles compared to the saucer. Your version straightens it a bit.
Ugh... do not thump the Book of G'Quan...
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: Abramsprise revised
But the important question is, how long is it?!
I rather like your revisions, actually.
I rather like your revisions, actually.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Re: Abramsprise revised
1,746 meters. They scaled it twice as big as it should be, so why not scale it twice as big as the Abramsprise?GrahamKennedy wrote:But the important question is, how long is it?!
I rather like your revisions, actually.
Seriosuly, my version is about the same size as refit E-nil.
Currently I am working on a new project. Basically the refit Enterprise is a new ship because hardly anything would have survived intact during the refit. So I am working my way back from TMP Enterprise and giving it a TOS look. I am using the Phase II Enterprise as a starting point.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Abramsprise revised
Wasn't Phase II the triangular-hulled one for the TV series that was never made?
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Re: Abramsprise revised
GrahamKennedy wrote:But the important question is, how long is it?!
That's what she said...
Ugh... do not thump the Book of G'Quan...
Re: Abramsprise revised
Mikey wrote:Wasn't Phase II the triangular-hulled one for the TV series that was never made?
Yes and no. The one I am using is what fans call the Constitution (II) class.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 6:52 pm
- Location: I'm in your mind!
Re: Abramsprise revised
I like the changes to the engineering hull but I kinda prefer the blue colouring.McAvoy wrote:One thing I hated was how large the nacelles were and how 'skinny' the engineering hull was in the new Enterprise. I have no clue who made the original since I got it off of the internet almost two years ago.
I changed the markings to TOS, altered the nacelles and changed the bussard collectors to red. I fatten up the engineering hull as much I can and altered the front part of it and then changed the deflector dish to a goldish color. I am not completely happy with the bottom part of the engineering hull though.
What do you think?
Re: Abramsprise revised
The whole purpose was to make it look TOS as possible while making it 'sexy, sleek'.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
Re: Abramsprise revised
I think yours looks sexier and sleeker than the Abrams verision.
Bite my shiny metal ass
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 6:52 pm
- Location: I'm in your mind!
Re: Abramsprise revised
What program are you doing this in?
Re: Abramsprise revised
Photoshop CS3. I got the original picture off of the internet. I don't remember who made it but it does resemble Irishman's work though.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 6:52 pm
- Location: I'm in your mind!
Re: Abramsprise revised
Sounds good. I like the actual modifications just not the colour.
- Tinadrin Chelnor
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 3:11 am
- Location: Pendroca IV
Re: Abramsprise revised
I prefer the new red, stands out more. Looks good though
"No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against that power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand."
Re: Abramsprise revised
Well I wanted it to look more TOS Enterprise as much as I could.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"