Page 2 of 13

Re: Ship nits on main site

Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 7:45 pm
by Tsukiyumi
Found a new hobby, Stitch? :lol:

Re: Ship nits on main site

Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 7:46 pm
by stitch626
Yep. I'm bored and am procrastinating on my homework.

Re: Ship nits on main site

Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 7:48 pm
by Tsukiyumi
Tsk, tsk. No need for that, unless it's absurdly boring to you, and/or something you don't need to know.

Re: Ship nits on main site

Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 7:57 pm
by stitch626
4 x 2nd class photon torpedo tube with 120 rounds
The 4 is yellow. This is for the E-A. From what I remember, the E-A had only two torpedo launchers. Feel free to correct me if I am wrong.

Re: Ship nits on main site

Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 8:25 pm
by stitch626
You have this in the specs for the type 7 shuttle:
Armament : , total output 200 TeraWatts
Don't know what is missing.

Re: Ship nits on main site

Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 8:34 pm
by stitch626
You give this as the armament of the type 10 shuttle:
2 x Type IV phaser bank
yet we can see two arrays on the nacelles.


BTW, I don't mean any disrespect by going on this mad nit finding binge, I just needed something to do, and the forum isn't active much this weekend.

Re: Ship nits on main site

Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 8:47 pm
by stitch626
You give the Travel pod this performance
Impulse only : Max Impulse Speed : 0.01 x c
Atmospheric Cruise (Mach) : 2
Atmospheric Max (Mach) : 4
I would think that the travel pod would be sub-impulse, since it only had thrusters, which you later state.

Re: Ship nits on main site

Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 8:48 pm
by IanKennedy
stitch626 wrote:In the Scimitar notes section, many paragraphs have this at the end
#2009}
I have no idea what it means. :?
Ah, that's a reference without correct formatting. References look like {this is the text you see.#number} where #number tells the system what reference to use. I've just fixed those issues, and as you can see the #2009} is gone and those paragraphs are yellow and referenced to Star Trek : Nemesis, which is reference #2009.

Please ignore the man behind the curtain :)

Re: Ship nits on main site

Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 9:02 pm
by stitch626
In the Galor pictures section, the picture with this text:
A Galor taking a beating from Klingon ships. The ship was destroyed moments later.
is a Keldon, not a Galor.

Re: Ship nits on main site

Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 9:04 pm
by Captain Seafort
It's also not being attacked by Klingons - it's being hit by the Defiant's pulse phasers.

Re: Ship nits on main site

Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 9:21 pm
by stitch626
On the Dominion Attack Ship pictures page, the picture with this text
Another dorsal view, highlighting the nacelles.
is actually of the ventral view.

And this one
A view of the rear ventral surface.
is of the dorsal surface.

Re: Ship nits on main site

Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 1:26 am
by Mark
I noticed that in the Constellation starship section, the USS Hathaway is listed as destroyed in Peak Performance. I don't remember the ship being destroyed. Are you sure about that one???

Re: Ship nits on main site

Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 2:17 am
by stitch626
I believe your right Mark. I can't believe I missed that.

Re: Ship nits on main site

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 6:41 pm
by KuvahMagh
Further with the Constellation page, you list the length as 231m and your Reference seems to be taken from the Encyclopedia which you scaled it from. You then say that non-Canon sources give a size of 315m. However we do have a Cannon reference to the size of the ship from "The Battle" when the E-D is towing Stargazer, in fact you have the pic in the Constellation pictures page. In the picture the Constellation appears much closer to the E-D in terms of size than the Information listed under size would suggest and when you look at the Size Comparison page between the Galaxy and Constellation it appears very different to what was seen on screen.

As to the Hathaway I think they destroyed it in the end to get rid of the Ferengi or some such.

Re: Ship nits on main site

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 6:47 pm
by Captain Seafort
KuvahMagh wrote:As to the Hathaway I think they destroyed it in the end to get rid of the Ferengi or some such.
No they didn't - they used a Picard Manoeuvre-esque trick to fool the Ferengi into thinking the Hathaway had been destroyed, by detonating a torpedo right in front of it while the ship made a short-range warp jump behind a nearby planet. From the Ferengi's persepective it appeared that that the ship had been destroyed.