Ideas for new classes of starships
-
- 2 Star Admiral
- Posts: 8094
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:25 am
- Commendations: Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: Somewhere Among the Stars
- Contact:
Re: Ideas for new classes of starships
sounds like fun
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Ideas for new classes of starships
Yeah, and "How I killed a man with my ka-bar" is a great tale to hear from the father of the girl you've just started to date.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Re: Ideas for new classes of starships
Yeah.......that WOULD be a bit nerve racking I'd imagine.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
-
- 2 Star Admiral
- Posts: 8094
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:25 am
- Commendations: Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: Somewhere Among the Stars
- Contact:
Re: Ideas for new classes of starships
kind of like that joke of Bill Engvall's:
when that guy comes over to get her for prom, I'll just hold him by the soulder and pull him in reel close so only he and I can here the conversation.
"Listen to me bud. You see that little girl over there, that's my only little girl, so if you have any thoughts about doing anything with my little girl you better remember something first...I ain't got no problem going back to prison!
when that guy comes over to get her for prom, I'll just hold him by the soulder and pull him in reel close so only he and I can here the conversation.
"Listen to me bud. You see that little girl over there, that's my only little girl, so if you have any thoughts about doing anything with my little girl you better remember something first...I ain't got no problem going back to prison!
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Ideas for new classes of starships
Out of curiosity, why is this?Exactly. My friend in the Corps said himself: Marines are not for defense. They're for attacking enemy positions, and flattening anything that gets in their way. They make lousy garrisons, which is where the Army comes in.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: Ideas for new classes of starships
The US Marines are trained primarily as an assault force, sort of a first in, first out deal. They are generally higher quality soldiers than are in the Army and their limited numbers simply make their employment in anything but that role to be a bloody waste of time and money. Then there's simply just the fact that garrison duty sucks donkey balls and erodes your edge.Rochey wrote:
Out of curiosity, why is this?
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Ideas for new classes of starships
Okay, thanks. I wasn't aware the USMC have better gear than the army.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: Ideas for new classes of starships
Not exactly better, better training certainly. Their gear is naturally more orientated towards amphib assault but they are actually funded by the Navy so they have often lagged behind the Army in kit. They used the M-60 after it had been phased out in the Army and continued to use the M-60 tank for a good deal longer as well.Rochey wrote:Okay, thanks. I wasn't aware the USMC have better gear than the army.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Ideas for new classes of starships
Sorry, I somehow misread "The US Marines are trained primarily as an assault force, sort of a first in, first out deal. They are generally higher quality soldiers than are in the Army[...]" as "They have better equipment".
Just ignore me, it's one of those days.
Just ignore me, it's one of those days.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Ideas for new classes of starships
Nice to see that Rochey is still as quick as ever...
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Ideas for new classes of starships
Well, for specific things like amphibious assault, they do have better (situationally) gear. Marines in the South Pacific, for example, were the first to encounter Japanese pillboxes, and thus were the first to be equipped with the new man-portable flamethrowers that were being developed. However, USMC training tends to be more rigorous than Army basic, and is focussed on assault and advance. As Kendall said, the numbers don't support static or defensive strategies. In that aspect, it's not much different than if you had asked, "Why don't the Brits replace their entire army with RM's?"
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 6026
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
- Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot
Re: Ideas for new classes of starships
I thought the marines had more of a first in, last out mentality?Cpl Kendall wrote:The US Marines are trained primarily as an assault force, sort of a first in, first out deal. They are generally higher quality soldiers than are in the Army and their limited numbers simply make their employment in anything but that role to be a bloody waste of time and money. Then there's simply just the fact that garrison duty sucks donkey balls and erodes your edge.Rochey wrote:
Out of curiosity, why is this?
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Ideas for new classes of starships
Individually, yes. They're trained in an atmosphere of self-sacrifice. However, the USMC's mission goals do not generally include garrisoning or holding territory. The Army has the numbers for that.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 6026
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
- Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot
Re: Ideas for new classes of starships
Fair enough. So if they're put in the situation of a withdrawal, they will be the last out but they may not be the ones who are occupying the territory?Mikey wrote:Individually, yes. They're trained in an atmosphere of self-sacrifice. However, the USMC's mission goals do not generally include garrisoning or holding territory. The Army has the numbers for that.
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: Ideas for new classes of starships
Like Mikey said, that's more of an indivdual thing. The Marines are quite high on themselves but their numbers and role simply do not allow for that to take place in the real world, unless someone is screwing the pooch. One does not sacrifice a special ops capable unit to a rear guard.me,myself and I wrote: I thought the marines had more of a first in, last out mentality?